General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate GOP tax plan hits deficit snag, leaving leaders scrambling
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/2017/11/30/c2118302-d5e7-11e7-a986-d0a9770d9a3e_story.html?utm_term=.7d2fba3cbdfdSenate leadership, who had hoped to vote to pass the $1.5 trillion tax bill by late Thursday night, instead sent lawmakers home and began to search for a new way to offset the cost of the legislation. They are looking to win the support of several senators, including Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who has led a small group of colleagues in demanding that the bill not drive up the nations debt.
The new tension threatens to undercut what had been an unusual degree of unity within the GOP, with even Sen. John McCain, the Arizona Republican who has repeatedly defied his party, announcing support for the bill Thursday.
Republicans are scrambling for a path forward as the result of two successive setbacks suffered Thursday as they moved toward a vote. First, the Joint Committee on Taxation, Congresss nonpartisan scorekeeper, reported that the tax bill would not generate nearly as much economic growth over the next 10 years as Republicans had expected. As a result, the nations deficit would be $1 trillion higher.
Then, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a Corker-backed proposal to automatically raise taxes in the future if Republican expectations of higher growth did not materialize was not consistent with Senate rules.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This thing may implode yet.
TEB
(12,897 posts)BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,997 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)so what's left to offset the deficit except the tax breaks and cuts for the very, very wealthy and corporations?
This is the conundrum for the Rs. All they have to do is make the corporate/rich tax cuts a few percentage points less and problem solved! Except they can't because the donor class won't allow it.
As Josh Marshall points out, no one knows what's really in the bill or how whatever ends up in it will play out, but once the GOP passes it, we will have all of 2018 to find out and analyze it. This bill is apparently so bad, even heavily gerrymandered "safe" GOP seats in Pennsylvania might not be.
Cosmocat
(14,574 posts)They are THAT craven and desperate, they will cut funding on child cancer treatment if needed ...
mdbl
(4,976 posts)Repugs are stealing from our country's economic well-being. They think they are entitled to obscene wealth and everyone else is entitled to a life of poverty under their rule. It shows in most of them that voted for a bill which was written as irresponsibly as someone who runs up a credit card bill knowing they can't pay for it.
ProfessorGAC
(65,199 posts)Corker wants to not drive up the debt. Simple solution, Bobby. Vote no!
The idea that cutting revenue will not increase deficits is a fairy tale, and so is any thought of long term economic growth stimulation.
Supply side is nonsense, because all capitalism is based upon consumption. No demand, no growth. Consolidate wealth too vastly, velocity of money falls, and economy cannot grow absent an increase in the money supply. That's inflationary.
It's a wish and a prayer that cutting revenues will eventually, someday, maybe or maybe not, but we're really hoping for it, cause growth and smaller deficits. Just stupid.