Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,677 posts)
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 09:06 PM Oct 2017

Make politics about government again

Josh Barro at Business Insider

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-politics-government-obamacare-policies-2017-10

"SNIP...........


In theory, we elect public officials to run the government.

The government does a lot of things, and public officials make a lot of choices about what it will do. Other choices they make affect how well the government does those things, and how much it costs. But these matters have become less and less central in American politics.

I see two diverging trends.

One is a fixation on small concerns that have little or nothing to do with official actions of governments, such as whose statues should be displayed in public and what NFL players do during the national anthem. The other is a fixation on concerns so large and amorphous they cannot obviously be addressed by public policy: for example, the more expansive versions of the ideas of white supremacy and structural oppression for the left; a sense of "losing our country" for the right.

Both trends have led to a politics that's not very much about government anymore — and a politics where politicians make promises about cultural matters outside their control, setting themselves up to disappoint the voters.

............SNIP"

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Make politics about government again (Original Post) applegrove Oct 2017 OP
When you have a narcissistic, sociopath/man-baby in charge BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #1
I have a beef with the media on this. LisaM Oct 2017 #2

BigmanPigman

(51,608 posts)
1. When you have a narcissistic, sociopath/man-baby in charge
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 09:12 PM
Oct 2017

that is what you get. It is pretty simple. Psych 101 covers it pretty much.

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
2. I have a beef with the media on this.
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 09:18 PM
Oct 2017

During the campaign, I don't think they ever examined what a presidency would be like under each of the candidates. They liked the circus, they liked the ratings they got, they seemed bent on normalizing Trump, and yet I don't think at any point was there a serious discussion of what would happen should he get elected.

Even if they didn't think Trump would win (despite the huge platform they gave him), I do think at some point sane minds should have realized that a Trump presidency would be utter chaos. It wouldn't have mattered to his base, but it might have mattered to people who stayed home or threw away their votes on a third party candidate. There should have been a lot more talk about this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Make politics about gover...