General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders Health Care Debate Was a Good Idea for a Very Simple Reason
it's a good thing we are not paying by the flag smilie becauseBernie Sanders Health Care Debate Was a Good Idea for a Very Simple Reason
Hes not who Republicans think he is.
When CNN announced last week that it would hold a debate on health care between Republican Sens. Bill Cassidy and Lindsey Graham and progressive Sens. Bernie Sanders and Amy Klobuchar, the reaction in some Democratic circles was anxiety. Im not sure single payer vs Graham-Cassidy is the debate we want right now, mused former Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor. With the Affordable Care Act once more on the ropes, the argument seemed to go, Sanders was choosing to advance his personal politics ahead of the priorities of the moment.
Those fears were unfounded. A Monday night cable news special was never going to be the make-or-break moment for health care reform, but more importantly, Sanders skeptics, and his Republican debating opponents, misunderstood his entire approach to health care reformno one in the Senate has as much riding on Obamacares survival as he does.
Both Cassidy and Graham, who learned shortly before the broadcast that they were at least one vote shy of passage, hoped to frame the conversation as a choice between their bill and the Medicare-for-all proposal Sanders unveiled last week. For the Republicans, it was a contrast of the free-market vs. crippling Canadian bureaucracy. If America only knew Bernie Sanders is a socialist.
But Sanders needed all of 10 seconds to make clear that his purpose at the debate was different. These gentlemen have on five occasions tried to repeal the Affordable Care Act, throw tens and tens of millions of Americans off of the health insurance they currently have, and make it impossible or very difficult for people with pre-existing conditions to get the health care that they can afford, he said.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)leftstreet
(36,109 posts)Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)and apologize. They should also reflect on why they are obsessed with bashing him.
Raster
(20,998 posts)The bashers have way too much "invested."
Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)Outside of your insinuation, I haven't seen any such thing around here.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)I don't know what I would do without your posts!
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)The poster made an assertion. One I believe to be inaccurate. I stated that clearly. It was directly on point to a part of their discussion.
How do your comments flow from what they or I stated? I don't see the connection.
If you have seen something to back up their assertion, please provide it. That would be on topic.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)I'm not the only person to have commented on that angle.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)And you seem very charming but I don't have that kind of time.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)All tucked in and sleeping now. Beyond amazing. Enjoy it.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)would be disappointed that 23 million Americans still have their health insurance and the right to live? Or did I misread and you meant the GOP was disappointed. Please clarify your comment.
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)You do realize this failed due to CBO scores and the very hard work Democrats were doing with the phone calls and protests?
Who would be disappointed that it failed? The people who were insisting that we needed to eradicate the ACA so they could get their miraculous Medicare for all bill, which they mistake for Single Payer?
Yes, I'm sure those people are severely disappointed.
They were also probably bitterly disappointed that if it had to fail, it did so BEFORE the debate, when they could have given thanks to Bernie, in their usual worshipful manner.
Democrats, liberals, progressives and pretty much all of those of us who have been screaming for the past few years to protect the ACA and improve it, we weren't disappointed at all. We know what this bill was, who it harmed and we weren't okay with hurting people because we were privileged enough to put our purity above real human beings.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)I was actually on ACA after I lost my job. Cobra...lol. 600 a month. I was getting unemployment insurance. It was all I was living on. A local hospital had an office. They ran my numbers and I was able to get on ACA. They saved my life. I am now on Medicare at triple the cost for less. I have never been in a more complicated system. They keep sending me all these huge books about what they cover and do not. The people helping *SHINE* are great, yet the info I have gotten is incorrect and I lost my doctor because of it. It is complicated and confusing and they need to fix this.
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)they actually don't know what medicare is. You'd think that the fact that people are paying monthly fees and need supplemental insurance would tell you it's not what's being touted as this miraculous Single Payer program.
Not everything is covered, there is a reason doctors don't love taking it, and require supplemental insurance, that's with a population that's not the entire US.
I realize it's just a catchy name, and Conyer's version isn't just Medicare for everyone, not sure what Sanders' is. But the profound ignorance and the aggressive hostility whenever anyone dare raise any questions is just insane.
You've got dudebros writing ridiculous opinion pieces about anyone daring to ask rational, simple questions and people spreading that trash to attack Democrats.
We need to address the problems in the system not just have rallies where people seek out camaraderie and wave their pom poms. Healthcare is not exciting, it requires a lot of hard boring work, just to understand what's going on, what's needed and how to achieve our goals.
Looking at Charles Gaba's site makes me a bit dizzy, there is sooooooooooooooooo much information there! And I'm interested in healthcare and public health! I guess ignorance is bliss and that's why they think it's so easy to just wave a magical wand.
I don't care HOW we get to universal healthcare, I just want us to get there, and these diehard "my way and no other" don't seem to understand the stakes for real people.
I'm glad you found people who are willing to help you navigate that maze.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)It is incredibly complicated and near impossible to navigate.
I want universal healthcare as well. Ha...will probably be dead and gone before that time. Well...perhaps not...my family is know for their longevity.
Thanks~
Ninsianna
(1,349 posts)these people spreading the propaganda that Dems are against this, are either lying, ignorant AF, or engaging in blatant divisiveness.
It's pure BS.
Have hope, SheShe! And take care of yourself, we need you around!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)They'll never admit that he has done anything right
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)But saying I was concerned was not bashing him. So I guess I can't help you.
greeny2323
(590 posts)Why is it called "Bernie Sanders Health Care Debate"? There was a Democrat there as well. And many in the Democratic party have been fighting for universal health care for decades.
Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)It's funny how Bernie was single-handedly killing the ACA but now that the Berniepocalypse didn't happen he is stealing the limelight.
melman
(7,681 posts)It was all 100% Bernie Bernie Bernie...but now? Not so much.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)StrictlyRockers
(3,855 posts)Infighting & circular firing squad BS serves the interests of the Republicans.
I'd never bash Hillary. I love her almost as much as I love Bernie. It's lame af to bash a hard working progressive like Bernie on this forum. Super not into it.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Unfortunately, every time I come here and start reading posts, I am frustrated by how divisive some people are here. It is as if anyone who does not have the exact same opinions and feelings as they have are not "true Democrats" or are being destructive to the party. So good luck with that unity thing until the ones who are undermining it figure out that they are undermining it.
ms liberty
(8,580 posts)I didn't get to see the debate myself, but there are several members who would be all over DU today stoking the Bernie hate if he had performed badly, as they'd hoped and expected. Their view of Bernie does not match the reality; I've been watching Bernie for about 20 years now, so I expected him to do well. From comments here I gather that Sen Klobuchar did a good job too, which is also as I expected. Our side seems to be getting good reviews from the limited reading I've been able to do so far.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)And as it is demonstrable that "no one watched" is false ....
lapucelle
(18,275 posts)in his debut in that time slot. Rachel finished second.
You are correct about it being "demonstrably false that no one watched the debate". In fact, the debate was the third most popular cable news broadcast on Monday in the 9:00 hour.
http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/scoreboard-monday-sept-25/342902
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/tv-news-fox-news-hannity-tops-maddow-9-oclock-debut-1043157
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Quixote1818
(28,946 posts)I said he would defend the ACA
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029623884
And I predicted he would prove the critics wrong
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017458472
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)samnsara
(17,622 posts)PatrickforO
(14,577 posts)about Bernie.
But...................................it ISN'T about Bernie, or Clinton or Klobuchar.
It is about kitchen table issues, about articulating positions on these issues that appeal to the independent voters and then winning elections.
I'm so sick of hearing 'Bernie this,' and 'Bernie that,' that I want to puke. Leave the guy alone. He's towing the line and articulating kitchen table issues in a way that will get people to the polls to vote for Democratic candidates.
What is with all the divisiveness.
This happens on here every frickin day, and it has to stop. Who is our party's leader? Who is our bench? What are they saying? What are they doing? What is the plan for winning elections?
Honestly, I don't see much except a bunch of emails that want me to give money. Where are the firebrand populists? Jack and Bobby were like that. Where are the Democrats who can make people feel like they are right in the living room with voters? FDR was like that. Where are the Democrats who can forge coalitions, keep them together and make things happen? Where are the Democrats who know policy through and through - Obama and Clinton are both like that. So is Bernie. And there are several others.
So why in the HELL are we fighting, sniping at each other, over and over and over and over and over.......................
Unless we can stop this shit, we can forget about being a viable party, because no matter how shitty the Republicans are, and they have truly outdone themselves, if we don't seize the day and get in step with one another WE WILL KEEP LOSING ELECTIONS.
And I don't want that because we are an inch away from allowing these nazis to start another Holocaust.
Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)Bernie is horrible because words.
-words don't pan out-
Look that didn't happen. Stop already.
Bernie is terrible because new-words.
-new-words don't pan out.
And then invariably somebody demands that "the back and forth" stop.
PatrickforO
(14,577 posts)But my point stands. We need to learn how to win elections because we're not doing so good right now. Got a few victories in off elections, but the GOP has a huge, and undeserved majority.
My point is we have to fix that and wasting time fighting about Bernie isn't going to help us resolve the voter suppression, the Russian hacking, the failure to reach the independent voters and so on.
Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)The left here on DU can either STFU or defend Sanders against the endless barrage of bullshit attacks. STFU seems to be the worse of those two options.
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #34)
Post removed
moriah
(8,311 posts)Re-read the post. He's saying Sanders supporters are in the position of either shutting up or defending him, and he thinks shutting up is the worse option.
I say bad faith alert.
betsuni
(25,538 posts)mountain grammy
(26,624 posts)Senators Klobuchar and Sanders did great.. both speak for me. This is a debate that really is "just that simple" and we can win it if we remain focused.