Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:00 PM Dec 2017

Gillibrand...

I watched in horror as Franken got swiftboated over that picture. Then watched in horror again as over half the Dems in the Senate threw him under the bus.

Why? Thirteen intelligent and ambitious women followed Gillibrand into this swamp, and I don't understand why. Then a bunch of men signed on.

Gillibrand has been taking a lead on taking on sexual assault. It's the thing she talks about most, although complaining about Trump is fast catching up. It's almost as though she and Schumer have divided up the issues, and that's one of hers and she is running with it. She was one of the first to call for vengeance on Franken while Moore seems headed for the Senate.

I just don't get it. Losing a very valuable Senate seat while worse offenders are out there? What's the point?

It could be that this is where they take their stand for virtue, or maybe there's worse stuff we don't know about. Or, is there a plan?

Gillibrand is up for re-election in 2020. She denies she's running for President, but so does Harris and everyone else deny they're running for President-- the first one out the door is the biggest target.

The thing is that three years is an eternity in politics, so what is the real plan?

I voted for her in the past, and I'll vote for her again, but I'd like to know more about this.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
1. I believe the strategy goes something like this ...
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:08 PM
Dec 2017

as in baseball, Franken is persuaded to take one for the team. Then the Dems in 2018 and 2020 can take the "high road" and proclaim moral indignation about GOP acquisence about sexual predators. It ain't fair, but life ain't fair. Al Franken's political career ain't over.

FarPoint

(12,409 posts)
6. This is weak as soaked bread in milk...
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:14 PM
Dec 2017

Let's not forget how we NEVER got to seat the Supreme Court Justice....

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
3. I posted this...
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:10 PM
Dec 2017

.... In another thread, and I will repeat it here. This is just my opinion on gillibrand.


I have noticed that after calling for Al Franken's resignation and being successful in that effort, Kristen Gillibrand is now, after the fact, using Twitter to call out Roy Moore and Donald Trump. Something she has declined to do before as far as I can tell. After successfully outing a prominent Democrat under highly suspect circumstances, then calling out Trump and Moore, seems to be a message to the public that she will be a fair and balanced candidate for a 2020 presidential run.
She led the call for Al franken's resignation even as more than a few republicans expressed their doubts as to Franken's accusers and the circumstances of the whole affair. I am also thoroughly convinced that the majority of Democrats who fell in line with Kristen gillibrand did so out of a fear of being perceived as soft on sexual assault on women rather than a genuine conviction of principle. I think more than a few of these people are privately regretting their actions.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. She has been calling out Roy Moore and Donald Trump since day one
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:11 PM
Dec 2017

That you think this is "something she has declined to do" is part of the problem.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
13. I did say.
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:30 PM
Dec 2017

.."as far as I can tell". I think she did say something right after Trump was elected but I can't find anything since.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
15. Fair enough
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:38 PM
Dec 2017

I can tell you that she has said she would vote to expel Roy Moore and has called him disgusting numerous times.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
7. Because of the way it was handled her credibility on the issue has been wiped out.
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:17 PM
Dec 2017

I think her actions have made her voice mute on the subject. No one wants lynch mobs, they are extremely dangerous.

By leading a lynch mob based on flimsy evidence over minor charges she has equated misplaced hands with pussy grabbing. It makes a mockery of actual victims.

Not only has she taken out a very effective senator but she has destroyed her own credibility.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
14. After taking the Clintons money and support...
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:33 PM
Dec 2017

.... for 20 years and then saying Bill should have resigned is the trait of an opportunist. Apparently, she doesn't need them anymore.

brooklynite

(94,587 posts)
11. A month before any accusations were made against Franken...
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:29 PM
Dec 2017

...the Minnesota Governor and Party leadership demanded the resignation of a Democratic State Senator over sexual harassment charges from multiple women, including an "anonymous one". Nobody called for due process. Nobody claimed this was "political ambition". Nobody fretted that this would "depress turnout".

https://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2017/11/dayton-joins-chorus-political-leaders-calling-state-sen-dan-schoen-resign-wa?utm_content=buffer08130&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Cartoonist

(7,317 posts)
12. I'm taking the high ground
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 12:30 PM
Dec 2017

I'm calling for Gillibrand's resignation for putting her own ambition over party and country.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
19. When the Democratic Women Senators essentially closed ranks against Franken
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 02:54 PM
Dec 2017

They sealed the deal. Had they been split, or had the majority of female Democratic Senators at least stayed silent, then the male members of the Democratic caucus might have had enough cover to perhaps stake out a different position if they disagreed with calling for Al's resignation. Realistically, on the issue of male sexual harassment of women, no male Democratic Senator was going to openly resist the consensus position of their female colleagues on this one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gillibrand...