Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 02:48 PM Oct 2017

Has America ever been as divided as it is now ?

Yes I am aware of the sixties, the eighteen sixties and the nineteen sixties, but I would argue we are even more divided.

If I had my druthers I wouldn't even share an area code with a Deplorable and I am sure they feel the same. I can't think of one thing I have in common with them other than sharing a land mass.


5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
4 (80%)
No
1 (20%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has America ever been as divided as it is now ? (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 OP
At least not that I can remember! imanamerican63 Oct 2017 #1
Civil War Not Ruth Oct 2017 #2
We were divided by geographical lines. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #3
War of 1812 against Brits Not Ruth Oct 2017 #4
each generation is so different - and it is hard to directly compare NRaleighLiberal Oct 2017 #5
brothers killed each other. we lost a full 2% of our entire population over the course of 4 years. unblock Oct 2017 #6
A Civil War is unfathomable because the divisions are ideological, not geographical. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #13
it is fathomable, at least in the sense that a convenient geographical border isn't a requirement unblock Oct 2017 #17
I think it's always divided Corvo Bianco Oct 2017 #7
The late 1960s were pretty crazy. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2017 #8
the cleavages got to be pretty four dimensional Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #12
I think people were a lot more divided at the peak of the anti-war movement than today Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #9
I was in junior high school and had teachers who favored Vietnamization who I didn't loathe. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #10
Is 60-30 "divided"? brooklynite Oct 2017 #11
That is actually a good point but the division is closer to 60-40 DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #14
The advent of cable TV & the internet transformed sparks into a raging fire. VOX Oct 2017 #15
The latest data informs that the sharpest political divides are between large urban concentrations. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #16

imanamerican63

(13,795 posts)
1. At least not that I can remember!
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 02:52 PM
Oct 2017

Family, friends, neighbors, co-workers are all at each others throats! But this did not start with Trump or Obama! This has been going on for decades! Now, we have 24 hour media and the internet to put gas on kindling flames!

 

Not Ruth

(3,613 posts)
4. War of 1812 against Brits
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 02:56 PM
Oct 2017
https://www.nps.gov/articles/mr-madison-s-war.htm

As they grew increasingly frustrated by the failure of President Jefferson’s and Madison’s policies of economic sanctions to win concessions from the British, a faction of congressmen known as the War Hawks began calling for more decisive and aggressive measures.

On June 1, 1812 President James Madison sent his war message to Congress. That message outlined what he believed to be America’s chief diplomatic grievances with Britain: impressment, the British Orders in Council, and Britain’s incitement of Indian warfare on America’s western frontier.

The Constitution gives the power to declare war to Congress. No Congress had exercised that power in the country’s nearly 25-year history. But in June 1812, the House and Senate narrowly approved the measure declaring war on the British. President Madison signed the Congressional war measures into law on June 18, 1812, marking the official commencement of the hostilities.

But enthusiasm for war against Britain was hardly unanimous. The vote in the House was 79 to 49; nearly four in ten representatives voted against the measure. The vote in the Senate was even closer, with 19 senators in favor and 13 opposed. It remains the closest vote in America’s five formally-declared wars.

And the vote occurred along strictly partisan lines. All 98 of the congressmen who voted for the war were Republicans. (Even within the Republican party, support for the war was hardly unanimous: one-quarter of Republicans either voted against the measure or abstained from the vote.) Not a single Federalist voted for the war. The partisan divisions led critics to later pronounce the War of 1812 "Mr. Madison's War."

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
5. each generation is so different - and it is hard to directly compare
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 02:57 PM
Oct 2017

I would probably answer in some ways, yes, in other ways, no.

I think unless one goes through each of the division points themselves and at a similar age (hence ability to comprehend first hand), it is impossible to answer any more clearly.

As an early 60 something, this is the worst I've experienced - but an older friend who was directly impacted by Vietnam thinks that it was worse back then.

unblock

(52,230 posts)
6. brothers killed each other. we lost a full 2% of our entire population over the course of 4 years.
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 02:58 PM
Oct 2017

more deaths, by far, than in any other american war, and more deaths than all other american wars combined until vietnam.


it's possible we get to that level of division, but we might not; and in any event, we're certainly not there yet.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
13. A Civil War is unfathomable because the divisions are ideological, not geographical.
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:06 PM
Oct 2017

And most folks don't have the martial spirit that existed then.

unblock

(52,230 posts)
17. it is fathomable, at least in the sense that a convenient geographical border isn't a requirement
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:55 PM
Oct 2017

our civil war, and some others, have had convenient geographical borders, but that's not always the case.

remember that even in our civil war, there were border areas and families had to decide which side to send their kids to fight for.
many opted to send some kids to each side, so as to increase the chances of someone in the family being on the winning side, the better to hopefully save the rest.

plus, if it happens it won't be based on ideology. it will be based on race, ethnicity, etc.
they won't quiz people on politics, they'll just kill people with dark skin, spanish accents, and religious headgear.

Corvo Bianco

(1,148 posts)
7. I think it's always divided
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 02:59 PM
Oct 2017

We wade in and out of relative peace depending on whether the Nazis are hiding or marching.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,693 posts)
8. The late 1960s were pretty crazy.
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:00 PM
Oct 2017

It's easy to forget (or be unfamiliar with, if you weren't around then) the intense animosity arising from the civil rights and antiwar movements. There were riots in which whole neighborhoods burned down; protesters were regularly beaten up by police; there was Kent State; buildings were bombed; and RFK and MLK were assassinated. Some really, really ugly shit was going down; and people, including family members, became enemies just as now. I had screaming fights with my dad over the war, and I know a lot of other people who fought like wolverines with their families.

I think the divisions between the political parties is worse now than it was then, but the arguments between individuals with different viewpoints were just as intense and furious.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
12. the cleavages got to be pretty four dimensional
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:05 PM
Oct 2017

My father was extremely liberal, but he fucking hated the anti-war movement and "hippies" and still does to this day.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
10. I was in junior high school and had teachers who favored Vietnamization who I didn't loathe.
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:04 PM
Oct 2017

If I had a teacher who liked Trump i would have loathed him or her.

Thankfully my teachers were relatively liberal and I grew up in the exurban south.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
14. That is actually a good point but the division is closer to 60-40
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:09 PM
Oct 2017

But that 40% controls all three branches of government. The Founding Fathers' fear of the "tyranny of the majority" is stood on its head. We are suffering under the tyranny of the minority.

VOX

(22,976 posts)
15. The advent of cable TV & the internet transformed sparks into a raging fire.
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:13 PM
Oct 2017

Particularly the right-wing groups. Until the availability of a dedicated cable “news” network and the internet, their voice had been somewhat diluted and diffused, easier to dismiss as a lunatic fringe, etc. But the web gave them everything from watering-hole message boards, to broad-based attack site like Breitbart. It’s empowered and emboldened the right wing to say the least.

As for the divide, it would appear that this current schism is deeper and more clear-cut than anything that came before in the U.S., in terms of scope. The “middle” or centrist setting has all but disappeared. You are either left or right, “with us or against us,” so goes an ideologue’s declaration.

The latest data informs that the sharpest political divides are between large urban concentrations and more rural regions.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
16. The latest data informs that the sharpest political divides are between large urban concentrations.
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 03:16 PM
Oct 2017

The research indicates the further you live from your neighbor the more likely you are to be a Deplorable, i.e. a Trump partisan.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has America ever been as ...