Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy gun violence research has been shut down for 20 years
In 1996, the Republican-majority Congress threatened to strip funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention unless it stopped funding research into firearm injuries and deaths. The National Rifle Association accused the CDC of promoting gun control. As a result, the CDC stopped funding gun-control research which had a chilling effect far beyond the agency, drying up money for almost all public health studies of the issue nationwide.
The National Institute of Justice, an arm of the U.S. Department of Justice, funded 32 gun-related studies from 1993 to 1999, but none from 2009 to 2012, according to Mayors Against Illegal Guns. The institute briefly resumed some funding in 2013 and 2014, in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in 2012, but has made no grants since then. Researchers in search of private funding say they know to avoid the word gun or firearm in the titles of violence-prevention studies to avoid blowback.
That hasn't stopped the rallying cry for common-sense gun control. But, as Rosenberg pointed out, we don't know what that looks like. Maybe background checks are not the answer. Maybe allowing guns on college campuses makes those places safer. Maybe there is a way to stop a single gunman from killing and wounding hundreds of people at a concert in Las Vegas.
But, many advocates say, it's impossible to have an honest debate about preventing gun violence when we can't study the issue.
The National Institute of Justice, an arm of the U.S. Department of Justice, funded 32 gun-related studies from 1993 to 1999, but none from 2009 to 2012, according to Mayors Against Illegal Guns. The institute briefly resumed some funding in 2013 and 2014, in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in 2012, but has made no grants since then. Researchers in search of private funding say they know to avoid the word gun or firearm in the titles of violence-prevention studies to avoid blowback.
That hasn't stopped the rallying cry for common-sense gun control. But, as Rosenberg pointed out, we don't know what that looks like. Maybe background checks are not the answer. Maybe allowing guns on college campuses makes those places safer. Maybe there is a way to stop a single gunman from killing and wounding hundreds of people at a concert in Las Vegas.
But, many advocates say, it's impossible to have an honest debate about preventing gun violence when we can't study the issue.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/10/04/gun-violence-research-has-been-shut-down-for-20-years/?utm_term=.4ff09e93c3c
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1519 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why gun violence research has been shut down for 20 years (Original Post)
PA Democrat
Oct 2017
OP
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)1. Folks can do the studies
this just needs private funding. I would contribute and I'm sure many others would also.
CincyDem
(6,385 posts)3. The issue is that few, if any, reputable researchers would take it on...
...they would likely be blackballed from any future federal money. It would have to be a big enough payout, to an old enough group of researchers, that they could retire...and then the payout would be used to discredit the findings of the work.
IMHO.
All that said, I agree with your point that somehow, this data is important to de-politiizing the solution. In the absence of data, decisions get made on opinions and that's worthless.
LeftInTX
(25,555 posts)2. I swear in the 1980s there were gun safety PSAs
I was a new mom and kept hearing that guns were most likely to be used on family members than criminals.
I think this info gave pause to some future gun owners.
riversedge
(70,299 posts)4. What is the rate of deaths due to injury by firearms in your state? See our state health facts tabl
Kaiser Family Found?Verified account @KaiserFamFound 4h4 hours ago
What is the rate of deaths due to injury by firearms in your state? See our state health facts table http://kaiserf.am/2fI6xxx
Link to tweet