General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wonder if there's some way for state forfeiture laws to be used against Trump?
They have been used in money-laundering cases, and they don't require a criminal conviction. If he knowingly let people launder money through his condos or his other properties . . .
And he wouldn't be able to pardon his buildings.
Ironically, Jeff Sessions might have made this possible by rolling back some Obama era curbs on civil-asset forfeiture.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/sessions-forfeiture-justice-department-civil/534168/
Attorney General Jeff Sessions rolled back a series of Obama-era curbs on civil-asset forfeiture on Wednesday, strengthening the federal governments power to seize cash and property from Americans without first bringing criminal charges against them.
In a statement announcing the Justice Departments new policy directive, Sessions described civil forfeiture as a key tool that helps law enforcement defund organized crime, take back ill-gotten gains, and prevent new crimes from being committed. He also cast it as part of his larger push to imprint the presidents hardline stance on criminal-justice matters onto the federal governments tactics against crime.
President Trump has directed this Department of Justice to reduce crime in this country, and we will use every lawful tool that we have to do that, he said at a gathering of law-enforcement officials on Wednesday. We will continue to encourage civil-asset forfeiture whenever appropriate in order to hit organized crime in the wallet.
The directive revives the Justice Departments Equitable Sharing Program, a controversial process through which state and local police agencies can seize assets, then transfer those seizures to federal control. In doing so, local agencies can skirt some state-level regulations limiting forfeitures. Under the program, the federal government pools the funds derived from the assets and sends 80 percent of them back to the state or local department itself, sometimes evading state laws that say seized assets should go into a states general fund.
icymist
(15,888 posts)And there shouldn't be.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)SonofDonald
(2,050 posts)Doesn't that give them the right to take property/assets?