Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,898 posts)
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 07:17 PM Nov 2017

In the Tax Bill: Rights for the unborn

Rights for the unborn

As does the House version of the plan, the Senate proposal includes a definition of an unborn child and stipulates that they are eligible for a college savings account.

For the purposes of opening a 529 saving account, the text reads, "an unborn child means a child in utero, and the term child in utero means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."

Currently, even without a change to the tax code, parents can open 529 accounts in their own names before children are born and change the beneficiaries at a later time. There are no tax consequences for changing the beneficiary to another family member, according to the IRS.

Anti-abortion-rights groups had praised the similar House provision.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/15/politics/senate-tax-bill-amendments-special-interests-industry-groups/index.html
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In the Tax Bill: Rights for the unborn (Original Post) spanone Nov 2017 OP
This is why no one should ever ever deprioritize women's issues as identity stuff or use the SJ bettyellen Nov 2017 #1
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
1. This is why no one should ever ever deprioritize women's issues as identity stuff or use the SJ
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 07:31 PM
Nov 2017

Tag as some sort of pejorative. Never again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the Tax Bill: Rights ...