Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,358 posts)
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:06 AM Sep 2017

Now Its Medicare Under the Knife

While Trump and the Senate whip the nation into another frenzy over another effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, high-flying Tom Price and his Health and Human Services Dept. (HHS) are quietly floating plans to significantly alter Medicare and Medicaid.

The new proposal? A move toward privatization, of course. Allow doctors to charge more money for their services and make the elderly and poor pay the price.

The agency’s policy center, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), put out a Request for Information last week as it prepares to “lead the Center in a new direction” and unveil potentially drastic changes to the federal programs that provide healthcare insurance for more than 130 million Americans, including children. CMMI, which has broad authority over some $1 billion annually, was created by Congress in 2010 to examine and test new models to pay for and deliver healthcare.

Medicare’s main trust fund is projected to run out of money in a decade and Medicaid is the second-largest line item in most state budgets, according to Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), who wrote an op-ed piece for The Wall Street Journal selling the new ploy to overhaul the federal insurance plans a day before the agency filed the document.

“Strengthening Medicare and Medicaid will require healthcare providers to compete for patients in a free and dynamic market, creating incentives to increase quality and reduce costs,” Verma wrote. “We must shift away from a fee-for-service system that reimburses only on volume and move toward a system that holds providers accountable for outcomes that allows them to innovate.”

That sounds great, until you look at the concepts in the document and realize without the current regulations in place, physicians won’t be held accountable and patients could get fleeced.


https://www.dcreport.org/2017/09/25/now-its-medicare-under-the-knife/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
2. All this crap was foreseeable last year. Clear as day. Many gambled w people's well being
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:09 AM
Sep 2017

NEVER GONNA FORGET IT!

In the meantime, we fight. We fight all this crap.

Instead of making progress. We fight regress.




douglas9
0. Now Its Medicare Under the Knife

While Trump and the Senate whip the nation into another frenzy over another effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, high-flying Tom Price and his Health and Human Services Dept. (HHS) are quietly floating plans to significantly alter Medicare and Medicaid.

The new proposal? A move toward privatization, of course. Allow doctors to charge more money for their services and make the elderly and poor pay the price.

The agency’s policy center, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), put out a Request for Information last week as it prepares to “lead the Center in a new direction” and unveil potentially drastic changes to the federal programs that provide healthcare insurance for more than 130 million Americans, including children. CMMI, which has broad authority over some $1 billion annually, was created by Congress in 2010 to examine and test new models to pay for and deliver healthcare.

Medicare’s main trust fund is projected to run out of money in a decade and Medicaid is the second-largest line item in most state budgets, according to Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), who wrote an op-ed piece for The Wall Street Journal selling the new ploy to overhaul the federal insurance plans a day before the agency filed the document.

“Strengthening Medicare and Medicaid will require healthcare providers to compete for patients in a free and dynamic market, creating incentives to increase quality and reduce costs,” Verma wrote. “We must shift away from a fee-for-service system that reimburses only on volume and move toward a system that holds providers accountable for outcomes that allows them to innovate.”

That sounds great, until you look at the concepts in the document and realize without the current regulations in place, physicians won’t be held accountable and patients could get fleeced.


https://www.dcreport.org/2017/09/25/now-its-medicare-under-the-knife/
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. As much as I despise Tom Price, this is not new. In fact, much of it came out of Obama's ACA and
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:52 AM
Sep 2017

Clinton's Administration (1997).

Much of that article and Request for Information is about alternatives to the fee-for-service system that most people blame for much of the uncontrolled Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance expenditures. Obama was a big proponent to alternative payment mechanism that promote quality, not more services that physicians and hospitals profit from.

Physicians have been able to opt-out of Medicare for years through so-called "private contracts." Very few do. Most that do are Ron/Rand Paul types who are philosophically opposed to government programs -- in other words they are so stupid you wonder how they became physicians. Some cater to the wealthy. But it's less than 10,000, and personally, even if I could afford it, I would not want to see them. Physicians who have opted out have to clearly notify patients -- through very specific, written contracts -- that they are opted out and Medicare will not pay anything toward their care with that physician.

We've talked about getting the profit out of health care. This is one way to do it, by designing reimbursement systems that incentivize cost efficient, high quality care.

To even think about as sustainable Medicare-for-All, with no copays or deductibles, free choice of any provider, picking up millions of uninsured, etc., we are going to have to change the payment mechanism that allow doctors to order tests they profit from that are questionable.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
5. Last year Medicare introduced a new program targeted for cancer treatment for rural seniors.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:35 AM
Sep 2017

The 5 year program was started July 2016, and our local hospital was one of maybe 30 across the country to test teh new program, which is geared to a slightly different payment system based on outcomes.
A large for profit cancer institute in Mobile sends a dr. up here every Tuesday ( doctors rotate the job, so you seldom see the same one more than a couple of times).
The institute bills for the actual chemo drugs, but ancillary drugs you can buy with prescription locally.
The idea is to see if private/Gov. can lower costs,and the Medicare program pays a small incentive fee.

I know all this because I was diagnosed with breast cancer 2 weeks after the program started, and if it were not here, I would have had to drive 180 miles round trip to Mobile, in the summer heat, for 3x week chemo for 6 months. ( the surgery is available at the hospital here, thank god.)

My cost was the annual deductible, plus the 20% co-pay for surgery ( billed as outpatient, thank god, hospitalization is a lot more out of pocket)
and for follow up visits, blood tests, various physical exams ( pap test, mammogram, etc). and teh hospital allows no interest, low monthly payments,
The hospital has built an almost completed new ward for oncology dept. so I think they plan on sticking around for a few years, hopefully until I hit 5 year remission cycle.

I do not think that Medicare for all will be free of deductibles and co-pays. Private insurance charges for that, so does ACHA,
only Medicaid is "free" to the patients but they still have out of pocket prescription costs.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Glad you are getting this treatment. I really think that a partnership between government and
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:46 AM
Sep 2017

groups like this are an important part of getting care to people, nowadays. Part of that is because government alone often moves too slowly if they have to set up the funding and infrastructure, etc., needed to move these projects along.

The reason I mentioned no copays/deductibles is because that is in Sanders' Medicare-for-All Bill.

Take care.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Now Its Medicare Under th...