Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,659 posts)
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 06:37 PM Sep 2017

How past income tax rate cuts on the wealthy affected the economy

By TYLER FISHER at Politico

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/gop-tax-rate-cut-wealthy/

"SNIP...........


The Congressional Research Service published a paper in 2012 that found no correlation between top tax rates and economic growth. Congressional Republicans protested the findings, and the service briefly withdrew the paper.

Republicans argued that the CRS paper had methodological errors, namely that it didn't account for the long-term benefits of tax rate cuts. The paper looked only at effects on growth within the first year of the cuts.

POLITICO looked at each time the country changed the top income tax rate and the following five years of GDP per capita growth rate. The results are similar to the CRS findings: changing the top income tax rate does not have a predictable effect on economic growth.


............SNIP"

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How past income tax rate cuts on the wealthy affected the economy (Original Post) applegrove Sep 2017 OP
Tax cuts do not grown the economy or pay for themselves Gothmog Sep 2017 #1
Only increased income for middle, lower middle and poor boosts the economy! angstlessk Sep 2017 #2
The "Trickle Down Theory" is total right-wing bullshit! smirkymonkey Sep 2017 #3
They do wonders for the auction value of fine art, automobiles and wine. The_Casual_Observer Sep 2017 #4
Imported wine, art and cars. applegrove Sep 2017 #5
Auctions of "second hand" ultra luxury goods, an enormous market for the weatlhy that adds no The_Casual_Observer Sep 2017 #7
Don't piss on my back... cbreezen Sep 2017 #6
Growth after Reagan and JFK tax cuts -weird circumstances Cicada Sep 2017 #8
You Forgot An Important Factor Of The 80's ProfessorGAC Sep 2017 #10
Thanks for that excellent point Cicada Sep 2017 #11
Of course they dont world wide wally Sep 2017 #9
 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
4. They do wonders for the auction value of fine art, automobiles and wine.
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 07:09 PM
Sep 2017

The things that really supercharge the economy - like they said on NPR this am

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
7. Auctions of "second hand" ultra luxury goods, an enormous market for the weatlhy that adds no
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 07:21 PM
Sep 2017

value to the economy at all, but it's where they "shop" Sotheby's, Christies etc.

cbreezen

(694 posts)
6. Don't piss on my back...
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 07:20 PM
Sep 2017

and try to tell me it's raining...

They've tried this at least twice in my lifetime and they'll keep doing it as long as people keep voting for the flag, God and country.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
8. Growth after Reagan and JFK tax cuts -weird circumstances
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 07:22 PM
Sep 2017

The top federal marginal tax rate when JFK was elected was 91%. He passed a 10% tax credit on investment purchases. The money a rich person could keep went from 9% to 19%. That's a huge change so maybe it is not surprising that it stimulated growth. When Reagan was elected the top rate was 70% and it was lowered to 28%, so after tax income rose from 30% to 72%, again a huge incentive. But now tax cuts have far less impact because they start much lower. Bush Jr lowered the top rate from 39.6% to 35%. After tax income rose only 12%, not the more than 100% under JFK and Reagan, so maybe the failure of that cut to generate much economic growth makes sense. In our low tax rate world we probably shouldn't expect tax cuts to do much. In addition economic rationality, the super smart invisible hand of the market, can see that a tax cut now when we have a deficit will simply lead to higher rates tomorrow to pay back the larger national debt. So if the invisible hand of the market is as smart as conservatives say it is then it will see that current tax cuts are illusory, mere mirages. So the failure of lowering top tax rates to reliably increase economic growth should not surprise us. Odd that conservatives are too economically illiterate to understand those points.

ProfessorGAC

(65,042 posts)
10. You Forgot An Important Factor Of The 80's
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 07:31 PM
Sep 2017

The ridiculous military build up, using borrowed money, created return income as corporate taxes from the MIC firms.
If one adjusts for the 25% return on the borrowed money, the growth in revenue based on the tax cuts becomes illusory!

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
11. Thanks for that excellent point
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 08:02 PM
Sep 2017

I obsessively read yet you are the first person I have seen to make that excellent point. Post more articles please.

world wide wally

(21,743 posts)
9. Of course they dont
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 07:23 PM
Sep 2017

A capitalist economy is always based on demand for the product. It doesn't matter how much of a product is supplied if nobody wants it or can afford to buy it.
Pure bullshit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How past income tax rate ...