Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 09:19 AM Oct 2017

Family Planning Practices (BC) Should Be Illegal By Federal Law Is A GOP Goal.

Because preventing pregnancy except for abstinence interferes with the nature of sex itself and prevents the creation of life and anything that interferes be it mechanical or chemical with that process is virtually murder. You are stopping the creation of a future person. A person is a person at conception is what the fundamentalist churches believe. Natural law on sex naturally means procreation. And natural law is "God's" law. So to repeat it you are not allowed to stop the natural process of sperm and egg. ALL means are forbidden.

This belief system is what is behind Trump's latest moves on contraception coverage. So a woman should not have access to such measures even if she pays for it herself. Remember the next step is to prevent insurance companies from offering any coverage at all and for doctors to be prevented from even mentioning contraception in any form.

Look at what we are doing internationally. No funding for ANY international organizations that even discusses abortion. And by their logic contraception IS abortion.

We are in a new world with Trump. The religious fanatics now control the White House. And we now see Trump appointing judges who believe what I just stated.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Family Planning Practices (BC) Should Be Illegal By Federal Law Is A GOP Goal. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Oct 2017 OP
I think companies would want to pay for it greymattermom Oct 2017 #1
I Believe That What You Are Saying Is Not Relevant To These People. TheMastersNemesis Oct 2017 #2
Not hiring women will soon fall under "religious liberty" AJT Oct 2017 #3
They want to go back to the husband works, wife stays home society. NutmegYankee Oct 2017 #4

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
1. I think companies would want to pay for it
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 09:21 AM
Oct 2017

because it has to be cheaper than prenatal care, labor and delivery, maternity leave, infant care, day care.....

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
2. I Believe That What You Are Saying Is Not Relevant To These People.
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 09:26 AM
Oct 2017

As a matter of fact they do not believe in any government help for any of those matters.

AJT

(5,240 posts)
3. Not hiring women will soon fall under "religious liberty"
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 09:34 AM
Oct 2017

which will trump(sorry)any discrimination protection.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
4. They want to go back to the husband works, wife stays home society.
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 09:56 AM
Oct 2017

It's their solution to unemployment. Most of us know that's not possible, but if you think sky daddy is all powerful, you'll believe it can revert back.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Family Planning Practices...