General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse GOP set to approve bill that could make mass shootings deadlier
House GOP set to approve bill that could make mass shootings deadlierAfter the hearing was delayed because of another shooting, the House will vote to deregulate gun silencers.
KIRA LERNER OCT 2, 2017, 10:08 AM
As details emerge about the carnage at a Las Vegas country music concert, the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, the House is set to move forward with a vote on a gun lobby-backed bill that would deregulate the sale of gun silencers, which make it harder to detect the origin of gunshots.
In the early chaos of these attacks, its often difficult for law enforcement and the general public to discern the original of gunshots and whether there could be more than one gunman. The use of silencers would make that even more difficult.
The GOP-sponsored bill, the Sportsmen Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act (SHARE Act), would remove gun silencers from the list of items regulated by the 1934 National Firearms Act. Under current law, silencers , which reduce the noise emitted from firearms, are regulated as strictly as machine guns and short-barreled rifles.
The National Rifle Associations top legislative priority this year has been to roll back the regulations on what they call noise suppressors. The gun lobby claims the restrictions are costly and unnecessary since silencers are rarely used to commit crimes.
https://thinkprogress.org/gun-silencer-vote-a6d777b63eb0/
kimbutgar
(21,195 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)and right wing?
I mean why do poor people vote for republicans when their express purpose is to strip them of every penny and enslave them to the 1%?
People are stupid and easily led to their own slaughter I guess?
madamesilverspurs
(15,809 posts)In one of their first acts back in February they voted to make it easier for the mentally ill to buy guns.
.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)Because the bullets are supersonic, you still get a massive noise.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)which can put you in the cold hard ground too.
And hey as a bonus the ammo is cheap!
Kaleva
(36,351 posts)If suppressors were a game changer, criminals would already be using them but they don't because in except for specific and uncommon situations, they are more of a hindrance then an asset.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)beings as quickly and efficiently as possible, why would a mass killer choose anything else?
I still see no good reason for a person to have a silenced weapon though.
It looks bad IMO.
Kaleva
(36,351 posts)I think detachable magazines capable of carrying more then 5 rounds ought to be banned and I wouldn't care if they banned semi-automatics all together. And I'm a gun owner.
Turbineguy
(37,368 posts)not being disturbed at dinner when your neighbor decides to shoot his wife and kids.