But he knows where his votes come from.

His comment suggests the former are preternaturally bad with money and the latter are preternaturally good with it. It portrays the African American as Sambo and the Jew as Shylock.

And i suspect Trump accusing a class of people of being "good with money" would to him be a major compliment. He seems to care more about money than anything else.

Pretty funny that people capable of being passionate white supremacists are more functional, whole people than this miswired fraction of a man.

But he doesn't appear to hate it either.

including an unrestrained, unexamined indulgence in his biases.

But imo he's literally incapable of focusing beyond himself to larger groups enough to develop a supremacist ideology. Or, as said, any ideology at all.

He does clearly prefer to be surrounded by white men, is clearly biased in their favor, and clearly sees them as at least somewhat superior to others. But that's not an ideology, and it's not a goal even for his party.

His words and actions have supported and legitimized people and ideas that promote white supremacy.

Hairsplitting, I know, but there is a difference.

... opportunistic asshole coddling votes and "ratings". He would throw the White Supremacists under the bus in a heartbeat if it somehow looked to benefit him and give him a bump in the polls. He would throw ANYONE under that same bus for the same reason.

He's a narcissistic, selfish, emotionally stunted coward. His deep insecurities about being a failure at just about everything he's ever tried to do can only be pushed aside if he can feed his fantasies about how people love him. And he doesn't know what "love" is because he's personally incapable of that emotion. The cheering of a crowd of white supremacists is, in his mind, "love". So he supports them for the cheers. If PETA members came out in droves and cheered him, he'd support them too.

I don't think he's loyal to the United States, his staff, his business partners, Russia, Putin, Bannon, republicans, republican policy, or even the 1%. He's loyal to himself and his perceived image. Period. No deeper psychological analysis is needed.

Nothing Supreme about him

He's one of the biggest arguments against white supremacy that I've just about ever seen.