Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:41 AM Sep 2017

Edible art: Bakers want Supreme Court to acknowledge there's more to a cake than baking.

By Robert Barnes September 24 at 5:33 PM

There are dozens, perhaps hundreds, of people who will file friends-of-the-court briefs to advise the Supreme Court on how to settle the dispute between the gay Colorado couple seeking a wedding cake to celebrate their marriage and the baker who refused them, citing his religious beliefs. But only one amicus brief longs for technology that would enable “touch, smell and taste.”

It settles for photographs.

The Brief for Cake Artists as Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party is drawing outsize attention for its unique approach. It contains the usual legal arguments, of course, and references to Supreme Court precedents. But more noticeably it relies on 38 pictures of cakes in various states of construction and completion. Among them: an elaborate, towering concoction that had to be assembled on site (with frosting to match the bride’s lace) and a red-velvet confection disguised as a medium-rare T-bone steak.



The point is to convince the justices that, whatever else they decide, they should acknowledge that cakemaking is not “just baking,” but also an art.

“If this brief did nothing beyond showcasing this small sample of creative work, it would surely convey that these unique projects involve artistic talent and communicate emotions and messages at least as clearly as other forms of art,” says the file from 11 bakers from around the country.

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/edible-art-bakers-want-supreme-court-to-acknowledge-theres-more-to-a-cake-than-baking/2017/09/24/8af2da34-9e32-11e7-9c8d-cf053ff30921_story.html

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Edible art: Bakers want Supreme Court to acknowledge there's more to a cake than baking. (Original Post) DonViejo Sep 2017 OP
A tiered cake requires serious engineering. JNelson6563 Sep 2017 #1
Maybe tiki-torches are also a form of art? DetlefK Sep 2017 #2
Tend to agree. n/t MosheFeingold Sep 2017 #4
There's not the same kind of artistic integrity argument Ms. Toad Sep 2017 #5
Marcel Duchamp disagrees! FSogol Sep 2017 #13
If you can find me the artist who designed the mass-marketed tiki torches Ms. Toad Sep 2017 #15
Thorny issue, no matter how one slices it. MosheFeingold Sep 2017 #3
I'm surprised that there aren't businesses out there that exclusively cater to gay weddings. Initech Sep 2017 #7
So do I MosheFeingold Sep 2017 #9
I'm not a business major. Initech Sep 2017 #11
You'd think in this economy these morons would want the extra business. Initech Sep 2017 #6
Like when Trump copied Obama's cake? Orrex Sep 2017 #8
Looks like a patriotic Dalek n/t MosheFeingold Sep 2017 #10
Penceterminate! FSogol Sep 2017 #14
Bigots can't argue this rationale. procon Sep 2017 #12

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
1. A tiered cake requires serious engineering.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:52 AM
Sep 2017

Seriously. the anti-bakers should fuck off but I like this recognition for bakers part. It can be epic stuff. Ask me how I know.

Julie~~the baker

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
2. Maybe tiki-torches are also a form of art?
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:54 AM
Sep 2017

"Nope, I refuse to sell tiki-torches to Neo-Nazis. They are my kind of free speech."

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
5. There's not the same kind of artistic integrity argument
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:14 AM
Sep 2017

available fo rmass-produced/marketed products as there is for individual artwork.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
15. If you can find me the artist who designed the mass-marketed tiki torches
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 12:17 PM
Sep 2017

you might have a point.

But the scenario suggested was a merely a store owner refusing to sell the tiki torches, not the artist who made them (or designed the mold for a mass-produced ceramic item).

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
3. Thorny issue, no matter how one slices it.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 09:59 AM
Sep 2017

The First Amendment permits not only speech but permits one to refrain from "speech" (i.e., refusing to say the Declaration of Independence).

A State Actor in the USA cannot make someone say something with which they disagree.

I could even see that simple white cakes, sent to Nazis would be speech in the form of symbols -- white purity, for example. I'd no more bake that than I'd jump off a bridge.

Long way of saying, the First Amendment permits idiots to say stupid things or refuse to say normal things. Hence, I'm in favor of taking my business to a different baker and to leave these idiots alone.

Initech

(100,079 posts)
7. I'm surprised that there aren't businesses out there that exclusively cater to gay weddings.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:41 AM
Sep 2017

If these Christian dipshits are so protective of their beliefs over petty bullshit, fuck 'em. Why not have dress designers, banquet halls, catering companies, photographers, etc that only cater to gay weddings? I see a missed monetary opportunity here!

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
9. So do I
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:49 AM
Sep 2017

When I was a teenager (mind you this was prior to WWII), there were lots of establishments that were crappy to Jews. So we built our own. (I'm thinking, in particular, about the YMCA, whose policies forced us to create the JCC.)

Normal consumers will destroy these guys. No one supports them and everyone will shun them.

Initech

(100,079 posts)
11. I'm not a business major.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:56 AM
Sep 2017

But anyone can see that turning away customers is dangerous and detrimental to your business. Not only does it hurt the reputation of your business, it will cost you customers in the long run when they learn that anyone can be turned away.

Initech

(100,079 posts)
6. You'd think in this economy these morons would want the extra business.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 10:37 AM
Sep 2017

Turning away customers hurts regardless of your beliefs will ultimately hurt your business in the long run.

procon

(15,805 posts)
12. Bigots can't argue this rationale.
Mon Sep 25, 2017, 11:21 AM
Sep 2017

Any artistic creator for hire has a certain style that appeals to their clientele. Even if they might prefer to specialize in cakes featuring artistic cats and unicorns, business demands that they deliver whatever subjects their customers demand. No matter what the customer orders, as a good business owner, any creative artist, even a cakemaker, tries their best for every client.

The cake decorator doesn't have to approve of a client's wishes any more than a hairdresser has to like her customer's choice in hairstyles, or a graphic artist has to accept the political POV of her customer. They do the best work they can because their clients want their artistic style, not their personal opinions. It doesn't take a genius to see that is how business works.

If a cake decorator can be artistically creative for a straight couple, or two guys hunting, a two girls at the beach, then they can be just as decorative with a gay couple, unless their objection is really more about bigotry and hate, which are, no doubt, hard to depict artistically.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Edible art: Bakers want S...