Lock her up!

Happy Thanksgiving!

politicians publicly endorse other politicians all the time.

The COMEY latter makes sense because that was Comey using his position as FBI director to publish a bullshit letter to sway public opinion. But on the other hand if he said "i am endorsing Trump" that is okay isn't it?

I guess i don't understand where the hatch act ends and the 1st amendment begins....

if she quit and went to work for Trump 2020, then fine.

You can not address mailers during business hours, while you are on the government clock.

She was campaigning, in her official capacity, while doing government work. She was on the clock, campaigning on our dime.

Firing level offense.

so.... during your free time......... it is okay.... but when you are working on government time (like repping the White House on TV) you are not allowed to promote candidates?

Conway will be on record, and there may come a time it will haunt her. It is so much better than letting the Trump clan act without any public notice. It's worth it, every.single.time

Nope, will never agree to that type of inactivity.

An observation that nothing will come from an ethics violation, based on the outcome of the last one filed for nearly identicial activity, says nothing at all about whether one should be filed.

Otherwise you would have accepted my last two posts that something is better than nothing. instead you constantly Interject with the negative futilistic negativism. It's all pretty transparent. You had more that one opportunity in this sub thread to state that the complaint should have been filed......and yet the go to fall on our swords is your go to.

The thought that the complaint should not have been filed literally never crossed my mind.

In fact I filed (at least) two ethics complaints with the OGE against Conway in response to similar behavior in the past, before they changed the website to make it impossible to easily file a complaint. I posted something here about the first complaint I filed, as well as about the change in the website after the second.

But since your post suggests you pay attention to what I post, you probably know that.

And you lived up to the warning......you lost this argument some time ago. You are a waste of time

and acknowleding what you said about how I constantly respond an example of me being insulting?

I've been responding pretty calmly and without a lot of emotion to:

1. Your inaccurate assumption about what I was thinking when I made my initial post
2. Your doubling down when I explained that wasn't what I was thinking
3. Your insistence that to have any credibility I needed to have responded the way you might have responded
4. And finally calling me a waste of time, and twice implying that you are stalking me (first commenting on how I always respond when - to my knowledge - I've never interacted with you before and now suggesting you are talking to other people about how I respond).

I'm not particularly fond of people imputing motives to me that I don't have - or make allegations that are generally untrue about how I have interacted with you - yet all I have done is to correct your assumption about my motives and inquire in a joking manner about why you are so cranky.

I haven't lobbed a single insult at you, despite your allegations to the contrary.

...still at it I see. Yes, it's all insulting. And to top it off your attempt at turning this sub thread around to make yourself seem like a victim. It would be pretty laughable if it weren't so sad.

The only thing I have to say about that and what it says about some participants of this site is;

closed for the next three years or until further notice. By order of the Prezident of the once great United States

it be refiled after we get control ?

She obviously doesn't know, doesn't care, or doesn't want to follow the rules, I mean LAW.