General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo sad that "oh so great" leader got rid of regulations that would prevent the
mentally challenged to have access to guns. Why, God, have you have punished us with the "Son of Satan?"
Straw Man
(6,624 posts)Yeah, there was that pesky due process issue.
Voltaire2
(13,038 posts)Or the previous white guy with a gun? Or the one before that? The problem is not "mentally challenged" people have access to guns, the problem is people have access to guns that are designed to kill large numbers of people.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)Voltaire2
(13,038 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)And portions of problems can be fixed. There need not be one solution that fixes every aspect of every problem at once.
Voltaire2
(13,038 posts)from gun purchases would be effective is what?
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)And they can be fixed individually, and even partially.
A favorite ploy of gun rights people is to insist that any potential solution fix all aspects of all problems at once. It isn't worth doing unless it fixes absolutely everything (mostly because they appear to want to do nothing).
"Will it stop ALL mass murders? No? No good, can't be done." That's the line of people who are either afraid that their firearms are in danger or profit from sales of firearms. These people will argue to death against anything that could possibly restrict firearms in any manner. No point in arguing against them, so I generally avoid it.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)It wasnt actually a measure that block people who were mentally ill. It was one that blocked people who had another person designated their representative payee for Social Security no matter why they did so, with no due process.
And in this case there is zero evidence that it would have affected this at all, so bringing it up in relation to it is dishonest nonsense.