Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:27 AM Nov 2017

Trump's judicial picks: 'The goal is to end the progressive state'


Jamiles Lartey in New York

Wednesday 22 November 2017 07.14 EST Last modified on Wednesday 22 November 2017 07.15 EST
Donald Trump has sustained more than his fair share of political losses during the first 10 months of his presidency, mostly at the hands of the federal courts.

It was the federal courts that struck down his “Muslim travel ban” on three separate occasions, that blocked his ban on trans people in the military and that did the same to his attempt to defund so-called sanctuary cities.

But the makeup of America’s judges is quietly becoming the site of one of Trump’s most unequivocal successes: nominating and installing judges who reflect his own worldview at a speed and volume unseen in recent memory. Trump could conceivably have handpicked more than 30% of the nation’s federal judges before the end of his first term, his advisers have suggested, and independent observers agree.


“The president himself has said that he expects this to be one of his major legacies. He is going to reshape the bench for generations to come,” said Douglas Keith, counsel with the fair courts arm of the Brennan Center for Justice.

more
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/22/federal-court-judicial-nominations-donald-trump
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
1. Yes, of course. It's also to end government of, by and for
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:33 AM
Nov 2017

the people as we know it. We are incompetent, you see, and of course the eager fascists/kleptocrats behind this have an excellent point. What they can't see it that they are far more incompetent. They do know they are inimical to our interests, but they see that as good.

If I had to sum up the immediate future of democratic politics in a single word I should say “insurance.” That is the future—insurance against dangers from abroad, insurance against dangers scarcely less grave and much more near and constant which threaten us here at home in our own island. -- Winston Churchill

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. Our constitutional democracy provides all the needed weapons,
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:43 AM
Nov 2017

if, as Benjamin Franklin famously said, we can keep it.

If those fail and it comes to violence, we will lose. Not only have "they" severely and entirely intentionally divided us, all they have to do is turn the utilities off in any troublesome area. Any strategically chosen combination of water, power, food supply, communications withdrawn, and within two days those people would be far more concerned with survival and worry about their loved ones than what form our government has taken.

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
16. That would be true
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 01:13 PM
Nov 2017

But the Retrumplicans are hell-bent on destroying the "weapons" of our constitutional democracy.

Democracy only survives with the "consent of the governed". In two of the last three presidencies, the will (consent) of the governed has been circumvented.

And don't even bother to look at how Congressional Districts have been skewed to favor the few.

Democracy can't survive this

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
17. It's too soon to say that. GOTV.
Fri Nov 24, 2017, 08:13 AM
Nov 2017

40% of the electorate didn't vote in 2016, including large numbers of young voters, and 2018 will also be about turnout.

And NO trying to "woo" those famous rotten white working class men who chose what's become a poisonous white supremacy kiss-up/kick-down party. They rejected what they officially claimed to want when they left us to vote for resentment and clinging to special privileges. Some will come back on their own and join the 1/3 of their fellows who would never have done what they did, the rest need to be replaced with people who believe in what we represent.

We need the choices to be very clear.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
3. Unfortunately getting rid of Trump won't change things
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:14 AM
Nov 2017

Pence will appoint the same scumbags. Only getting 51 Democrats, or more, in the Senate will stop this madness.

CousinIT

(9,247 posts)
5. Our best (only) chance now is to pack the Senate & House with DEMOCRATS in 2018
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:19 AM
Nov 2017

That would effectively neuter the little orange shitbag until we can get his ass OUT of our house. Maybe he'd pitch a hissy fit and resign. Or, maybe he'd be IMPEACHED as he ought to be.

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
8. Better would be a "wave" large enough to give the Dems 2/3rd's in the Senate
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:42 AM
Nov 2017

Then we can remove every last one of these piece of shit "judges"...and I guarantee the fucking people will be with them to do it.

That's the neat thing about impeachment. You don't even need a God Damn reason, just enough votes to say "you're out"!

onenote

(42,714 posts)
12. In what universe do the Democrats get 67 Senators in 2018?
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:36 PM
Nov 2017

There currently are 46 Democratic senators and 2 independents that caucus with the Democrats. Of those the seats held by 23 Democrats and the two independents are up for grabs in 2018, along with eight Republican held seats. Let's imagine a fantasy world in which the Democrats/Independent seats all stay in the Democratic column and ALL eight Republican seats change hands -- that gives the Democrats 56 Senate seats -- well short of 2/3.

And even if the Democrats were to reach the 2/3 majority in a future year, there is not a chance in the world that they engage in a purge of Trump-appointed judges.

Baitball Blogger

(46,733 posts)
6. As our country gets more progressive, we might actually demand more judicial
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:20 AM
Nov 2017

oversight with judges who step over the line.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
11. Folks donate to the DNC...if we take back the Senate and that will cost money, we can stop this cold
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:59 AM
Nov 2017

JHB

(37,160 posts)
14. Time to bone up on grounds for impeaching federal judges, and backbone up to do it...
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:52 PM
Nov 2017

...whenever they give grounds. And they will. With this bunch, you can count on it.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
15. The goal is to neuter government for the short-term benefit of the plutocrats.
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 03:23 PM
Nov 2017

We may never get back that control.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's judicial picks: '...