General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGaryCnf
(1,399 posts)The MSM is calling the "good guy with a gun" who confronted Kelley AFTER the SHOOTING WAS OVER a "hero" for "preventing more dead."
The only "future victim" in Kelley's mind was HIMSELF. When it comes to "preventing more dead," the "good guy with a gun" was a complete failure.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)This guy chased him. I'm not going to rag on this guy...regardless, he sprang into action and tried to help....then got in his vehicle to follow him. I see no reason to fault him.
onenote
(42,704 posts)Your fantasy about him going somewhere else to continue his carnage is just that - fantasy.
What I'd like to know is what kind of rifle the neighbor had.
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)He very well could have went to their house. We had someone here do that. Went after 2 he had a grudge against. Hr knew he was going to jail so settled all his beefs.
He probably expected her to be at the service..
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Being that he didn't kill his ex-wife or her mother who seemed to be the fuel of his anger, you absolutely don't know what or where he was going next.
I don't think it was a good idea for this other dude to chase him, but for you to be so rude as to lecture another poster as if you know better what happened in this psycho's mind is absurd.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)How was he supposed to know that the shooter was out of ammo for his semi-automatic weapon? I'm impressed by his courage, but I'm glad he wasn't turned into a killer as well.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)He sprayed 400 rounds in the church and left because his mags were on empty.
I heard he had handguns in his vehicle.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)There's plenty to talk about here without ragging on folks who did right...
Get off your high horse...
GaryCnf
(1,399 posts)It takes major courage to put yourself in the line of fire under any circumstances.
I do have a problem with the "good guy with a gun stops a bad guy with a gun" NRA-inspired narrative that is being swallowed by the media. As the authorities have stated, this was a targeted attack, not just random violence. It stopped because the murderer's objective had been achieved.
I apologize if I was unclear.
onenote
(42,704 posts)He targeted that specific church because of its connection to his wife's family.
Get real.
B2G
(9,766 posts)His next stop may have been her house, but we'll never know.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)And find the intended target or more people close to/associated with them.
I dont think this guy was finished.
Until he was.
NickB79
(19,246 posts)Drive calmly to the nearest police station and turn himself in?
Even the best-case scenario would have him engaging police in a shootout.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)Apparently he told his dad he was hit and didnt think hed survive. Then he blew his brains out.
brush
(53,782 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)just to make sure their gun is working. That's always my advice.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)It's like it has become a "fashion" of sorts to take others with you - if he decides to kill himself, no one else has to go. Like all these shootings and that pilot who took the German plane down.
liquid diamond
(1,917 posts)liquid diamond
(1,917 posts)They dont kill themselves first because in their minds they have a score to settle with those who wronged them. They could also be suffering and want to drag others down with them. If they are going to commit suicide, they have nothing to lose by killing others first. Their victims deaths are a bonus to them. The killers get to exert power over others that theyve never had.
If your question was rhetorical, I apologize.
brush
(53,782 posts)liquid diamond
(1,917 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)...the sad fact is that a large number of guys who blow their brains out probably contemplated taking people out with them and decided not to. We hear about the mass killers, the family killers, because they were the ones who wanted to take someone down with them, and did so. We don't hear much about the deceased man who had a family who killed himself in a hotel room.
malaise
(269,022 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 6, 2017, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)
He said he phoned his father, told him he had been shot and didn't think he'd make it.
The guy who drove the one who stopped the gunman said they don't know if they hit him. Killer lost control of the vehicle which suggests that he had been shot.
I was more than puzzled when he said that he killed himself.
sarisataka
(18,656 posts)He knew he was shot and bleeding, soon he would pass out.
The two people chasing him meant he couldn't get to help without police learning where he was.
He feared prison more than death so before or after crashing he shot himself to ensure he died rather than be taken into custody and getting medical attention.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Saying that it was self-inflicted removes any need for them to bring charges of any kind against hose two.
Which no one wants.
A couple posters here seem to have an odd amount of sympathy tor a man that slaughtered a dozen children.
But to each their own.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)And even if it was the citizen who responded who shot him I dont see a snowballs chance in hell of any charges under Texas law.
B2G
(9,766 posts)According to the presser I just watched.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)He did not want to be taken alive..
One was to the head.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Not to say that one of those other shots might not have be fatal.
B2G
(9,766 posts)By the neighbor at the scene.
Haven't seen a description of those wounds yet.
Aristus
(66,380 posts)Some quick-draw artist...
malaise
(269,022 posts)The problem is that 27 people were already dead.
NickB79
(19,246 posts)The guy came running with his own rifle from across the street when he heard gunshots and risked his life to stop the shooter from leaving. He was there within a minute or two of the first shot fired. You make it sound like he was in the church just kicking back while the shooter attacked.
There are a lot of bad people to rag on in this tragedy. This guy isn't one of them. I don't care if it feeds the "good guy with a gun" mythos the GOP loves so much; it stopped more bloodshed and innocent lives lost.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)I am amazed at how many people want to criticize or all bad about a person who risked his life to help others because he wasnt instant or perfectZ
I wonder how many people criticizing him have ever done something anywhere close to as dangerous or stressful solely to help others in danger, since they are so perfect to throw stones at how they man performed.....
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)The kind of selfless courage to run toward gunfire and screams is pretty damn amazing.
I'm sure he wishes he's have been a couple minutes faster and could have ventilated the bastard's brain-bucket and saved a few innocent lives.
I don't think he earned an eye-roll emoji.
liquid diamond
(1,917 posts)sarisataka
(18,656 posts)Than the police
CountAllVotes
(20,875 posts)n/t
Baconator
(1,459 posts)Go to your room and come back when you are ready to talk with the adults...
I swear...
Aristus
(66,380 posts)Unfortunately, so are the 'good guy with a gun' types. They actually believe that if everyone goes around packing, it will prevent gun massacres.
This is pretty clear, positive proof that this is not the case.
So he shot the perp. So what? It was too late to do any good.
And the 'he might have been on his way to commit another massacre' argument is a pretty callous way of ignoring the victims.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)There are arguments for and against by what percentage increases or decreases in the amount of guns will affect things.
28 dead is preferable to 29 dead... That's a fact and does not ignore the 28.
Aristus
(66,380 posts)We need to elevate our standards for heroes. At this stage, working for comprehensive, enforceable gun regulation could be considered an act of true heroism. Considering the frightening array of evil forces allied against such a person.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)... and there is a statistically significant chance that a civilian could help end one of these mass shootings. As we just saw...
That isn't the case for legislative solutions that eliminate the threat.
hunter
(38,316 posts)... wait, what?
These "good guy with a gun" narratives are so damned stupid.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Denying the apparent truth because it might help the pro gun cause is disingenuous.
If neither of them were armed with military style weapons the people in that church would still be alive. That is the point we need to make.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)ClarendonDem
(720 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)ClarendonDem
(720 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Ok, got it. From killing number 28, 29, 30. Need I go on? The killer shot up the church but did not find his ex or his inlaws. So he was leaving. And the heroic guy across the street puts a bullet in him. Then chases him as he leaves.
The reason he killed himself appears to be because he was injured and could not go on.
Do not confuse my ability to see events as they happened with thinking it ok to own these weapons. It is crazy we allow it. But I have admiration for anyone putting their ass on the line to prevent the continuation of a heinous crime.
brush
(53,782 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Is really not that hard a concept. Im amazed people lack the ability to comprehend it.
dumbcat
(2,120 posts)they just don't want to admit it. Destroys their narrative.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)could have stopped the carnage before there were nearly this many fatalities. As it is the first ten deaths are virtually assured anytime a nut want to kill as many people as he wants - with or without any good guys with guns being around to stop them.