General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Democrats win even if they lose in Alabama
Why Democrats win even if they lose in Alabama
The party will either pick up a seat in the Deep South or have Roy Moore to campaign against in the midterms.
By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE
12/10/2017 06:51 AM EST
Democrats head into Tuesdays Senate election in Alabama confident that they'll come out on top no matter who wins.
And many Republicans agree with them.
If Doug Jones prevails, Democrats expect it will further excite their base, bolster candidate recruitment and fuel fundraising heading into 2018, coming off their near-sweep of last month's elections. They will revel in picking up a Senate seat in the Deep South, especially in a state so central to President Donald Trumps political rise and where he earlier backed the loser of the GOP primary. Practically, Republicans would have a 51-49 Senate majority, leaving them with a single vote to spare assuming Democrats stick together.
But the alternative won't make for bad politics, either, Democrats say.
If Roy Moore wins, they'll spend the next year yoking every Republican they can to the accused child predator and a president who welcomed him into the GOP fold. They'll be quick to remind everyone of all the other comments Moore has made against Muslims and gays and in favor of Vladimir Putins view of America as evil, as well as his rosy view of slave-era America.
Hell be the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats. If youre running in 2018, Roy Moores going to be your new best friend. As a Republican, to think that you can win without the baggage of Roy Moore is pretty naive, said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
more...
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/10/democrats-alabama-roy-moore-doug-jones-288631
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)Looking like added compost for us ...GOP power grabbing remains ahead.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)THIS.
old guy
(3,283 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I want to live in this universe where Republican hypocrisy hurts the Republican Party, but I don't. I live here.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)in Virginia. Northam and the down-ballot did very well in the suburbs.
If we can continue to win suburbs and college educated whites we'll do very well in 2018.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)But Republican hypocrisy has been so rampant for the last several decades that "Republican" is synonymous with "hypocrite." And yet they have about as much power right now as any party has ever had.
Democrats can win but it won't be because of Republican hypocrisy.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)but they're now hitching the wagon to a pedophile. We've started to win just because of Trump himself. This is a massive albatross and it's exactly why the scumbags that make up the WSJ editorial board is asking Trump to disavow Moore. Even they figured out that backing a pedophile isn't a good idea.
kacekwl
(7,017 posts)but that information and supposed power has to be used. We'll see how that goes.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)This will be a win even if we lose: The bigots and zealots will know their dynasty of hatred is eroding right underneath them.
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)Plus, the R's KNOW they're in trouble, either way the election goes.
Either they face the dreadful prospect of a DEMOCRAT in their Senate, lol!
Or they know we will yoke every R candidate to Moore heading up to the Midterms!
It's a win-win for us Democrats.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,343 posts)And meanwhile, the Supreme Court gets stacked with morans.
A Dem victory would seem simpler, more direct.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Just a simple regular win would be nice.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)The Alabama Democratic Party could barely afford rent and utilities at Headquarters.
The fact that they're close to picking up a federal senate seat is amazing. If nothing else, it allows them to start to rebuild and become a viable party again (and keep current with rent/utilities).
dawg
(10,624 posts)Seems like that's all I get these days.
Things go against me, and I try to figure out some reason why I'm better off that way.
Xolodno
(6,395 posts)Once in, he's going to want to stay in. Which means on some issues, he's not going to vote "D" to appease voters at home. And when a critical piece of legislation comes up and if there isn't a significant Democratic majority, we may not be able to count on him.
Kaleva
(36,307 posts)We'll have control of the committee's .