Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jesus Christ. Days after leaking over 210,000++ gallons of oil, Nebraska approved the Keystone XL (Original Post) CousinIT Nov 2017 OP
Nebraska, goddam gratuitous Nov 2017 #1
Six railcars. WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2017 #2
Guess they don't like drinking water. Vinca Nov 2017 #3
210000 gallons is a cube 30.4 feet on a side. FarCenter Nov 2017 #4
Well alright then - no problem! hatrack Nov 2017 #5
What we found out working with Transcanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons CousinIT Nov 2017 #6
OK then, a cube 43.1 feet on a side. FarCenter Nov 2017 #8
Alright then. That's just A-OK! It's near drinking water but who cares? CousinIT Nov 2017 #11
This is a big story. rockfordfile Nov 2017 #7
K&R 2naSalit Nov 2017 #9
Those who voted couldn't consider safety? Why not? Ilsa Nov 2017 #10
I guess they figure it will be safe-it's been pre-disastered! Dread Pirate Roberts Nov 2017 #12

CousinIT

(9,252 posts)
6. What we found out working with Transcanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 02:45 PM
Nov 2017
Keystone pipeline oil spill could be worse than we thought

. . .

Worries of water contamination

A viscous type of oil called diluted bitumen, or tar sands oil, flows through the Keystone Pipeline. Because it’s so thick, leaks can be difficult to detect. If the oil does spill, it’s often far more detrimental to sensitive water resources. Bitumen is also one of the dirtiest fuels in the world. Unlike conventional crude which can be pumped directly from the ground, water is required to separate the heavy, tar-like substance from the sand it’s found in — a process that depletes and pollutes freshwater resources.

Thursday’s spill happened on a section of pipe along a small road approximately 35 miles south of the Ludden pump station in Marshall County, South Dakota, three miles southeast of the town of Amherst. In a statement, TransCanada said the oil “was completely isolated within 15 minutes and emergency response procedures were activated.” The company did not respond to a request for further comment.

Kent Moeckly, a nearby land owner and member of the Dakota Rural Action Group, told VICE News he’s concerned that the spill could be much larger though, in large part because the computers used to detect oil pressure drops don’t always detect small leaks. “TransCanada thought it was 200,000 gallons. What we found out working with TransCanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons,” Moeckly said.

His concerns aren’t unfounded. After the last major Keystone oil spill in South Dakota, in April 2016, TransCanada revised its initial estimate of the spill from 187 gallons to 16,800 gallons after the company started digging up the field where the spill occurred. Because diluted bitumen is so dense, it seeps into the soil and river beds rather than rising like conventional, lighter crude, potentially masking the full spill.

In 2010, when over 800,000 gallons of tar-sands oil spilled into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan, the cleanup took nearly three years and cost the company in charge, Enbridge, over $1 billion, making it one of the most expensive clean-ups in history. Enbridge also had to pay over $60 million in civil penalties for violating of the Clean Water Act, which the Trump administration wants to dismantle. That could make spills less costly for oil companies like TransCanada but more expensive for landowners and communities.

Another concern for Moeckly is the proximity of the spill to the Crow Creek drainage ditch, a small tributary to a major water supply for South Dakota, which flows just a few dozen feet from where the spill happened. “What this ditch does is that it takes the snowmelt to the east and escorts it to the James River about 40 miles east of here,” Kent said.


https://news.vice.com/story/keystone-pipeline-oil-spill-could-be-worse-than-we-thought

CousinIT

(9,252 posts)
11. Alright then. That's just A-OK! It's near drinking water but who cares?
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 04:22 PM
Nov 2017

It's just a tiny, iny, itty-bitty spill. No big deal.

WHATEVER are all these snowflakes getting so upset about?

It's just SILLY to worry about spillage of the dirtiest fossil fuel substance known to man.

What EVER was I thinking?


Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
10. Those who voted couldn't consider safety? Why not?
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 03:24 PM
Nov 2017

And who would stop them from considering safety and the integrity of their drinking water?

Dread Pirate Roberts

(1,896 posts)
12. I guess they figure it will be safe-it's been pre-disastered!
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 04:32 PM
Nov 2017

What are the odds of anything like this happening again?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jesus Christ. Days after ...