General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Trump administration wants being gay to be a fireable offense
https://news.vice.com/story/the-trump-administration-wants-being-gay-to-be-a-fireable-offenseAs if I could not despise this evil elf and Cheatolini any more...
dhol82
(9,353 posts)unblock
(52,319 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)Fireable offense:
1. being gay
2. being Mexican
3. being a Muslim
4. being black
5. being ill
6. being "uppety" (making too much money and not being "thankful"
7. being liberal
8. being a scientist
9. being a Jew
Does anybody else see a pattern here?
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Socialist.
"Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Trade Unionist.
"Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Jew.
"Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.
................Martin Niemoller
Ms. Toad
(34,087 posts)for same gender partners did so too soon.
Sexual orientation is not a protected class.
Getting married outs you (public records)
Partner A, employed in a place that offers domestic benefits, is obviously OK.
BUT Partner B may work in a place that is hostile to gays.
If the couple is forced to marry (and create a public record of sexual orientation) in order for Partner B to have access to decent and affordable health care, Partner B may lose his or her job because forcing gay couples to marry to get benefits when they are not yet otherwise protected from discrimination forces them (us) to choose between the relative safety of being closeted & access to healthcare through our spouses.