Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPRESIDENTIAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: THE CASE OF DONALD J . TRUMP
Link to the whole 108-page document from Brookings/CREW-
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/presidential-obstruction-of-justice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-final.pdf
iii
Executive Summary
There are significant questions as to whether President Trump obstructed justice. We do not yet know all the relevant facts, and any final determination must await further investigation, including by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But the public record contains substantial evidence that President Trump attempted to impede the investigations
of Michael Flynn and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, including by firing FBI Director James Comey. There is also a question as to whether President Trump conspired to obstruct justice with senior members of his administration although the public facts regarding conspiracy are less well developed.
Attempts to stop an investigation represent a common form of obstruction. Demanding the loyalty of an individual involved in an investigation, requesting that individuals help to end the investigation, and then ultimately firing that person to accomplish that goal are the type of acts that have frequently resulted in obstruction convictions, as we detail. In addition, to the extent conduct could be characterized as threatening, intimidating, or corruptly persuading witnesses, that too may provide additional grounds for obstruction charges.
While those defending the president may claim that expressing a hope that an investigation will end is too vague to constitute obstruction, we show that such language is
sufficient to do so. In that regard, it is material that former FBI Director James Comey interpreted the presidents hope that he would drop the investigation into Flynn as an
instruction to drop the case. That Comey ignored that instruction is beside the point under applicable law. We also note that potentially misleading conduct and possible cover
-up attempts could serve as further evidence of obstruction. Here, such actions may include fabricating an initial justification for firing Comey, directing Donald Trump Jr.s inaccurate statements about the purpose of his meeting with a Russian lawyer during the presidents campaign, tweeting that Comey better hope there are no tapes of our conversations, despite having no idea whether such tapes existed, and repeatedly denouncing the validity of the investigations.
Executive Summary
There are significant questions as to whether President Trump obstructed justice. We do not yet know all the relevant facts, and any final determination must await further investigation, including by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But the public record contains substantial evidence that President Trump attempted to impede the investigations
of Michael Flynn and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, including by firing FBI Director James Comey. There is also a question as to whether President Trump conspired to obstruct justice with senior members of his administration although the public facts regarding conspiracy are less well developed.
Attempts to stop an investigation represent a common form of obstruction. Demanding the loyalty of an individual involved in an investigation, requesting that individuals help to end the investigation, and then ultimately firing that person to accomplish that goal are the type of acts that have frequently resulted in obstruction convictions, as we detail. In addition, to the extent conduct could be characterized as threatening, intimidating, or corruptly persuading witnesses, that too may provide additional grounds for obstruction charges.
While those defending the president may claim that expressing a hope that an investigation will end is too vague to constitute obstruction, we show that such language is
sufficient to do so. In that regard, it is material that former FBI Director James Comey interpreted the presidents hope that he would drop the investigation into Flynn as an
instruction to drop the case. That Comey ignored that instruction is beside the point under applicable law. We also note that potentially misleading conduct and possible cover
-up attempts could serve as further evidence of obstruction. Here, such actions may include fabricating an initial justification for firing Comey, directing Donald Trump Jr.s inaccurate statements about the purpose of his meeting with a Russian lawyer during the presidents campaign, tweeting that Comey better hope there are no tapes of our conversations, despite having no idea whether such tapes existed, and repeatedly denouncing the validity of the investigations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PRESIDENTIAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: THE CASE OF DONALD J . TRUMP (Original Post)
Snarkoleptic
Oct 2017
OP
That's a lot of ground to cover, so I've been reading 8-10 pages at a time.
Snarkoleptic
Oct 2017
#3
SHRED
(28,136 posts)1. You can include the entire GOP
Their complicity equals guilt.
Gothmog
(145,260 posts)2. Great report
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)3. That's a lot of ground to cover, so I've been reading 8-10 pages at a time.
Gothmog
(145,260 posts)4. I have printed all 108 pages for some light reading