General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats scour map for sleeper races
To expand House playing field, party officials bet on long-shot districts.
By DAVID SIDERS 12/08/2017 06:13 PM EST
TRUCKEE, Calif. Following their Election Day romp in Virginia, New Jersey and a handful of other states, Democrats rushed to fan the prospect of a wave election in 2018.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee quickly added 11 more Republican-held districts long-shot seats that arent typically in play to its existing list of 80 targeted races. Candidates in those newly added seats got a sudden dose of fundraising and organizational assistance, in addition to help with budgeting and media operations.
The incumbent Republicans in those seats, some of them unaccustomed to vigorous challenges, are already feeling the squeeze. California Rep. Tom McClintock, who represents one of the newly added districts, acknowledged a huge enthusiasm gap that favors the Democrats right now.
I think in a lot of ways, its the 2010 dynamic in reverse, he said.
Rep. Glenn Grothman one of two Wisconsin Republicans on the list, which includes House Speaker Paul Ryan told the local WISN-AM radio station last month that his campaign was not raising as much money as we should.
more
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/08/democrats-election-long-shot-districts-287916
blue neen
(12,327 posts)Let's ditch Rothfus!
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)check it out here, scroll to the bottom for the complete list:
https://dccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/20171109_year-out-memo.pdf
Heartstrings
(7,349 posts)Say that name 3 times a day!
Help Wisconsin rid the nation of Lyin' Ryan!
Wounded Bear
(58,698 posts)Assuming we get a census in 2020 (I'm starting to wonder about that), there will be re-alignment of districts again. Frankly, that will mean that several blue states will probably get additional districts. Most red states will not get new districts, and several will likely lose seats. This is one reason the Repubs have been in such intense panic mode to game/steal the system. The demographics are starting to become insurmountable. For Dems, if we want to reverse the Reaganite trends of the last half century, the big push needs to come NOW. Another Repub win might make it permanent. The drift towards fascism will continue apace, and the future will start looking more and more like 1984.
I'm loving what I'm hearing about the number of women running for office, at all levels across the country. While Dems won't win all of the races, we can't win if we don't even run. With what the Repubs are pulling off, Dems should have some really good issues to run on. But much work needs to be done.
Ace Rothstein
(3,183 posts)Illinois is definitely going to lose a seat, possibly New York, Minnesota and Rhode Island as well. Texas and Florida can very well pick up multiple seats. This probably isn't going to work out well for us.
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)Kaleva
(36,332 posts)Mi-01
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the DCCC and DSCC, and also liberal donors looking for people to back, to widen their perceptions of potentially electable candidates they need to invest in.
In blood-red Alabama, Jones of course didn't talk to nation-wide passions on the left by badmouthing Trump and other Republican leaders, much less Republicans, and of course he's not capital-P Progressive, so no interest from that direction. And, above all, he's pro-abortion in Alabama. Good luck with that, Doug.
Then Roy Moore's sexual depravity is outed a month before election day, and a suddenly viable Democratic candidate just as suddenly becomes underfunded and underdiscussed, and we're scrambling to help maximize his chances.
Maybe we should also invest in investigating Republican candidates a lot more also. That party's become so corrupted and extreme that there's really something wrong with a lot of those who want to become official swamp creatures. We shouldn't have been surprised by the WaPo revelations when just a little digging in his home town would have turned them up.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)If this were a NOvember election with 32 other senate seats up, they just wouldn't have the funds to pour into it. One advantage of special elections is that you don't have to spread resources across campaigns like you do in a regular cycle.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Suggests more potential for grabbing some unclaimed attention too.
Nay
(12,051 posts)would not be in the predicament we are now in.