Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJesus Christ. Days after leaking over 210,000++ gallons of oil, Nebraska approved the Keystone XL
Those who voted were not legally allowed to take safety or the effect future leaks would have on the health of the community into consideration.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 597 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jesus Christ. Days after leaking over 210,000++ gallons of oil, Nebraska approved the Keystone XL (Original Post)
CousinIT
Nov 2017
OP
What we found out working with Transcanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons
CousinIT
Nov 2017
#6
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)1. Nebraska, goddam
Looks like we're due for a re-write of the old Nina Simone classic.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,381 posts)2. Six railcars.
Vinca
(50,299 posts)3. Guess they don't like drinking water.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)4. 210000 gallons is a cube 30.4 feet on a side.
It's not a very big spill.
hatrack
(59,591 posts)5. Well alright then - no problem!
.
CousinIT
(9,252 posts)6. What we found out working with Transcanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons
Keystone pipeline oil spill could be worse than we thought
https://news.vice.com/story/keystone-pipeline-oil-spill-could-be-worse-than-we-thought
. . .
Worries of water contamination
A viscous type of oil called diluted bitumen, or tar sands oil, flows through the Keystone Pipeline. Because its so thick, leaks can be difficult to detect. If the oil does spill, its often far more detrimental to sensitive water resources. Bitumen is also one of the dirtiest fuels in the world. Unlike conventional crude which can be pumped directly from the ground, water is required to separate the heavy, tar-like substance from the sand its found in a process that depletes and pollutes freshwater resources.
Thursdays spill happened on a section of pipe along a small road approximately 35 miles south of the Ludden pump station in Marshall County, South Dakota, three miles southeast of the town of Amherst. In a statement, TransCanada said the oil was completely isolated within 15 minutes and emergency response procedures were activated. The company did not respond to a request for further comment.
Kent Moeckly, a nearby land owner and member of the Dakota Rural Action Group, told VICE News hes concerned that the spill could be much larger though, in large part because the computers used to detect oil pressure drops dont always detect small leaks. TransCanada thought it was 200,000 gallons. What we found out working with TransCanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons, Moeckly said.
His concerns arent unfounded. After the last major Keystone oil spill in South Dakota, in April 2016, TransCanada revised its initial estimate of the spill from 187 gallons to 16,800 gallons after the company started digging up the field where the spill occurred. Because diluted bitumen is so dense, it seeps into the soil and river beds rather than rising like conventional, lighter crude, potentially masking the full spill.
In 2010, when over 800,000 gallons of tar-sands oil spilled into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan, the cleanup took nearly three years and cost the company in charge, Enbridge, over $1 billion, making it one of the most expensive clean-ups in history. Enbridge also had to pay over $60 million in civil penalties for violating of the Clean Water Act, which the Trump administration wants to dismantle. That could make spills less costly for oil companies like TransCanada but more expensive for landowners and communities.
Another concern for Moeckly is the proximity of the spill to the Crow Creek drainage ditch, a small tributary to a major water supply for South Dakota, which flows just a few dozen feet from where the spill happened. What this ditch does is that it takes the snowmelt to the east and escorts it to the James River about 40 miles east of here, Kent said.
Worries of water contamination
A viscous type of oil called diluted bitumen, or tar sands oil, flows through the Keystone Pipeline. Because its so thick, leaks can be difficult to detect. If the oil does spill, its often far more detrimental to sensitive water resources. Bitumen is also one of the dirtiest fuels in the world. Unlike conventional crude which can be pumped directly from the ground, water is required to separate the heavy, tar-like substance from the sand its found in a process that depletes and pollutes freshwater resources.
Thursdays spill happened on a section of pipe along a small road approximately 35 miles south of the Ludden pump station in Marshall County, South Dakota, three miles southeast of the town of Amherst. In a statement, TransCanada said the oil was completely isolated within 15 minutes and emergency response procedures were activated. The company did not respond to a request for further comment.
Kent Moeckly, a nearby land owner and member of the Dakota Rural Action Group, told VICE News hes concerned that the spill could be much larger though, in large part because the computers used to detect oil pressure drops dont always detect small leaks. TransCanada thought it was 200,000 gallons. What we found out working with TransCanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons, Moeckly said.
His concerns arent unfounded. After the last major Keystone oil spill in South Dakota, in April 2016, TransCanada revised its initial estimate of the spill from 187 gallons to 16,800 gallons after the company started digging up the field where the spill occurred. Because diluted bitumen is so dense, it seeps into the soil and river beds rather than rising like conventional, lighter crude, potentially masking the full spill.
In 2010, when over 800,000 gallons of tar-sands oil spilled into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan, the cleanup took nearly three years and cost the company in charge, Enbridge, over $1 billion, making it one of the most expensive clean-ups in history. Enbridge also had to pay over $60 million in civil penalties for violating of the Clean Water Act, which the Trump administration wants to dismantle. That could make spills less costly for oil companies like TransCanada but more expensive for landowners and communities.
Another concern for Moeckly is the proximity of the spill to the Crow Creek drainage ditch, a small tributary to a major water supply for South Dakota, which flows just a few dozen feet from where the spill happened. What this ditch does is that it takes the snowmelt to the east and escorts it to the James River about 40 miles east of here, Kent said.
https://news.vice.com/story/keystone-pipeline-oil-spill-could-be-worse-than-we-thought
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)8. OK then, a cube 43.1 feet on a side.
CousinIT
(9,252 posts)11. Alright then. That's just A-OK! It's near drinking water but who cares?
It's just a tiny, iny, itty-bitty spill. No big deal.
WHATEVER are all these snowflakes getting so upset about?
It's just SILLY to worry about spillage of the dirtiest fossil fuel substance known to man.
What EVER was I thinking?
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)7. This is a big story.
2naSalit
(86,713 posts)9. K&R
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)10. Those who voted couldn't consider safety? Why not?
And who would stop them from considering safety and the integrity of their drinking water?
Dread Pirate Roberts
(1,896 posts)12. I guess they figure it will be safe-it's been pre-disastered!
What are the odds of anything like this happening again?