Cause lots of variables... but she would probably not be my first choice.

I think Kristen Gillibrand would be a weak candidate against Trump or any Republican in the general election.

Bob Ferguson for attorney grneral.

And, while I can understand your choice as a fellow Washington state resident, the Constitution penalizes a party from putting two people from the same state on its presidential ticket...if any party does that, it forfeits that state's electoral votes.

n/t.

are really off track damning her.

Just trying to get some sort of sense about her support level here.

. . .i would opine that Ms. Gillibrand is part of the purity police.

for years, she hasn't done anything like this before.

She has been far too smart and cunning so far to do anything so destructive, so one wonders what's really up.

I do love her ability to articulate the poverty issues

bc I don't know who she would be running against. There are better candidates. There are worse candidates. I certainly would vote for her in the General Election if she won the primary. Probably wouldn't vote for her in the primaries, though that would depend on a whole list of variables. (So I didn't vote in this poll.)

Whoever we put up as a presidential candidate means nothing in the grand scheme of things. If the Democratic party truly wants to be a force for good, it needs to start rebuilding from the ground up. I grew up in solidly blue Democrat territory. After 16 years away I was shocked at the right wing swing of those I had grown up with. After almost another 16 years, I'm befuddled that the Democratic party still hasn't a clue that they are eroding and ignoring their base.
I'm encouraged that DSA candidates have been beating established Democrats on the local level. Mabey that will be the wakeup call.

I hope she doesn't run and, if she does, isn't the nominee.

Apart from the Franken thing, I don't think she has what it takes to beat Trump, assuming he runs again.