General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEver seen a first round knockout in presidential politics before? Well, you witnessed one last week
I have seen a lot of first round knockouts in a boxing ring but never before in presidential politics but still I recognized this one when it happened to Romney last week.
The moment Stephanie Cutter mentioned the possibility that Romney may be a felon it was all over. Ten seconds into this battle, Mighty Romney was on his back and sucking air. The referee was doing a ten count. And the President was standing in a neutral corner waving and throwing kisses to his adoring fans.
There is no way to recover from something like this in presidential politics. It can't be done. Period. End of story.
We will probably never see anything like this in presidential politics again in our lives. This is something you will be telling the little kids about when you get older.
Don
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Eagleton in 1972 was a 'knockout'.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Or do primaries not count?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Herman Cain this year for example.
And for those too young to remember, Muskie was the victim of Nixon campaign
dirty tricks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canuck_letter
TheCowsCameHome
(40,169 posts)He isn't taking anything very seriously, evidently.
edit: grammar.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)to weaken him for final knockout later this fall. Either way its a pleasure to watch!
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)and early from now on.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,245 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)stealing the election via the electronic voting machines to fall back on. I won't rest easy until the results come in and Obama wins.
unblock
(52,387 posts)i do think this line of attack may change the narrative and define rmoney (to our advantage).
this may lead to a series of rmoney "missteps" and "blunders" and "gaffes" that now fit into a storyline of someone who can't handle the (pretty basic) aspects of presidential politics.
eventually history will then view this as the turning point in the campaign.
not a knockout punch, but a major blow after which the fighter is just not the same.
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)Skittles
(153,226 posts)yes INDEED
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)The reason is because the National Review and other important GOP pols are asking Mitt to release. Why? Why not back him? It's becauise we are the cusp of event horizon--the next stage, a very scary pleace, where Mitt doubling down means the entire GOP brand is in jeopardy-- with their own folks. They cannot have a significant number of people staying home. There is probably a mad scramble behind the scenes to see who is next in line in case Mitt cannot be rehabilitated by the time of the convention.
This is why POTUS needs to swing hard, and relentless. It must be exhausting, but the payoff is huge downticket: taking back the House and keeping the Senate.......... With each upper cut, some unknown number of registered GOP voters already make the decision to stay home.
randome
(34,845 posts)I was wrong.
NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)So Palin was no surprise to me. Not in the least.
Don
quaker bill
(8,225 posts)A misquote about small businesses, and "he needs to learn how to be an American"...
In short, he has no counter punch.
The whole "unAmerican" bit was trotted out in 2008 and has never been out of play. Anyone who is going to believe it already does, so saying it again is pointless.
Obama has on the other has been trotting out the "business does not exist alone, it depends on public infrastructure" for at least a couple of years now. Anyone who is interested can understand it as simply true, there really is no debate. Businesses need sound infrastructure, an educated workforce, and basic social order (law and order) to survive. Look at any other country in the world where one of these bits is missing, and you will see little trade or foriegn investment, and a very impoverished population.