Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Conyers Responds (Original Post) bigtree Nov 2017 OP
Something really hit home when I was reading an article on Rose. Pacifist Patriot Nov 2017 #1
Yup - definitely a public figure can have "one-offs" that are extenuating circumstances. Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2017 #7
And Bill Cosby n/t TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #15
Conyers paid out $27K of our money to settle a harrassment claim BeyondGeography Nov 2017 #2
he didn't invent the House arbitration system bigtree Nov 2017 #3
Then he shouldn't have denied the settlement, I guess BeyondGeography Nov 2017 #6
before you start into me about 'defending' something or the other bigtree Nov 2017 #8
Buzzfeed sought and received independent verification BeyondGeography Nov 2017 #9
Conyer's side of the story deserves to be heard bigtree Nov 2017 #11
The "process" sucks, that should be clear to anyone who understands how power perpetuates injustice BeyondGeography Nov 2017 #13
we'll see what Congress devises to resolve this bigtree Nov 2017 #17
The thing is the proccess mercuryblues Nov 2017 #16
the process is a mess bigtree Nov 2017 #19
I don't see where he denied the settlement. Pacifist Patriot Nov 2017 #18
He did pay the $27K and it was an amount he said was comparable to severance pay -- that's different pnwmom Nov 2017 #10
as far as I know he didn't pay anything bigtree Nov 2017 #12
Not long after a denial. pintobean Nov 2017 #4
well, he said 'his office' made the arrangements bigtree Nov 2017 #14
Huge difference between Conyers, Franken, and Moore: Initech Nov 2017 #5

Pacifist Patriot

(24,653 posts)
1. Something really hit home when I was reading an article on Rose.
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 02:53 PM
Nov 2017

"Rumors about Rose’s behavior have circulated for years." Where have we heard that before?

This is also the case with the Weinstein, Moore, and Trump allegations, as well as others we're learning more about. With time, we begin to hear their behavior was a poorly kept secret. I think this is an important aspect to consider.

Time will tell, but I have my doubts we'll subsequently learn that Conyers and Franken have long been known to be sexually inappropriate.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
7. Yup - definitely a public figure can have "one-offs" that are extenuating circumstances.
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:18 PM
Nov 2017

That Charlie Rose was a shocker to me anyway. He always struck me as calm, dignified, and intellectual.

I agree with you on Conyers - but against all public opinion here - wouldn't bet a dime that more doesn't come out about Franken. sorry to say. Just my intuition. Course that wasn't right about Rose

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
3. he didn't invent the House arbitration system
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:13 PM
Nov 2017

...Rep. Conyers didn't pay anything at all.

He's denied the claims and isn't admitting guilt by agreeing to the settlement. He ('his office') agreed the claimant should receive severance pay and the claimant agreed to drop the complaint.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
6. Then he shouldn't have denied the settlement, I guess
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:17 PM
Nov 2017

Since it was all mechanical, technical, nothing to see here.

Here's what you are defending:

The draft agreement viewed by BuzzFeed News was unsigned, but congressional employment records match the timing and amounts outlined in the document. The woman left the office and never went public with her story.

The process was “disgusting,” said Matthew Peterson, who worked as a law clerk representing the complainant, and who listed as a signatory to some of the documents.

“It is a designed cover-up,” said Peterson, who declined to discuss details of the case but agreed to characterize it in general terms. “You feel like they were betrayed by their government just for coming forward. It’s like being abused twice.”

https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/she-complained-that-a-powerful-congressman-harassed-her?utm_term=.urj41DA35#.hbA4Qld1x


We should be done with defending these fools. I know I am.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
8. before you start into me about 'defending' something or the other
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:34 PM
Nov 2017

...you should recognize that I'm just trying to represent the facts, without bias.

I understand that you've already made a negative judgement about Conyers, much of your info coming from Buzzfeed and the right-wing hack who brought all of this forward.

Right now, what we have are charges which have been strongly denied by Rep. Conyers, who has invited further investigation of the charges and the settlement. He deserves, at least, the benefit of the 'due process' that he's asked for. The complainant(s) deserves a hearing, in light of the revelation of the settlement,' if there's a desire or need to be heard further.

In the face of the salacious reporting, I think Rep. Conyers' denials should be given as much weight as the accusations, at least at this point.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
9. Buzzfeed sought and received independent verification
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:38 PM
Nov 2017

on all the affidavits, including from the accuser, so please don't hide behind Cernovich. I'll go with the independent information right now over Conyers, who has already stepped in it by issuing a blanket denial that had to be retracted two hours later.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
11. Conyer's side of the story deserves to be heard
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:51 PM
Nov 2017

...if anyone is 'hiding behind Cernovich' it's those who are damning the congressman based on a process which didn't resolve the question of culpability.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
13. The "process" sucks, that should be clear to anyone who understands how power perpetuates injustice
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:57 PM
Nov 2017

It is designed to protect entrenched and entitled people and, because it is secretive, does nothing to alert employees what they are getting into when they decided to work for someone who is a serial harasser.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
17. we'll see what Congress devises to resolve this
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 04:05 PM
Nov 2017

...I wonder if the claimant is agreeable to reopening the complaint?

I see that the congressman is willing to make himself accountable to whatever they decide to go forward with.

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
16. The thing is the proccess
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 04:05 PM
Nov 2017

the claimant has to go through, in and of itself, is designed to keep the claimant do drop it. If that fails to keep it quiet and under seal. It is set up to protect the culprit from the get-go. Conyers might not have even known about the proceedings. If any 1 of these deadlines are not met, even by 1 minute it is dropped entirely. It is designed to wear down the claimant and protect the politician.

This is the elaborate system Congress created to protect sexual predators on Capitol Hill

The 180-day statute of limitations to request “counseling”

The 30-day “counseling” period

The 15-day statute of limitations to request mediation

The 30-day mediation period

The taxpayer-funded sexual harassment settlement

The 30-day waiting period and 60-day statute of limitations for filing a complaint

The secret administrative hearing

A federal case against a congressional office, not the person engaging in sexual harassment

https://thinkprogress.org/sexual-predator-congress-0802dc2ef524/

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
19. the process is a mess
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 04:17 PM
Nov 2017

...and an insult on top of any abuse suffered. It should be exploded and replaced.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
10. He did pay the $27K and it was an amount he said was comparable to severance pay -- that's different
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:46 PM
Nov 2017

from being actual severance pay.

And his credibility is weakened by the fact that at first he denied knowing anything about the claims at all.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
12. as far as I know he didn't pay anything
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:54 PM
Nov 2017

...taxpayers did.

It's not at all comparable to other settlements which come out of court cases, for instance. There's no resolution of culpability in the settlement, so pointing to it as a cause for resignation makes no sense. That was my point.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
14. well, he said 'his office' made the arrangements
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:58 PM
Nov 2017

...so we haven't yet seen evidence that he personally engaged in the process.

I'm a little skeptical of the AP tweet.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
5. Huge difference between Conyers, Franken, and Moore:
Tue Nov 21, 2017, 03:16 PM
Nov 2017

Conyers and Franken have both stated that they will fully cooperate with an investigation.

Roy Moore is going on a meltdown and accusing everyone and everything of conspiring to commit a witch hunt against him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Conyers Responds