Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,069 posts)
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 12:33 PM Oct 2017

Bombshell Report Finds Trump Likely Obstructed Justice And Could Be Impeached

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/10/10/bombshell-report-finds-trump-obstructed-justice-impeached.html

Bombshell Report Finds Trump Likely Obstructed Justice And Could Be Impeached

By Jason Easley on Tue, Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:41 am

A 108-page analysis of Trump’s actions in the firing of James Comey done by the Brookings Institute concludes that the President likely obstructed justice and that Special Counsel Robert Mueller could recommend impeachment.

The report concluded:

presidential-obstruction-of-justice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-final

http://15130-presscdn-0-89.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/presidential-obstruction-of-justice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-final.pdf

The findings from Barry H. Berke, Noah Bookbinder, and Norm Eisen are so damning because they don’t contain conjecture. It is an analysis of the known facts and the laws involved with the behavior of Trump and his associates. The deliberations and discussions in the report likely mirror those that are going on with Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his staff.

Contrary to what Trump and the White House claim, the investigation is not fake news or a nothing burger. There are literally more than 100 pages of facts that support that this president has been violating the law while trying to sabotage the Russia investigation.

The cold hard truth is that Mueller might recommend that Trump is impeached, and if Republicans still control Congress, they could ignore his findings. This course of action would require them to put their necks on the line for Trump which is something that Congressional Republicans have shown no interest in doing. If Democrats control the House, and Mueller recommends impeachment, it is a certainty that Trump will face an impeachment trial in the Senate.

There is a lot riding on the 2018 election, and if America wants to rid itself of Trump the fastest way to do so would be to elect a Democratic House and Senate majority.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bombshell Report Finds Trump Likely Obstructed Justice And Could Be Impeached (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2017 OP
Likely? DID Iliyah Oct 2017 #1
If only we had some organization empowered to impeach a president Orrex Oct 2017 #2
Courto RICO...... global1 Oct 2017 #3
I don't want him impeached... Marie Marie Oct 2017 #40
I agree, Marie Marie. SergeStorms Oct 2017 #43
Barry H. Berke, Noah Bookbinder, and Norm Eisen: Please tell: lindysalsagal Oct 2017 #4
They consider themselves to be non-partisan... babylonsister Oct 2017 #9
Great! This is support for mueller, et. al. Drive the media. lindysalsagal Oct 2017 #17
Senators (and Reps) will be moved by toxic poll numbers tied to tRump. Then there'll be an avalanche Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #15
Yup. they will first get everything they can first. LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #24
Why would the Founding Fathers imbue a political institution Mr. Ected Oct 2017 #5
Our founding fathers did not want political parties, and expressed regret that they formed. eppur_se_muova Oct 2017 #8
Sole Authority Cheviteau Oct 2017 #26
congress has zero authority to adjudicate criminal matters. unblock Oct 2017 #46
Please. Anything. Just get him out of there as soon as possible. smirkymonkey Oct 2017 #6
The dirty lies of deception will soon be cleaned by pbmus Oct 2017 #7
Wanting this bad. eom sprinkleeninow Oct 2017 #31
Two things make me suspect this makes no difference Bettie Oct 2017 #10
Curious about your second point. Yonnie3 Oct 2017 #11
Because there would be talk about Bettie Oct 2017 #14
Thank you, I understand. Yonnie3 Oct 2017 #18
The Impeachment Hurt The Republicans? ProfessorGAC Oct 2017 #19
They didn't have congress locked up Bettie Oct 2017 #38
Alas, I suspect you will turn out to be correct PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #16
I'm a pessimist as well NewJeffCT Oct 2017 #34
108 pages and the best we get is likely? lame54 Oct 2017 #12
The GOP doesn't HAVE to impeach him no matter what he does. n/t pnwmom Oct 2017 #27
Tell us something we don't already know Tiggeroshii Oct 2017 #13
Direct links: L. Coyote Oct 2017 #20
"...if America wants to rid itself of Trump the fastest way to do so would be to elect a... LudwigPastorius Oct 2017 #21
Impeach and Turbo Reverse every illegitiate act he's done which is all of them bucolic_frolic Oct 2017 #22
Impeachment is a Political Solution not a Legal Solution. Ccarmona Oct 2017 #23
Aiding and Abetting/Obstruction Indictment. eom sprinkleeninow Oct 2017 #32
But they won't. frogmarch Oct 2017 #25
K&R... spanone Oct 2017 #28
Would that really be better? maltzmax Oct 2017 #29
Fat chance of electing Dems in 2018 stevepal Oct 2017 #30
DC is one bombshell short of Verdun. bluedigger Oct 2017 #33
Duh! malaise Oct 2017 #35
Just more evidence that will be ignored by Congress. Kablooie Oct 2017 #36
So this is what, the 99th impeachable offense that nothing will be done about? nt Binkie The Clown Oct 2017 #37
Impeachment required multiple things Nevernose Oct 2017 #39
"politicususa" is a garbage source, and should never be cited here. PBass Oct 2017 #41
Excuse me? babylonsister Oct 2017 #44
Could be. Won't be quakerboy Oct 2017 #42
a "senate majority" is completely irrelevant. unblock Oct 2017 #45
How many more shoes have to drop? Initech Oct 2017 #47

global1

(25,251 posts)
3. Courto RICO......
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 12:43 PM
Oct 2017

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) - if impeachment doesn't do Trump in maybe RICO will.

Then maybe then his orange jumpsuit will match his complexion.

Marie Marie

(9,999 posts)
40. I don't want him impeached...
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:11 PM
Oct 2017

I want him prosecuted and convicted. He is crooked and dirty, from the top of that ridiculous hair to the tips of his tiny fingers.

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
43. I agree, Marie Marie.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 03:09 AM
Oct 2017

I'll be satisfied with nothing less than a prison term for Trump, Manafort, Flynn, Trump Jr., Trump's Son-in-law and daughter, Eric Trump, Roger Stone, and a few others. I might settle for somewhat less for the others, but Trump and his crime family must pay for their crimes by time spent in prison.

lindysalsagal

(20,692 posts)
4. Barry H. Berke, Noah Bookbinder, and Norm Eisen: Please tell:
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 12:48 PM
Oct 2017

I don't follow politics closely enough toknow these names: Are these guys just democratic enthusiasts? Brookings institute: Is it easily dismissed as a leftist propaganda group? Please inform. Will any senators be moved by this?

babylonsister

(171,069 posts)
9. They consider themselves to be non-partisan...
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:07 PM
Oct 2017

Brookings states that its staff "represent diverse points of view" and describes itself as non-partisan,[1][15] and the media sometimes describes Brookings as either "conservative",[16] "centrist"[17] or "liberal."[18] An academic analysis of Congressional records from 1993 to 2002 found that Brookings was referenced by conservative politicians almost as frequently as liberal politicians, earning a score of 53 on a 1–100 scale with 100 representing the most liberal score.[19] The same study found Brookings to be the most frequently cited think tank by the US media and politicians.[19]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution

lindysalsagal

(20,692 posts)
17. Great! This is support for mueller, et. al. Drive the media.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:32 PM
Oct 2017

Gives them questions to ask. Glad to see the heavy hitters doing their own math and investigating.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,174 posts)
24. Yup. they will first get everything they can first.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 02:29 PM
Oct 2017

Using Trump as a shield to pass all kinds of awful legislation. Trump is not the only one wanting to piss on anything Obama slept on. Mitch wanted to erase him from the moment he was elected, where his grand plan was to make Obama a one term President. And then, if that went to plan, I'm sure was going to dismantle anything Obama had accomplished at that point.

Like wringing out a towel. They will squeeze every last drop of stale orange piss from it first before discarding it. I agree, it will then be like a multi-domino effect. Rats jumping ship.

And then I predict, Mitch, Ryan, and other GOP leaders will try and come out and say "Gosh....we never would have guessed!...We are all shocked and dismayed at the Presidents behaviour"

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
5. Why would the Founding Fathers imbue a political institution
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 12:51 PM
Oct 2017

With the sole authority to adjudicate criminal matters perpetrated by a member of the executive branch?

Seems like a flaw in the game plan.

Perhaps they didn't foresee the us vs. them political game that our system has devolved into.

eppur_se_muova

(36,266 posts)
8. Our founding fathers did not want political parties, and expressed regret that they formed.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:06 PM
Oct 2017

Unfortunately, parties are pretty much inevitable, as is any viable survival strategy, however harmful.

Cheviteau

(383 posts)
26. Sole Authority
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 02:34 PM
Oct 2017

Whether The House is the sole authority has never been tested. Can a sitting president be indicted? We don't yet know but, I have a strong suspicion we are about to find out. The House and Senate are the two bodies that can remove a president from office. That clause in the Constitution does not prevent a sitting president from being indicted and tried in a criminal court. That is my opinion. It may be Bob Mueller's as well.

unblock

(52,243 posts)
46. congress has zero authority to adjudicate criminal matters.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:21 PM
Oct 2017

impeachment and removal is solely concerned with removal from office, and is not specifically tied to criminal law.

abuse of office and nebulous crimes against the country be considered grounds for impeachment even if not covered by criminal law. congress doesn't need to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.


some people have made the argument that a sitting president can't be tried in criminal court, or perhaps can't even be indicted on a criminal charge, until he leaves office one way or another.

personally i find this a ludicrous argument. the founders, who were very keen on trying to prevent tyranny, surely would never agree that a president should be above the law, even temporarily. aside from that, there's nothing in the constitution that says that impeachment and removal is the *only* potential consequence of breaking the law. just because congress can remove him doesn't mean that the government can't also try and imprison him.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
6. Please. Anything. Just get him out of there as soon as possible.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 12:51 PM
Oct 2017

We can't take much more of this insanity.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
7. The dirty lies of deception will soon be cleaned by
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 12:52 PM
Oct 2017

The sunlight of truth ... Mueller time is coming soon...

Bettie

(16,110 posts)
10. Two things make me suspect this makes no difference
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:11 PM
Oct 2017

First: currently, Republicans would have to move on impeachment. That will never happen. This guy is their ID, most of them are all there for his message, just not for the delivery.

Second: if Dems take back the house and senate, I suspect the first utterance from the leadership will be "impeachment is off the table".

Yonnie3

(17,442 posts)
11. Curious about your second point.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:17 PM
Oct 2017

Why do you think impeachment would be off the table?

Would this be in order to a better chance of passing legislation?

I'm genuinely curious and don't have an opinion formed about this yet.

Bettie

(16,110 posts)
14. Because there would be talk about
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:23 PM
Oct 2017

the optics going into 2020 and the presidential election.

Also, because the (unwarranted) impeachment of Bill Clinton hurt the Republicans.

Finally, because that was Pelosi's stand with regard to W.

I just have no faith that there is any way out of this nightmare.

Yonnie3

(17,442 posts)
18. Thank you, I understand.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:45 PM
Oct 2017

Nothing would please me more than seeing the boot applied to 45's posterior, but there are indeed other issues.

ProfessorGAC

(65,058 posts)
19. The Impeachment Hurt The Republicans?
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:46 PM
Oct 2017

Really? They wrested control of the WH in 2000 in the middle of an economic boom. How bad did it really hurt them?

Bettie

(16,110 posts)
38. They didn't have congress locked up
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 05:16 PM
Oct 2017

and that is what congresscritters care about.

I hope I'm wrong, I really do, but I don't think Dems have the will to impeach him.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,861 posts)
16. Alas, I suspect you will turn out to be correct
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:31 PM
Oct 2017

that if the Dems are in the majority in the House and Senate after 2018 that their first words will be "impeachment is off the table."

I hope you turn out to be wrong, but that's the sort of thing they've been doing for years.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
34. I'm a pessimist as well
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 03:19 PM
Oct 2017

but, I don't think impeachment will be off the table this time around. I think there is just too much out there already to even try to stop impeachment. If they hold hearings, I think there will be so much laid out there that many Republicans will join with them as well.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
20. Direct links:
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:53 PM
Oct 2017

And lots more here: Trump's New Impeachable Offenses: Obstruction of Justice, Conspiracy, Abuse of Power

The Brookings Institution Report: Presidential obstruction of justice: The case of Donald J. Trump

Barry H. Berke, Noah Bookbinder, and Norman Eisen -- October 10, 2017

Note: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a party (and is providing representation to other parties) in active litigation involving President Trump and the administration. Noah Bookbinder is the executive director and Norman Eisen is the chair and co-founder of CREW. Barry Berke and Kramer Levin are outside pro bono counsel to CREW.

.... Finally, one crucial caveat that is important to note: the publication of this paper comes at a time when our understanding of the facts is still developing and without the benefit of the investigative tools that a prosecutor (or even a defense attorney) might employ. While we fully expect that our understanding of the facts relevant to this case will improve in the weeks and months ahead, we believe that the analysis we provide and the precedents we have collected will be relevant to the discussion regardless of what the investigations by Special Counsel Mueller and by Congress uncover. ....


LudwigPastorius

(9,150 posts)
21. "...if America wants to rid itself of Trump the fastest way to do so would be to elect a...
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 01:53 PM
Oct 2017

Democratic House and Senate majority."

That's some tough sledding ahead:

http://cookpolitical.com/analysis/house/house-overview/democrats-could-use-few-more-gop-house-retirements


http://cookpolitical.com/analysis/senate/senate-overview/democrats-face-steep-climb-win-back-senate


Of course, a bombshell from Mueller could significantly influence the midterms and perhaps the willingness of a few GOP congressmen to consider impeachment and removal. Barring that, I'm afraid the only way that Trump is out is if he resigns or does something so egregiously dangerous and demented that those around him invoke the 25th Amendment.

 

Ccarmona

(1,180 posts)
23. Impeachment is a Political Solution not a Legal Solution.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 02:27 PM
Oct 2017

Mueller’s group is impaneled to investigate and answer if any laws were broken. If there were, then Mueller would go to the Courts to obtain a Indictment and send the case to trial. That OP is offering an opinion about Impeachment, since that would only be up to the House of Representatives. Mueller wouldn’t intervene or recommend Impeachment since he could be called as a Witness.

 

maltzmax

(19 posts)
29. Would that really be better?
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 02:51 PM
Oct 2017

If Trump serves two years and is then impeached, Pence will then be president. Pence would then serve two years, but be allowed to serve two full terms after that if he is elected.

 

stevepal

(109 posts)
30. Fat chance of electing Dems in 2018
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 03:03 PM
Oct 2017

as long as the vote is counted on easily hacked (by Russian hackers as easily as anybody else) computers.

Rots-a-Ruck.

You need a democracy to manage things like people voting rascals out of office, and you can't have a democracy when the vote is counted on easily hacked, unverifiable (or never verified) electronic voting machines.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
36. Just more evidence that will be ignored by Congress.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 03:38 PM
Oct 2017

Yawn.

Until Dems hold the house Trump will remain the symbol and soul of the US.
He could walk into Congress with a gun and start killing Congressmen and they would do nothing.

Our only hope is the 2018 election.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
39. Impeachment required multiple things
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 05:28 PM
Oct 2017

Not only would Democrats have to win back both houses — because there could be video of Trump selling Putin the actual, original Declaration of Independence and Republicans wouldn’t give a shit — but they’d have to have the 3/5ths and 2/3rds majorities needed to even bother with it (see the aforementioned “Declaration of Independence Voter Loss” theory).

It’s just not going to happen. We have to get majorities in Congress, and we have to win back our state houses. That’s our only way forward as far as I can tell.

PBass

(1,537 posts)
41. "politicususa" is a garbage source, and should never be cited here.
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 10:26 PM
Oct 2017

Sorry, but just because you happen to like the message, doesn't mean you should be citing this source of fake news.

DU should have a list of websites that cannot be cited as a source.

Also, STOP DAYDREAMING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.

babylonsister

(171,069 posts)
44. Excuse me?
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:01 AM
Oct 2017

The message came with a link to the report; do tell how that's not legitimate, or 'fake news' (did you make up that expression?).

And stop counseling!

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
42. Could be. Won't be
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 01:54 AM
Oct 2017

Republicans are running the show. And they don't care about the law, or breaking it. They are making it clearer by the day they dont even care about the appearance of breaking the law.

I find it hard to believe this level of arrogance hasn't secured its electoral backing one way or another before being willing to "go public" with their disregard for the law and the citizens.

And they have the court.

They aren't going to let us have majorities in the house, or the senate, unless they know full well they have enough of the purported democrats under their thumbs to render the numbers harmless. Zellers, Liebermans, etc.

unblock

(52,243 posts)
45. a "senate majority" is completely irrelevant.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:07 PM
Oct 2017

a house majority is certainly important in terms of whether or not donnie gets impeached.

but then a trail automatically happens in the senate, whether we have a majority or not.

and removal requires 2/3rds of the senate. a majority has nothing to do with that, aside from the fact that it means we need slightly fewer republicans to agree. in any event, we can't do it without the help of a meaningful numbers of republicans -- 16, even if we have the senate 51-49.


of course, a senate majority would be great for other reasons, particularly in terms of appointments. just not for removal after impeachment. it doesn't really help on that front.

Initech

(100,079 posts)
47. How many more shoes have to drop?
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 12:23 PM
Oct 2017

He's had an entire warehouse full of shoes drop and nothing has been done!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bombshell Report Finds Tr...