until the child is 18, who is also at risk. His father is a child molester.

A 12-year old cannot, by definition, give consent to sex. A 12-year old is a child. You cannot have sex with a 12-year old, because it will always be rape*, not sex. Doesn't matter if she shouted yes and took off her own clothes and laid down herself - it is rape. Talk about second-class citizens.


*Except in fucked up places like NZ and others where 12-year old boys "cannot" be raped by women (oh, yes they can, enter the 21st century for fuck's sake and change your laws, for god's sake) and other fucked up places where 12-year olds can be married if their parents consent (see above parenthesis, please.)

I a male dominated society, women are always subjected to sexual violence, with little consequence to males.
And in this case the male is rewarded. Given access to another child to assault and allowed to terrorize his victim again. Aided and abetted by the legal system.

under The Rape Survivor Child Custody Act. Such laws abolish the parental rights of the father where the child was conceived via rape, while leaving child support obligations in place. It gives an incentive to states if they pass the law using the “clear and convincing evidence standard,” without the necessity of a felony rape conviction.

They have a court hearing date in a few weeks. Since the girl was only 12 years old and the rapist was 19, it seems like the mother should prevail.

BTW, the mother/victim's court costs are being paid by Right to Life Michigan, which the article says were strong proponents of the bill.

http://www.sanilacbroadcasting.com/2017/10/07/court-case-in-sanilac-county-draws-ire-of-attorney/

This is just unbelievable to me.

I hope the Christian right sleeps easier at night knowing the horrors they have wrought on this country. Fuck these fucking assholes.

forged signatures? hearings without all parties present?