General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHas America ever been as divided as it is now ?
Yes I am aware of the sixties, the eighteen sixties and the nineteen sixties, but I would argue we are even more divided.
If I had my druthers I wouldn't even share an area code with a Deplorable and I am sure they feel the same. I can't think of one thing I have in common with them other than sharing a land mass.
5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
4 (80%) |
|
No | |
1 (20%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
imanamerican63
(13,795 posts)Family, friends, neighbors, co-workers are all at each others throats! But this did not start with Trump or Obama! This has been going on for decades! Now, we have 24 hour media and the internet to put gas on kindling flames!
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)You can have a Deplorable as a neighbor.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)As they grew increasingly frustrated by the failure of President Jeffersons and Madisons policies of economic sanctions to win concessions from the British, a faction of congressmen known as the War Hawks began calling for more decisive and aggressive measures.
On June 1, 1812 President James Madison sent his war message to Congress. That message outlined what he believed to be Americas chief diplomatic grievances with Britain: impressment, the British Orders in Council, and Britains incitement of Indian warfare on Americas western frontier.
The Constitution gives the power to declare war to Congress. No Congress had exercised that power in the countrys nearly 25-year history. But in June 1812, the House and Senate narrowly approved the measure declaring war on the British. President Madison signed the Congressional war measures into law on June 18, 1812, marking the official commencement of the hostilities.
But enthusiasm for war against Britain was hardly unanimous. The vote in the House was 79 to 49; nearly four in ten representatives voted against the measure. The vote in the Senate was even closer, with 19 senators in favor and 13 opposed. It remains the closest vote in Americas five formally-declared wars.
And the vote occurred along strictly partisan lines. All 98 of the congressmen who voted for the war were Republicans. (Even within the Republican party, support for the war was hardly unanimous: one-quarter of Republicans either voted against the measure or abstained from the vote.) Not a single Federalist voted for the war. The partisan divisions led critics to later pronounce the War of 1812 "Mr. Madison's War."
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)I would probably answer in some ways, yes, in other ways, no.
I think unless one goes through each of the division points themselves and at a similar age (hence ability to comprehend first hand), it is impossible to answer any more clearly.
As an early 60 something, this is the worst I've experienced - but an older friend who was directly impacted by Vietnam thinks that it was worse back then.
unblock
(52,230 posts)more deaths, by far, than in any other american war, and more deaths than all other american wars combined until vietnam.
it's possible we get to that level of division, but we might not; and in any event, we're certainly not there yet.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)And most folks don't have the martial spirit that existed then.
unblock
(52,230 posts)our civil war, and some others, have had convenient geographical borders, but that's not always the case.
remember that even in our civil war, there were border areas and families had to decide which side to send their kids to fight for.
many opted to send some kids to each side, so as to increase the chances of someone in the family being on the winning side, the better to hopefully save the rest.
plus, if it happens it won't be based on ideology. it will be based on race, ethnicity, etc.
they won't quiz people on politics, they'll just kill people with dark skin, spanish accents, and religious headgear.
Corvo Bianco
(1,148 posts)We wade in and out of relative peace depending on whether the Nazis are hiding or marching.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)It's easy to forget (or be unfamiliar with, if you weren't around then) the intense animosity arising from the civil rights and antiwar movements. There were riots in which whole neighborhoods burned down; protesters were regularly beaten up by police; there was Kent State; buildings were bombed; and RFK and MLK were assassinated. Some really, really ugly shit was going down; and people, including family members, became enemies just as now. I had screaming fights with my dad over the war, and I know a lot of other people who fought like wolverines with their families.
I think the divisions between the political parties is worse now than it was then, but the arguments between individuals with different viewpoints were just as intense and furious.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)My father was extremely liberal, but he fucking hated the anti-war movement and "hippies" and still does to this day.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If I had a teacher who liked Trump i would have loathed him or her.
Thankfully my teachers were relatively liberal and I grew up in the exurban south.
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But that 40% controls all three branches of government. The Founding Fathers' fear of the "tyranny of the majority" is stood on its head. We are suffering under the tyranny of the minority.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Particularly the right-wing groups. Until the availability of a dedicated cable news network and the internet, their voice had been somewhat diluted and diffused, easier to dismiss as a lunatic fringe, etc. But the web gave them everything from watering-hole message boards, to broad-based attack site like Breitbart. Its empowered and emboldened the right wing to say the least.
As for the divide, it would appear that this current schism is deeper and more clear-cut than anything that came before in the U.S., in terms of scope. The middle or centrist setting has all but disappeared. You are either left or right, with us or against us, so goes an ideologues declaration.
The latest data informs that the sharpest political divides are between large urban concentrations and more rural regions.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The research indicates the further you live from your neighbor the more likely you are to be a Deplorable, i.e. a Trump partisan.