Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums‘The Die Has Been Cast’: Ron Paul Makes Closing Argument Ahead Of Iowa
The Die Has Been Cast: Ron Paul Makes Closing Argument Ahead Of Iowa
<...>
Ron Pauls closing message ahead of the Iowa caucuses goes a little something like this: Ive always been here, you guys just started noticing.
Its not because Ive changed my message, he told FOX Newss Chris Wallace, in one of several interviews on the Sunday political talk show circuit. This is what Ive worked my whole career to warn people about, he said, dismissing criticism that hes a candidate of the lunatic fringe.
<...>
And the Texas congressman is sticking to his Libertarian guns. He doubled down on statements from one of his books, downplaying the need for sexual harassment laws in the workplace. Because people are insulted by behavior, I dont think we should make a federal case out of that, Paul said on FOX News Sunday, saying that unless there is a threat or act of violence, a sexually harassed person could choose or not choose to work at the offending location.
To be clear, Paul seemed to be speaking literally about federal laws, which would be consistent with his belief that most power should rest with state governments. But he was very dismissive about the idea that a worker should have legal recourse if they are harassed in the workplace, saying that the individuals should be left to work that out themselves in lieu of government action.
- more -
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/the-die-has-been-cast-ron-paul-makes-closing-argument-to-iowa.php?ref=fpa
<...>
Ron Pauls closing message ahead of the Iowa caucuses goes a little something like this: Ive always been here, you guys just started noticing.
Its not because Ive changed my message, he told FOX Newss Chris Wallace, in one of several interviews on the Sunday political talk show circuit. This is what Ive worked my whole career to warn people about, he said, dismissing criticism that hes a candidate of the lunatic fringe.
<...>
And the Texas congressman is sticking to his Libertarian guns. He doubled down on statements from one of his books, downplaying the need for sexual harassment laws in the workplace. Because people are insulted by behavior, I dont think we should make a federal case out of that, Paul said on FOX News Sunday, saying that unless there is a threat or act of violence, a sexually harassed person could choose or not choose to work at the offending location.
To be clear, Paul seemed to be speaking literally about federal laws, which would be consistent with his belief that most power should rest with state governments. But he was very dismissive about the idea that a worker should have legal recourse if they are harassed in the workplace, saying that the individuals should be left to work that out themselves in lieu of government action.
- more -
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/the-die-has-been-cast-ron-paul-makes-closing-argument-to-iowa.php?ref=fpa
Yup, he has "always been here."
In Book, Ron Paul Opposed Workplace Harassment Protections
Ron Paul may be be polling well in Iowa, but hes had a tough few weeks denying responsibility for racist and homophobic material once published under his name. Now, we can add womens rights to the list. And this time, it will be hard for Paul to place the blame on another author.
As highlighted by CNN on Friday, in his 1987 book, Freedom Under Siege: The U.S. Constitution After 200-Plus Years, republished in 2007, Ron Paul made some eyebrow-raising statements about sexual harassment and womens rights in the workplace:
<...>
<...>
Other passages in the book include jabs about LGBT people and AIDS. Like the notorious newsletters which include unsavory passages about the AIDS epidemic, Paul writes that the Founding Fathers probably wouldnt favor AIDS research and that insurance companies should have the right to refuse care to patients with HIV/AIDS:
And of course, Paul also takes issue with minority rights, wondering, if theres a black and hispanic caucus in Congress, why not a white one too?
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/in-book-ron-paul-opposed-workplace-harassment-protections.php
Ron Paul may be be polling well in Iowa, but hes had a tough few weeks denying responsibility for racist and homophobic material once published under his name. Now, we can add womens rights to the list. And this time, it will be hard for Paul to place the blame on another author.
As highlighted by CNN on Friday, in his 1987 book, Freedom Under Siege: The U.S. Constitution After 200-Plus Years, republished in 2007, Ron Paul made some eyebrow-raising statements about sexual harassment and womens rights in the workplace:
Employee rights are said to be valid when employers pressure employees into sexual activity. Why dont they quit once the so-called harassment starts? Obviously the morals of the harasser cannot be defended, but how can the harassee escape some responsibility for the problem? Seeking protection under civil rights legislation is hardly acceptable.
<...>
The concept of equal pay for equal work is not only an impossible task, it can only be accomplished with the total rejection of the idea of the voluntary contract. By what right does the government assume power to tell an airline it must hire unattractive women if it does not want to?
<...>
Other passages in the book include jabs about LGBT people and AIDS. Like the notorious newsletters which include unsavory passages about the AIDS epidemic, Paul writes that the Founding Fathers probably wouldnt favor AIDS research and that insurance companies should have the right to refuse care to patients with HIV/AIDS:
Victims of the disease AIDS argue
for crash research programs (to be paid for by people who dont have AIDS), demanding a cure
The individual suffering from AIDS certainly is a victim frequently a victim of his own lifestyle but this same individual victimizes innocent citizens by forcing them to pay for his care. Crash research programs are hardly something, I believe, the Founding Fathers intended when they talked about equal rights.
And of course, Paul also takes issue with minority rights, wondering, if theres a black and hispanic caucus in Congress, why not a white one too?
White people who organize and expect the same attention as other groups are quickly and viciously condemned as dangerous bigots. Hispanic, black, and Jewish caucuses can exist in the U.S. Congress, but not a white caucus, demonstrating the absurdity of this approach for achieving rights for everyone.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/in-book-ron-paul-opposed-workplace-harassment-protections.php
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1950 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘The Die Has Been Cast’: Ron Paul Makes Closing Argument Ahead Of Iowa (Original Post)
ProSense
Jan 2012
OP
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)1. Why are you supporting Gingrich?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Wrong
"Why are you supporting Gingrich?"
...person: http://www.democraticunderground.com/100298462
Obama 2012!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)3. Still,
"Why are you supporting Gingrich?"
..."are you supporting Paul?"
quinnox
(20,600 posts)4. lol, careful Prosense, your headline could be misconstrued as being favorable towards Ron Paul
It almost sounds like a Ron Paul press release: "Ron Paul makes closing argument ahead of Iowa"
Now, I rather doubt you are a Ron Paul supporter, but the headline certainly sounds pro-Ron Paul to me.
"lol, careful Prosense, your headline could be misconstrued as being favorable towards Ron Paul"
...I doubt it. I mean, there's nothing in it that says anything like: "Ron Paul threatens Democrats" or "Ron Paul is a lunatic, but at least he's anti war"
The headline is a generic as: Ron Paul is a candidate for President.