General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJimmy Kimmel on Weinstein: "I'm not defending Hillary Clinton. . . "
http://www.newsweek.com/jimmy-kimmel-roasts-donald-trump-and-harvey-weinstein-hillary-clinton-took-681373Im not defending Hillary Clinton. Her campaign did take money from what turned out to be a high-profile man who has been accused of sexual harassment multiple times. But not just one of them, by the wayshe took money from two of them: Harvey Weinstein and Donald Trump.
Kimmel flashed images of Clinton posing with both Weinstein and Trump, who did indeed donate to her presidential campaign in 2008.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,004 posts)Orrex
(63,213 posts)It's so that the idiot racist fuckheads who voted for self-professed rapist Trump can't complain about Clinton for taking money from a sexual predator.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)The two men did, so why is she being held responsible by the media
JI7
(89,250 posts)It's just using anything to attack her.
JI7
(89,250 posts)Is those attacking her support a sexual predator for president.
Me.
(35,454 posts)This, Puerto Rico, taking a knee...anything because that woman had the temerity to run for pres
get the red out
(13,466 posts)Why would she be to blame if Weinstein hadn't been outed yet?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Weinstein had settled with NDAs. On the other hand Trump supporters went out and voted for a guy who bragged about committing sexual assault.
get the red out
(13,466 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)so it is bad if you are supported by a bad guy?
Would that not include KKK and other racists, who voted for the Orange Toxin? The Rs should be shamed for that then.