Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:35 AM Nov 2017

GOP strategist Steve Schmidt: Trumps defense of Roy Moore exposes a profound moral rot...


GOP strategist Steve Schmidt: Trump’s defense of Roy Moore ‘exposes a profound moral rot in the Republican Party’
Noor Al-Sibai
21 Nov 2017 at 20:49 ET


President Donald Trump’s public denial of accusations of sexual misconduct levied against Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore represent a turning point for the party, one GOP strategist said Tuesday evening.

“Tragic day for the Republican Party,” Republican strategist Steve Schmidt told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes.

“The line is drawn, the die are cast, the forces of decency are against the forces of indecency,” he continued. “This exposes a profound moral rot in the country, in the Republican Party. A great test for the citizens of state of Alabama.”

“We’ve reached the hour that George Washington warned us about,” the Republican said. “A political tribalism that’s so corrosive, so corrupting, that it could take otherwise normal, decent people that you’d encounter on any day, and make them defend the indefensible and the profoundly indecent. And it’s a sad moment.”

Watch Schmidt eulogize his party below, via MSNBC.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/gop-strategist-steve-schmidt-trumps-defense-of-roy-moore-exposes-a-profound-moral-rot-in-the-republican-party/
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP strategist Steve Schmidt: Trumps defense of Roy Moore exposes a profound moral rot... (Original Post) babylonsister Nov 2017 OP
Last night I heard a commentator refer to it as the "Grand Old Pedophiles." Vinca Nov 2017 #1
I prefer 'Ghoulish Old Perverts'............ LongTomH Nov 2017 #14
Greedy Old Perverts lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #17
Here's there baseball cap: L. Coyote Nov 2017 #24
A great read titaniumsalute Nov 2017 #2
You Own This Stevie Boy! ProfessorGAC Nov 2017 #3
While you are correct in what you say, he has led the fight against Trump. I would OnDoutside Nov 2017 #12
I have done a lot of thinking... dajoki Nov 2017 #19
I'll stick up for Goldwater Pope George Ringo II Nov 2017 #26
Yep - that shift in the parties was the beginning of the end Cosmocat Nov 2017 #33
Also, as long as we're talking about changes from '64 Pope George Ringo II Nov 2017 #41
Yes I agree with 1964 as the start, but I think they upped the OnDoutside Nov 2017 #34
The Master And His Minions - 1985 Marcuse Nov 2017 #21
Where's Chuckie Todd? ProfessorGAC Nov 2017 #22
Chuck Todd was 13 years old in 1985 emulatorloo Nov 2017 #36
I Know ProfessorGAC Nov 2017 #40
I agree totally. Save your outrage Schmidt, you helped make this mess. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #27
I believe in redemption and atonement nt emulatorloo Nov 2017 #37
really? Republicans haven't cared about that in decades so no biggie beachbum bob Nov 2017 #4
Just figure this out, Steve? sarge43 Nov 2017 #5
He's been saying similar for a long while now. emulatorloo Nov 2017 #38
I give him credit for calling Moore a pedophile and Pence a titanic fraud and nonstop liar dalton99a Nov 2017 #6
A relevant quote from Washington's Farewell Address: Girard442 Nov 2017 #7
Well done. Your emphasis is perfectly placed. brush Nov 2017 #9
Thanks. Very current and ominous. KY_EnviroGuy Nov 2017 #10
Holy moly Washington must've had a crystal ball. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #18
Everytime I read something from our founding fathers JDC Nov 2017 #29
k and r Achilleaze Nov 2017 #8
It exposes a profound moral rot all right. ananda Nov 2017 #11
Steve Schmidt brought moral rot to the Republican party in the era of Rove/Cheney/Bush oberliner Nov 2017 #13
Steve has done a lot of damage SHRED Nov 2017 #20
The question I would have for Steve is, if Jeb Bush had won instead OnDoutside Nov 2017 #15
"otherwise normal, decent people" hibbing Nov 2017 #16
I thought Eisenhower died. L. Coyote Nov 2017 #25
STEVE WHY ARE YOU SO SURPRISED???? infullview Nov 2017 #23
He's been saying stuff like this for at least a year. It's not a surprise to him. emulatorloo Nov 2017 #39
Is "expose" the right word? Or "makes it impossible to ignore"?... JHB Nov 2017 #28
I'm glad schmidt has always been critical of trump and continues to be JI7 Nov 2017 #30
I have no idea exactly why Schmidt turned against his own party. Grammy23 Nov 2017 #31
Every time I see Schmidt, I think of his role in poisoning our nation w Sarah Palin. Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2017 #42
No, Steve. That rot has been hiding in plain sight for decades. GoCubsGo Nov 2017 #32
K&R... spanone Nov 2017 #35
Was it moral rot to try and turn Sarah Palin into a vice president, Steve? Volaris Nov 2017 #43

Vinca

(50,276 posts)
1. Last night I heard a commentator refer to it as the "Grand Old Pedophiles."
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:37 AM
Nov 2017

You'd think the semi-sane of the bunch would want to avoid that particular tag, but they're more like a brainwashed cult.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
14. I prefer 'Ghoulish Old Perverts'............
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:49 AM
Nov 2017

.........and there aren't that many 'semi-sane' members of the party left!!!!

ProfessorGAC

(65,061 posts)
3. You Own This Stevie Boy!
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:50 AM
Nov 2017

Ever heard of Atwater? Ever heard of Rove?

You(!) own this, Mr. Strategist. Now that it's blown up in your face, you want to criticize? No! Way too late for that Stevie.

OnDoutside

(19,960 posts)
12. While you are correct in what you say, he has led the fight against Trump. I would
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:43 AM
Nov 2017

love to see someone on MSNBC put your points to him, not in a nasty way but curious as to how he views all that now ? And specifically does he accept that this has been coming since the time of hatred towards bill Clinton, for beating Bush at least, if not back to 1964 ?

dajoki

(10,678 posts)
19. I have done a lot of thinking...
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:05 AM
Nov 2017

about where the republic party is now and I also trace it back to 1964, barry goldwater.

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
26. I'll stick up for Goldwater
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:47 AM
Nov 2017

I think his positions look worse and worse with every passing year, but I can respect the intellectual honesty of his views and I don't really look at him as malicious and evil for its own sake. I'd feel better pointing the finger of blame at the "Southern Strategy" and "Moral Majority" pandering as where things really started to go wrong for them, which really brings us to Nixon and then Reagan.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
33. Yep - that shift in the parties was the beginning of the end
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:15 PM
Nov 2017

let's be honest.

Until Johnson got his run of civil rights legislation passed, the Democratic Party was a comfy home to southern white folks.

That left them vulnerable and Nixon was more than happy to poach them into the GOP.

The consolidation of racism/bigotry/homophobia, "moral" authoritarianism and business interests got us the monster we have today with 45 and an endless number of deranged repubican's in congress, state houses and local government.

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
41. Also, as long as we're talking about changes from '64
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 04:33 PM
Nov 2017

The frank truth is that in '64 you could very nearly have run Stalin against George Washington and the only important question would have been which one of them had the (D) after his name and JFK's ghost on his side. In much the same way that Bush was on the 2008 GOP ticket in a negative way, the sheer emotional "JFK would want it" element is hard to undervalue as a positive for Johnson. A part of the reason Goldwater got clobbered so spectacularly is due to that fluke of running against a popular President's ghost, rather than anything genuinely systemic in the parties or inherent in the actual candidates. The GOP ignored that unique situation and after their analysis decided a complete re-invention of its brand was in order after that slaughter, and the result worked...for a while...before becoming progressively more disgusting until it became completely unacceptable to any reasonable person.

OnDoutside

(19,960 posts)
34. Yes I agree with 1964 as the start, but I think they upped the
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:16 PM
Nov 2017

Wackiness during their attempts to impeach Clinton .... It drove them round the bend that he kept getting the better of them, and then onto Hillary, where they threw out any last vestige of honor and decency out the window. They have so many rwnjs dominating the GOP, I don't see how it can he saved in its current form.

ProfessorGAC

(65,061 posts)
40. I Know
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 03:08 PM
Nov 2017

But, he started as an Atwater acolyte. But somehow there is amnesia in the rest of the media about that.

dalton99a

(81,515 posts)
6. I give him credit for calling Moore a pedophile and Pence a titanic fraud and nonstop liar
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:32 AM
Nov 2017

But yeah, words are cheap

Girard442

(6,075 posts)
7. A relevant quote from Washington's Farewell Address:
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:47 AM
Nov 2017
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.


Emphasis added by me.

Read full document at:

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=15&page=transcript

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,492 posts)
10. Thanks. Very current and ominous.
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:26 AM
Nov 2017

One appropriate phrase for us that caught my eye: "sharpened by the spirit of revenge".


JDC

(10,129 posts)
29. Everytime I read something from our founding fathers
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:54 AM
Nov 2017

I am amazed at their unbelievably thoughtful insight, eloquence, and clarity of thought.

We now have a pResident that can’t put a sentence together.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
13. Steve Schmidt brought moral rot to the Republican party in the era of Rove/Cheney/Bush
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:46 AM
Nov 2017

It is bizarre that people on our side are holding him up as some sort of moral voice of clarity.

He is the man who pushed for Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court.

He is part of the Rove/Cheney/Bush horror show.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
20. Steve has done a lot of damage
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:12 AM
Nov 2017

You are correct.
His words now, while appreciated, ring pretty hollow at this point considering what he's done.

OnDoutside

(19,960 posts)
15. The question I would have for Steve is, if Jeb Bush had won instead
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:49 AM
Nov 2017

Of Trump, and the Republicans still tried to bring in the Repeal of the ACA and the tax gift to the rich, what would you say then ?

hibbing

(10,098 posts)
16. "otherwise normal, decent people"
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:50 AM
Nov 2017

Last edited Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:24 AM - Edit history (1)

Who are these otherwise normal, decent people in the leadership of that god awful party? The only tragic day for the Republican party will be when they don't control all three branches of the federal government, the majority of governorships and state legislatures.

Peace

infullview

(981 posts)
23. STEVE WHY ARE YOU SO SURPRISED????
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:28 AM
Nov 2017

The RNC and tRump collude with Russia to steal an election and your surprised when they support a pedophile to maintain power!!??

The republican party is so f*cking low at this point they have to pull their socks down to see daylight.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
28. Is "expose" the right word? Or "makes it impossible to ignore"?...
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:51 AM
Nov 2017

...as least for Steve.

The rot was there long ago, and the Republicans actively fostered it because it provided their margin of victory.

JI7

(89,251 posts)
30. I'm glad schmidt has always been critical of trump and continues to be
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:00 PM
Nov 2017

He isn't claiming to be a liberal but can agree to the vileness of trump and speaks out against it.

Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
31. I have no idea exactly why Schmidt turned against his own party.
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:12 PM
Nov 2017

Maybe it was a “come to Jesus” moment when he realized that a moral degenerate like tRump was going to be the Republican nominee last year. Maybe it was after tRump’s nomination and he saw otherwise decent people flocking to his rallies and declaring their allegiance to such a despicable man/child. But something in him recognized we were headed for a cliff in terms of morality. He looked into that abyss and recoiled in terror.

I recall very well Schmidt’s role in the 2008 debacle with McCain/Palin. And I think Schmidt probably got a morality wake up call with the mental gymnastics he had to deal with as Palin revealed her thinking or maybe it was the LACK of it that started his turn. Dealing with that ticket up close and personal probably gave him insight that we will never know about.

Whatever the reason or reasons, I will take his words today at face value. He is putting the moral dilemma out on the table and maybe forcing a few dyed in the wool Republicans to confront their own moral values. All the conflicts that tRump brought with him are today being revisited in Alabama. The people of Alabama had a chance to reject tRump in 2016 and didn’t. Maybe Schmidt’s goal is to try to stop the degradation of our country by taking a hard look at what the election of tRump brought and saying forcefully that we can pull back. We can determine that we have gone far enough and we don’t like where we are headed.

I am willing to give the man a moment of redemption. He, at least, is willing to confront his party and painfully try to lance the boil growing from within its body. I hope he is successful in causing enough people to take a cold, hard look at what they have become and to be willing to say enough. No MOORE!

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
42. Every time I see Schmidt, I think of his role in poisoning our nation w Sarah Palin.
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 02:57 AM
Nov 2017

She is pretty much the female Trump, as far as I'm concerned. I'm glad Schmidt is speaking out against the Rs now, but I'm not sure it's sufficient penance.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
32. No, Steve. That rot has been hiding in plain sight for decades.
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:50 PM
Nov 2017

Eventually, it was going to get so bad that one can't help but notice it, including those who willfully ignored it, such as yourself. Actually, Mr. Schmidt, you are a bit of the mold that helped cause that rot. I'm glad you are finally seeing the light, but I hope you'll eventually realize that you were part of the problem. Granted, not nearly as bad as many others in your party.

Volaris

(10,272 posts)
43. Was it moral rot to try and turn Sarah Palin into a vice president, Steve?
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 04:07 AM
Nov 2017

Because if you're willing to OWN that as part of the problem as t exists today, then fine, I'll forgive you.

Otherwise, you've found a very good way to pad your own nest (by screeching about how bad things are, without even acknowledging your role in making them this bad).

And if it's the latter, you can fuck right off and go die.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP strategist Steve Schm...