General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWoman mauled to death by her dogs while taking them for a walk
Bethany Lynn Stephens' father called 911 Thursday, at about 8:18 p.m., when he went looking for his daughter off Manakin Road in Goochland, where she often walked her dogs.
He discovered her dogs in the woods, and he told the sheriff's office the dogs appeared to be "guarding" Bethany's body, according to WTVR.
Sheriff's deputies arrived and spent 60 to 90 minutes attempting to catch the dogs -- which the sheriff described as pit bull dogs.
Bethany's body was taken to the Medical Examiner's Office.
"It appeared the attack was a violent attack initiated by the victims' dogs while the victim was out for a walk with the dogs," Sheriff Agnew said the Medical Examiner's initial report indicated. "The victim had defensive wounds on her hands and arms trying to keep the dogs away from her, which would be consistent with being attacked while she was still alive."
http://kdvr.com/2017/12/15/woman-mauled-to-death-by-her-dogs-while-taking-them-for-a-walk/
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)at her home. I'm guessing, but I bet those dogs weren't raised to be friendly dogs. That's not a good mix with pit bulls.
ClarendonDem
(720 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)their pack of pit bulls. Think white wing gunners who proudly display confederate flags.
ClarendonDem
(720 posts)And the only person I know who owns a pit-bull is a family member. Super-sweet dog, but I'm generally wary of pit-bulls and wouldn't want it around my dogs.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)concealed carry permit office, etc., own confederate flags.
ClarendonDem
(720 posts)But anyway, can you provide any support for your contention that "a bunch of folks" at ranges, gun stores, and gun shows or "concealed carry permit office" (what is that, by the way?), own confederate flags? And not some random picture but actual statistical support.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)ClarendonDem
(720 posts)Setting aside the fact that you keep moving the goal posts, what am I supposed to look up? Are "rabid NRA supporters" different from regular NRA supporters, who presumably are different from the group you first identified? I'm not sure I've ever seen an article that equates "rabid NRA supporters" with owning dangerous pit bulls. I don't suppose you have any evidence for that claim either?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)ClarendonDem
(720 posts)Apologies for jumping the gun on my response. But I think the question is a fair one--any sort of statistical support for the claim that "rabid" NRA supporters/gun jumpers are also fans of the confederate flag and aggressive pit-bulls? And what makes you think I'm defending "rabid gun jumpers"? Asking you to support your position isn't defending the acts of someone else.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'd dig in on this irrelevancy as well if I desired the pretense of cleverness.
I'd also lie to myself and rationalize it as relevant.
ClarendonDem
(720 posts)Whether someone supports the NRA or is a fan of confederate flags has nothing to do with whether their dog might be prone to violence. Irrelevant as you say.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)At first I just noticed all of the very large wooden crosses in front yards. Then I thought I saw a Gazelle so I pulled over and got out of the car with my camera. Guy had about fifty of them from what I could see. Not a big plot of land or anything.
I heard the first group of dogs before I took my first picture. They were fenced in across the street but I still got right back in my car. The three Pits had anger issues.
Two more Pits came out of the driveway of the house with the Gazelles a minute later. They were not restrained and also had anger issues. I drove away with them wanting a piece of my car.
Thats when I noticed house after house with Pits or Rottweilers. It was a Florida summer day and most were laying under trees. One I saw was chained to a tractor tire and Im certain it could drag it.
Other than attitude they were stunning dogs. Extremely muscular and it didnt look like they missed any meals.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)We'd pull up at some old farm house in North Georgia out in the middle of nowhere and I'd start getting out. He'd grab me and say wait. Sure as chit, a big pack of dogs would come running out showing teeth.
We are talking Deliverance country.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)here in Florida is like that. Our own is just a short road off a highway ending at our place, but my neighbor and I never extend our walks over there because of a large number of aggressive dogs. Chain link fences are expensive these days, so a fair number in a low-income neighborhood is a very good initial clue that pedestrians had better be very cautious. Standard height is much too short to stop a real dog attack.
As I said on another post, a friend's daughter's pit bull went over her taller board fence one day and killed a woman out for her daily walk. "Nice" dog. She'd even walked over to be petted the couple times I saw her.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)underpants
(182,823 posts)Some local knowledge
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 16, 2017, 05:45 PM - Edit history (1)
racism, GOPers, etc.
I'm not the only one who believes this. Here's a little bit from the Anti-Defecation League: (Edit Defamation. Sorry.)
"The pit bull has long been used as a skinhead symbol, presumably because of its reputation as a "fighting" dog. Many racist skinheads and other white supremacists own or even raise pit bulls. White supremacists use one specific pit bull graphic so often that it has become a white supremacist symbol itself. One racist skinhead group, the Keystone State Skinheads (at one time known as Keystone United) even adopted it as part of their logo.
https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/pit-bull
I don't know for a fact that this lady is like that, but I know what I think of when I see a confederate flag hanging in someone's house.
underpants
(182,823 posts)Just saying
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)house. You are arguing something I am not saying.
Again, I'm speculating based upon my experiences with people with confederate flags. I'm not saying she deserved to be attacked. I am saying that if she or others living with her raised those dogs as I suspect, one can't really be surprised at the results.
underpants
(182,823 posts)I think a lot of people use these types dogs to show toughness in themselves. I can't say I see a lot of skinheads anyway.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)earthshine
(1,642 posts)Near my Mom's house is this family that I have seen be deliberately mean to their pit bull just to keep it barking and dangerous.
They tease it. Snap at it. All while it is tied up on a short leash to a tree.
It's how these dogs are trained that matters.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)You can NEVER eliminate it, but you can train around it. For example, you should never let this type of dog get worked up like watching the neighbors cat walk across your yard.
The training required to keep these guys is more than just a puppy class. Lots of work required. Most are not prepared to do what is needed to keep such a dog.
Loving it and treating it like a kid is not going to help
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Mistreat any dog and you can have problems. You should never let any dog get worked up watching a cat.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Dogs are working animals. NILIF approach is best for almost all dogs. Stimulation of their mind and reinforcement of whose in charge
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)I am surprised you have not done so already. Posting about it on a message board does nothing to help those poor dogs.
earthshine
(1,642 posts)If I thought calling the police could do something, I would have.
It's deep in the heart of Brooklyn. Cops don't respond to nuisance dog calls.
I'm just wanting to get my Mom out of there, but it's been her home for almost 50 years.
I didn't post here to help the dogs, ya know?
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)They are animal aggressive and have it in their genetic make up to love to fight. Thats kinda the breeding model and has been for centuries. Those owners wouldnt tolerate a people aggressive animal. Theyd be killed. They want to make money on the deal and are generally quite well off.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)But why she was doing it is anyone's guess
janx
(24,128 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)of the high concentration of PB's owned by the Black living in city limits.
Glorfindel
(9,730 posts)What a frustrated group this "league" must be, uncomfortable and self-loathing while also hating everyone else. I'll bet their meetings are very interesting, too!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)One dog plus one living anything, like a human for instance, is a pack.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)Sure, dogs are pack animals. People in a sense are also. People join together both in violent militias, and in disaster relief efforts. People function in groups, not all groups are the same.
I work in dog care. Where I work three yards are fenced in together and the dogs in care come and go from the house into the yard, and sleep in the home of the business owner on couches and dog beds throughout the house. Maybe 60 dogs are regulars and on any given day between 5 to 20 of them could be present. They experience themselves as a pack and all come to know each other and maintain friendships with each other. Some want to be more dominant than others but each dog knows we are the pack leaders and that we do not tolerate aggressive behavior between them. They chill with each other and they "apologize" immediately if we have to reprimand them for anything. They seek our love and attention. They are relaxed, and as friendly to those who have reason to come onto the property as a group as each one of them would be individually.
Yes, not properly supervised and poorly socialized dogs can embolden each other in negative ways when in packs. In that way those dogs do become more dangerous in groups. But groups of dogs (packs) can be delightfully playful and loving and very attentive to the wants and needs of their pack leader or leaders - their loving and responsible people.
And the instances of families with two or three dogs who all get along lovingly with each other and those around them are too numerous to call attention to. It depends on the dogs and the people. Some people should not have one dog, let alone two or more of them.
beveeheart
(1,369 posts)6 to 12 dogs in her house, all of them getting along with each other.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)One day while her husband was out the dogs held her hostage in the corner of the garage for 3 hours until he came home.
beveeheart
(1,369 posts)milestogo
(16,829 posts)Great hunting dogs, but they can be very aggressive. She was absolutely terrified.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Had a nasty streak. American version gsps are pretty docile. Even the modern Kurzhaars don't have that edge anymore.
janx
(24,128 posts)Oh my God, they are NOT.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)On an Ahnentafel of Kurzhaars, but it was not common.
American lines are just docile. I suspect most lines were watered down with English pointer blood by unscrupulous breeders.
Rawhides Clown was a pointer with a docked tail and no one will convince me otherwise. He also threw pups that just liked to run and is generally a dog I try to avoid in a pedigree.
janx
(24,128 posts)Seriously?
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)They could be civil, but I doubt that's what happened here , the lines are not common. However, you never know
janx
(24,128 posts)Somebody seriously messed these dogs up if your story is true.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Also, we had a GSP as a family pet when I was growing up. Before he was 2 years old he had bitten everyone in the family and we had to have him put down. The vet said that it was "bad breeding".
Irish_Dem
(47,114 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)It's a result of poor breeding. Dog sees a cat, raccoon, deer, etc. Prey drive kicks in. Dog gets WAY TOO agitated. 22 year old tiny woman is completely unable to control two powerful dogs. Probably does not even have proper collars. She cannot redirect them, but tries. Dogs in highly agitated state, now in complete RED ZONE DRIVE. A man my size with a two by four might have a shot, her??? Nope.
Dog bites, she screams and flails. This excited the dog. It goes deeper into prey drive. Other dog joins in. It feels the energy and is now in the RED ZONE.
That's how this shit happens.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)a pit-lab mix, was jumped on by a bunch 3 yorkies without a leash while I was walking him. He just hid between my legs while the 3 little Yorkies barked at him. Poor dog!
Irish_Dem
(47,114 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)The owners were very nice people who raised her very gently from a pup. She got a lot of attention, play time, and walk run time.
I love dogs and think that i understand them but she was a handful. We collectively made sure she had adequate physical outlets. She needed it. I would wrestle with her in the back yard and play tug of war with her with some old tube socks tied together. The physical play was her safety valve. If she did not get that physical play time for a few days she would get wound up and exhibit exactly the kind of behavior you describe. Like when one of us would get home from work and open the door she would do somerhing like bolt out the door and chase down the neighbors cat while you yelled stop. She would usually just sort of run over the cat and not bite it.
In the summer I would run 3 or 4 miles with her every evening. If we were all going to be away for the weekend I would drive her 45 miles to my parents house so they could watch her (and she wasn't even my dog).
She was a member if the family.
She a very bright dog and she a sense of the hierarchy of the pack and it seem to cause confusion for her. Her male owner was the alpha but I was also a male and due to work schedules I spent more time with her. She seemed to try and push her boundaries and needed a dominate presence to guide her . Her female owner would at times let her out on her own to do her business in the early morning and it would drive me nuts. I caught her once as she had our neighbor in a standoff as he tried to get into his BMW with his three piece on. I ran out and grabbed her and hoisted her up and apologized profusely
I loved the dog but made the decision that I would never own one or trust my kids around one when that time came.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Totally different
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)A possible scenario is that they met a strange dog, a fight started, she stepped in to try to stop it, and after she was inadvertently injured they turned on her.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)More likely is they saw a deer, squirrel, or really anything that triggered that drive. They got excited, turned on her in their heightened drive out of frustration.
If they we're in defense drive from another dog, they likely would not have killed her. Defense ends when the threat is eliminated.
It's why pits are shitty in general at schutzhund work. They only have prey drives and never operate out of defense. It's not a good attribute for a protection dog.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I read once that pit bulls may not display signs of potential attack ahead of time, like with ears and tails. Is that something you believe to be the case?
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Pits operate in prey drive. Does a lion roar before it pounces on a zebra? Of course not. Those postures/ displays are from defense drives. "Don't mess with me or I will hurt you!"
Prey drive is not precluded with postures. It's hunting. It's silent, fast, and each attack is meant to kill.
Defense is loud, ostentatious, and attacks are in areas not made to cause real damage.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)I have to ask, how do you know it was her dogs that killed her? It very well could have been a third dog or fourth or fifth.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Its pretty obvious if they had done it. Why put on the tinfoil hat?
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Said it appears to have been her dogs. Granted the reporter took that and ran with it but the word "appears" implies there is no definitive proof it was her dogs. I'm not saying it wasn't and I'm not saying it was and I grant you it may have been.
The article does not mention discovery of human remains in her dogs mouths which would be something investigators could be checking for I would think.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)I think it's pretty obvious
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)You would have to see if it was the victims as it could have been the perpetrators.
I want to once again state it may very well have been her own dogs but there is no conclusive evidence given in this article. It was gruesome yes. Her pit bulls may have been covered in blood I didn't see that in the article but it is possible. Even so, a proper investigation would include a thorough analysis of both the dogs mouths and stomach content and not just an assumption based on initial impressions.
oasis
(49,388 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)I'm going to go ahead and laugh under the assumption that you're making a funny comment.
oasis
(49,388 posts)for solving numerous crimes by instinctively not taking fatal events at face value.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The important thing is to discount anything that's not obvious.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Pretty obvious...
defacto7
(13,485 posts)I've posted similar in years past to angry mobs who take extreme stances ignoring the basic understanding of the non-breed pitbull type canine. It can have wonderful characteristcs but the basic kill instinct bread through pit fighting is still innate and very likely still sits just under the surface. It's a dog one needs a lot of experience to own.
Another interesting case is the Timber Wolf or mixes that surface from time to time. They are workable but the owners life is in danger if they so much as cut their finger. Blood is the trigger. Basic blood or hunting instincts are nothing to fool with in certain canines.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)womanofthehills
(8,712 posts)after a squirrel. I have a tree house about 6 feet off the ground for my grandson and they literally ran right up the tree after the squirrel. I never before saw dogs run up a tree, but their adrenaline was off the wall.
They dug under my fence and charged me and bit my dog, but luckily my screaming and rock throwing made them run off.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)You cannot let high prey drive dogs get like that. It's dangerous
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)I listened to the news, but they never mentioned how many dogs she was walking. Just wondering if the possible pack-went pack.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)According to another article I read.
Response to oberliner (Original post)
Post removed
oberliner
(58,724 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Yup, I knew it.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I am confused.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)As sure as the sun sets in the west.......
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Thanks for clarifying.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Most people have no business owning these dogs
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Newfoundlands or Newfies, on the other hand are often referred to as Nanny dogs. Huh. I like pitbulls in general but are often raised poorly. The last thing I would call them is a nanny dog
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Perpetuated by people who have a thimble full of dog sense.
These are big, powerful, and breed dogs. They are serious dogs that require serious owners. Many people get them to "prove" they know what they are doing. Mostly they just get lucky and get a good natured dog.
Those who deny the power of genetics just don't get it. Try to get an English breed show lab to take a blind line 400 yards. Most cannot, but a field trial breed lab will hammer down with enthusiasm.
Get an American showline German shepherd and put him in prey drive to hit the sleeve. Most just don't care. Now go get a Czech bred or DDR bred and watch a four month old puppy hit that flirt pole with gusto.
Owning serious dogs has lots of requirements. Mine are on concrete and priefert kennels when not in the house or the yard training with me. Simply housing them is different.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)But this is the first time I've ever heard pit bulls called Nanny dogs, in real life or here on DU (Not disputing it happens though)and agree it's total BS.
Newfoundlands are the true Nanny Dogs.
http://nannydog.info/nanny-dog-breeds/newfoundland/
The Newfoundland is the archetype nanny dog. Nana the Newfoundland in the story of Peter Pan was hired by Mr. Darling to be his childrens nanny. This is the origin of the concept nanny dog which we celebrate on this website. J.M. Barrie wrote the play Peter Pan which was first produced on stage in 1904, and based Nana on his and his wife Marys own Newfoundland named Luath. Mary once said, Luaths proper place was the nursery. How happy he would have been if there had been one, full of gloriously noisy children!
I'd no sooner have a pit bull or even a mixed breed dog I knew nothing of as far as breed serve as a nanny to my children than I would have a labrador serve as an attack dog because of the long history of breeding that emphasized the traits each breed is known and chosen for.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)It is bullshit.
flvegan
(64,408 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Pit breeders suck.
Tell me about the breed tests that responsible pitbull breeders put their dogs through to ensure the animals are physically and mentally sound. What does the national breed club recommend? What are the breeding goals of a reputable pit bull breeder? Where can I find the records like the stud book?
Oh yeah, there are none...
Just a bunch of irresponsible people breeding crap dogs indescrimently that are filling up shelters.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)again and again at a guessing 16' fence topped with razor wire that I was walking by on the OTHER side of a wide but quiet commercial boulevard. They couldn't get over and were trying to get through it to kill me.
They were brought each day by specially clothed handlers to protect some kind of welding operation. But in any case, I thought it was just training of selected ordinary shepherds that produced that and wondered at it. Obviously not.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Even the bite work stuff is just a game. The real dogs, the serious ones, they call them "civil", the true man stoppers are usually specially bred litters and breeders only sell them to the police or military
Stinky The Clown
(67,806 posts)I have never owned a pit bull, but I have owned MANY dogs. All of them except the latest were rescues of uncertain origins and environments.
EACH ONE was an individual with individual personalties. Each one had its own unique set of needs. GSDs are my favored breed. I had one that was the gentlest creature ever to breathe air. Another was quite the opposite.
"Pit bulls" (<--a made up catch-all name, not a breed) are no different. Each animal is unique.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)From field trial retrievers, schutzhund and IPO, and NAVDHA. I've even worked with APHIS professional hunters for depredation hunts with hounds.
I have a minor in ethology and studied under Ann Beckhoff and her husband. Carolyn Rosteau too who is a protege of Donald Griffin.
I have studied pedigrees and breed books and produced a few litters of VHD dogs that won me a breeders award.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Period.
janx
(24,128 posts)I still miss my Weim.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)For hunting. The instinct is diluted as they have turned into pets and bred for looks rather than ability.
There are still good weims in Europe, but not many pups get imported. They are expensive and really cannot do anything a well bred pudelpointer or Deutsch Kurzhaar can't do better for was less money. There are a few fanciers here who have good ones, but waiting lists are long.
Americans and the British have a knack for ruining breeds
janx
(24,128 posts)I've known some hunters who have used them and haven't complained, but I guess there are different levels of enthusiasm for hunting.
You clearly love working dogs, and that is admirable. Dogs are happiest when they're working.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Them here to their former abilities.
A lot of hunters have pretty low thresholds for what they consider "good". Really, about 80% of the "hunting dogs" out there are really just going for a walk in the fields with their owner and are NOT out there finding birds. When a bird is shot the dog runs over, mouths it a few times, and that's good.
That's cool if everyone is happy. I like to put fire on the ground and watch the show. Effortless running, bending to the wind for the scent, then BAM! Slam on point. Hold steady through flush and fall then a good mark and retrieve to hand.
Really, fun watching all those careful breedings and then the right training come together.
janx
(24,128 posts)even if they don't hunt. (Yes, I realize that constant breeding of Weims as pets might weaken the hunting brain power, but they have adapted to other things such as agility, sniffer dogs, etc.) I'm getting older now and would love another Weim pup, but I don't know that I would have the physical stamina or the time to do the dog justice. I'm away from my home 12 hours a day, three days a week, and that would be horrible for a Weim puppy, even if I had months off to raise it in the summer. You cannot kennel these dogs; it's not in their background. They are historically codependent hunting dogs who are used to hanging out with the fam in the house.
It is wonderful that people in the U.S. are paying attention to the Weim's mental, working abilities and keeping those alive. That is ultimately the only way to preserve their brains and hearts, even for people who keep them as pets and do things like this with them:
As an interesting aside--my son used to be a dog handler/trainer for Iditarod dogs. Some of the dogs were part GSP. I went to Alaska and was lucky enough to meet the people and dogs who were some top contenders and see what was involved. One summer, I camped on a glacier up there and navigated some wet and icy terrain on a sled. There is a lot of amateur breeding theory regarding these sled dogs. It's interesting to watch. Once again, it boils down to genetics and acquired characteristics as well as training.
You are obviously passionate and knowledgeable about dogs. Thanks for all of your comments here.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Never the finish. I have some autographed stuff from Martin Buser and Jeff King. Jim Baker is my favorite musher. He's a native guy who runs bigger dogs and still takes them seal hunting out on the pack ice. I was thrilled the year he won. He's a big man. Hands like hams.
Some of the Sprint guys ran a team of gsps.
janx
(24,128 posts)In a lot of respects! Ken Anderson (younger than your faves) is my favorite, but my son at one point worked for Ken and Lance Mackey when they lived side by side.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)1) Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade
2) End of an Iditarod
janx
(24,128 posts)I had to get back to work. But I saw plenty at the ceremonial start and in the middle.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I've seen the Quest a few times, skied on the track as the participants waited you leave. There are fewer places too pick up supplies and drop off dogs, fewer vet stops. It doesn't get the publicity but is quite the task.
janx
(24,128 posts)I have not had the opportunity to see it but know about it.
Stinky The Clown
(67,806 posts)There is a huge difference between "the breed" and "breeding"
Dog bred for fighting are difficult, if not impossible to rehabilitate. Euthanasia is a reasonable outcome.
The Staffordshire Bull Terrier was once called the Nanny Dog. (Since you claim to not have known that google "pit bill nanny dog".) A dog called a "Pit Bull" may or may not be one. However, people label any dog that resembles them a "pit bull" and then go on to fear, malign, and condemn any dog that looks like that. It is the canine equivalent of judging a book by its cover and is just as ignorant.
The debate in this thread will rage on, I'm sure. I'm through, however. This is a debate as closed to reason as is one of religion.
Have a really great day. Hug your dogs.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)There is no time in history that a Staffordshire Bull Terrier was called a "Nanny dog". One pitbull nutter said it in 1971 article and all the pittie nutters jumped on board.
Your denial of genetics and dog breedings and breed is staggering. Why do you think a breed tends to look alike and act alike there Hoss? It's called DNA.
Ever seen a pitbull try schutzhund? They generally suck. Why? Not bred for it.
Finally, don't hug your dogs. Most really don't like it for multiple reasons. They're just too nice to bite you.
Stinky The Clown
(67,806 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)When you make broad statements based upon a handful of anecdotal experiences and present it as truth, I'm going to call you on it.
Don't talk nonsense to someone who damned well knows better
Stinky The Clown
(67,806 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)The only violence was one saving his daddy from an attack by some wild animal in the yard that nearly killed Rooster. Bith digs were covered in blood and they bathed both. Ludo didn't have a mark on him.
But Ludo also couldn't have done the damage to his 100 lb Daddy -- whatever attacked him had sharp claws, more penetrating and thinner canines but too small to just be a feral cat, and a different set of germs... it was the infection that was the scariest part while he was recovering.
MrsMatt
(1,660 posts)I once knew someone who bred and trained them.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)But mostly the FCI dogs are still good.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)That I use for hog hunting and tracking. Great dogs, the Wiemers know when to back off and let the Rhodies take over.
Old Vet
(2,001 posts)having other dogs just don't cut it been around pit bulls a lot, They scare the hell out of me. Because you've owned other dogs doesn't give you insight on pit bulls. They have the ability to kill a human without much work for sure, Cant tell you how many times Ive seen a happy tail wagging pit bull just change fast.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)But half of all children under 2 who are killed by dogs are killed by pit bulls and Rottweilers, which are not in even a 20th of all homes with dogs.
I haven't seen statistics on this, but my guess is that almost 100% of those toddlers had one or more adults very close by who were both unable predict the attack and unable to save them once the attacks started. Another statistic I don't have handy is how many attacks total.
Parents routinely eliminate large numbers of unnecessary hazards while raising children, not because they will probably hurt them but because they could. It's appropriate to put pit bulls on the same list as pointed scissors, stacking a stool on a chair to get to the cookies, and letting children play at the bottom of the driveway where someday a driver might not see them.
Of course, it's not all children. A pit bull owned by the daughter of one of our oldest friends jumped her fence one day and killed a woman out for a walk. Such an unnecessary tragedy.
And what reason ARE we going to give for sensibly passing over pit bulls and Rottweilers as pets if not the breed? I think people arguing for these dogs should accept that people who choose against these breeds for pets are not acting out of ignorance.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,861 posts)dachshunds or poodles or chihuahuas, then maybe I'll be willing to think that pit bulls are no worse than other breeds.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)And both "pit bull mix" and "lab mix" are catch all tags that are often completely wrong but when dealing with pure bred pit bulls, the handler/owner would serve themselves and their animal to be aware of just what traits are desired and bred for in that breed. Hint: It's not submissiveness. Yes, you can have a loving and affectionate pit bull but it's breeding history has sought to strengthen aggressive traits over submissive ones and to ignore that breeding is not wise.
I believe a lot of assumptions are being made by the writer, examiner and readers of this article. Are her dogs true pit bulls or the infamous Pit Bull Mix?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)when will we learn
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)Took eight hours to gather 60 pieces of evidence. Most gruesome scene Ive ever witnessed.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)One wonders if another animal approached them during the walk or what. Something must have set off the attack, I would think.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)or the fact that her family and friends don't believe that she was killed by the dogs.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 16, 2017, 02:11 PM - Edit history (1)
I'd be interested in reading more.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)I've heard the same about other dogs who killed or attacked people-they were great and couldn't hurt a fly.
Why just recently a woman had to kill dog who attacked her and others-yet a girlfriend of dog's owner was saying how friendly this dog was.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)One of the articles I read includes a statement from a friend that it appeared to her that the dogs had forced their way out of their kennel in an attempt to get to her and protect her.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Body was found in the wooded area where she often walked these dogs. So to believe that idea, I have to believe that while she was in the wooded area dogs managed to break out of kennels and the house to get there? Also, the suggestions that dogs injured her face and hands while protecting her? How would that happen?
yewberry
(6,530 posts)The location of the kennels is unknown and her wounds could have been inflicted by a human attacker. Dogs rarely write death threats.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Kaleva
(36,307 posts)yewberry
(6,530 posts)What I am not doing is inventing details that are actually unknowns.
Kaleva
(36,307 posts)Friends and family of the deceased don't believe the dogs killed the woman because that is what they choose to believe despite the evidence to the contrary and evidence they themselves have not seen.
As for the friends, who are unnamed, who say the woman has received death threats (I may be wrong but I didn't see if any family member said the woman has received death threats), do they have first hand knowledge of such or did the deceased tell them that? Is there actual evidence of such threats?
There are too many unknowns in this story to assume any conclusion is final.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Will be a go fund me from the people pushing that nonsense.
moriah
(8,311 posts)The best evidence would be from the dogs themselves -- if they'd tried to defend her from something, they'd have injuries.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission refused to accept the multiple reoorts of a sighting of a big cat in Arkansas. Officially they aren't here, and someone finally had to shoot one to prove that even if they might not breed here, the Ozarks provide a,migration stop.
When Leigh Ann Cox was killed shortly after we moved because something was killing our chickens, and we thought it was the cat we'd reported.... she was slightly intellectually disabled but able to be by herself. When they found her mauled everyone assumed it had to have been the dogs, but there was a lot of confusion and stubbornness to admit other possibilities that kept them from gathering and preserving all evidence, including tracks, and all evidence from the dogs they'd already started shooting.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The dogs were free of her blood. Theyre more prey dogs than defensive ones, makes sense they lost their shit and turns on her. Its happened before. Not sure why people have to invent complicated scenarios to defend the dogs behavior. Where I grew up, most people trained them to be aggressive as hell to strangers, unfortunately thats part of the appeal for some owners. Its scary as hell when theyre going after you and it doesnt look like their handler can actually control them. If you grew up surrounded by that, you might feel differently.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Yes, they are defense dogs when raised right.
If she abused them, well, she got what she deserved. And there are breeds that even some people don't need to have because they've high maintenance. Some people don't need to have ANY dogs... or plants, or even pet rocks.
But if there are political reasons why it couldn't have been another animal attack, if there's DNA from a foreign source deep inside any punctures (a dog trying to revive an owner would lick wounds, but DNA in closed punctures would be more condemning of whatever animal did it)...
In Arkansas, that death investigation was botched because of interagency politics. I'm hopeful that doesn't happen here.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Dogs were blamed for a death here everyone is sure was from one of the occasional big cats that use the Ozarks and available prey there as a stopping point in eastern migrations. The Game and Fish refused to investigate the angle, claiming there were none here. They wouldn't accept trail cam footage of them either. Someone finally had to shoot one before the G&F would admit big cats didn't understand state lines.
If the police in VA have no interagency political issues affecting the investment --- ala, no Game and Fish trying to cover shit up -- hopefully they'll actually get to the bottom of it. But other animals than dogs can maul people.
And if your objection is to my view that sometimes even great people don't need some breeds of dog (like a Great Pyrenees requires about 40 acres to feel happy)and that others don't need to own dogs, or plants, or even pet rocks... what, you count yourself in that?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)trouble identifying a dog attack.
And as for "deserving" it, surely it goes way past a line that should be drawn to decide, "if it's true," that this woman probably abused the dogs and thus deserved to die? If we can sometimes overdo it once we get out teeth into something, why not dogs?
moriah
(8,311 posts)If she abused her dogs to the point they turned on her, well, sorry if this seems callous but it was the consequences of her actions. Therefore, essentially, deserved, because the animal didn't have the choice to not live with an abusive owner.
And as *my* point was about medical examiners, they sometimes make mistakes and can only examine evidence gathered.
In the death here blamed on dogs but likely not dogs for many reasons that I'm familiar with, the medical examiner wa under political pressure as I wasn't the only person in the 5-mile area surrounding the death site to report numerous sightings of some "big cat" -- it appeared to be a lynx. The G&F peeps didn't care about the tracks we'd found and the chickens that were getting killed. We moved.
Shortly after, Leigh Ann was killed. If they admitted how many sightings they refused to investigate in the area, they'd have had to admit they were potentially liable in the death, even if just in a public relations way and not legally. Nope, the dogs did it. "Impossible" for anything else to have. Evidence was lost.
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Nightmare+in+the+Ozarks%3A+they+thought+they+were+living+their+dream,...-a0113456871
I'm not suggesting that she was the victim of a homicide. I'm *wondering* if something non-canine wandered down out of its normal habitat area. The county itself is near Richmond, and averages 5 times the population density of the area we lived. But it is still not a very populated county in comparison to Richmond. And very recently we had something attack a friend's 100 lb dog and shred his muzzle, make multiple bite punctures top deep to be a feral domestic cat but too thin to be the other dog in the backyard etc, within the Little Rock city limits. Nearly killed him and would have if there hadn't been two dogs to fight off whatever it was. And G&F didn't care about the vet's conclusion that it was something that shouldn't be in a city.
Hopefully Virginia doesn't have those same issues in death investigations.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)They don't do it for no reason.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)"Those dogs loved her as much as she loved them"
That diingbat has no idea what happened or what any of the injuries look like but she just "knows" it wasn't the dogs.
womanofthehills
(8,712 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)They fit the muzzle and around the head. they are actually more humane than a collar or harness. It works off the same idea that works for horses. lead the head and it will follow. A collar can choke a dog and most people have absolutely no clue how to properly use them. Harnesses make the dog feel trapped and restrained. When in use it lays lightly on the muzzle and slightly snugged behind the head and the leash is supposed to be held loosely. It does take training however but works better. I suspect the way the dog is resting it's head that the halter appears to be tight but will loosen when he moves away. I think it's eyes are closed because the dog is relaxed.
womanofthehills
(8,712 posts)Also, she's not walking the dog so it looks cruel to me. Maybe the dogs eyes are closed in resignation.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)Muzzles are typically thicker and stronger. They also go further up the muzzle so they can not open their mouth at all and the position of this head halter would not prevent the dog from biting. Head halters allow dogs to open their mouth. You can feed them a treat with it on and give water to them or pant if needed. To walk a dog with a head halter there is more freedom for the dog and you do not hold it taught at all. The dog needs to be trained to heal. The fact that most people do not know how to properly use a choke chain makes them very cruel. People tend to have chokers tight and they are supposed to be slack and when correcting a bad behavior you do not pull back you make a small quick yank with your wrist to get their attention. The choker needs to be put on properly and most people do not know that. The head halter is no more cruel for a dog than a halter for a horse. When you lead a horse and know how to do it and the horse is trained well you leave the lead rope slack not taught.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)What a strange and sad story.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)So that doesn't surprise me.
I hope police investigates, obviously, but if she was out walking these two huge dogs, I find it hard to believe somebody could have gotten to attack her.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Simply put, not all dogs are 'that way', not even the dreaded Pit Bull.
Also, if they were on leashes, and there were two or more human attackers with a serious plan in mind to harm her, one of the attackers could've gotten/held the leashes while the accomplice(s) attacked her.
Not at all saying that's LIKELY, but the mere presence of two big dogs doesn't by necessity mean she had 100% certain protection against human assailants.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)And I think it's pretty obvious that whatever killed her wasn't human.
They already have initial results from medical examiner indicating it was consistent with a dog attack-which is posted right there in the OP. So I think it's already clear he wasn't killed by a human.
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)Like some people.
I had a beautiful, smart dog, part lab - part rottweiler. Out of nowhere he attacked my ewes. They were older girls easily 150 pounds that took good care of their lambs. They were on the farm long before we brought the puppy home with his sister. His mom was a gentle creature though no one is sure about the father.
After living peacefully for 5 years with these sheep, he dug his way through a woven wire fence into a field he was never allowed into. He had killed chickens and small wildlife before but that is not uncommon for farm dogs that are pets. Unfortunately this time the LSG dog was with some younger sheep in another field, or she would have never allowed him into the field. He attacked the lead ewe and tore her to pieces. I was out shopping so no one stopped him. He ripped out her throat, tore off her leg, ears and punctured her lung. About the time he was starting on the other ewes, someone saw and chased him off. I came home to a massacre scene. I had to put the lead ewe down, she was still alive. Two other ewes are recovering from their wounds.
I took him to animal control and explained what he had done. They think they can find a home for him with someone in the city who doesn't have livestock. I warned them they had to tell his new owners about his blood lust. I still worry that he may move on to attacking people or at least hurting people when he is trying to get to his animal victims.
This dog is slightly fat with a shiny black coat because he never missed a meal, ever. He was loved and trained. When I said no, he would stop in mid stride. I really loved him and wanted desperately to keep him. But I could never trust him again and he tends to escape now and then (I would immediately hunt him out and bring him home). All the horses, cattle and sheep around us were in danger too.
I never had a dog do something like this. I always thought it was the owner's fault for not training them. I thought of him as family and someone said to me you don't give family members away. I say you do when they start murdering other family members... or at least you take them to the police...or animal control.
Sometimes dogs just can't help their natural animal nature, no matter how much training you give them.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Like those pitbulls and something triggers that pretty drive. Then they go off.
Animal control sucks. I'm sorry but that dog should be euthanized. He likes to hunt and kill smaller animals. What happens when he does not recognize a toddler in a snowsuit as a human?
He could go to the right person, but I fear they are dismissing this behavior, and probably not being discriminating enough.
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)They said he shouldn't be put down, since he was never aggressive towards people. They gave me my money back.
My wife probobly convinced them. After I filled out the paperwork she brings him in. They see this little gray haired lady lead this big dog that's acting like a shy puppy and they think they can find him a home. She was the one who did a lot of the training. She knows how to handle animals. She was also the one who took care of the ewes with their new lambs. They didn't see the results of the massacre but she did.
They said they were going to bring in an expert to evaluate him and see if he was a risk to people. I hope that person knows what they are doing.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)when I was young and stupid. Sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night realizing our 5-year-old son came within a second of being killed by a large dog. We were walking home from kindergarten and he'd dropped behind when I turned and saw a large, lean gray dog running full-out straight for him in the street. Silently, as Drauthaardogs described. The owner at the screen door he'd presumably slipped past called him and he stopped with excellent discipline perhaps a yard short of my little son and returned straight to his owner. I was running back waving his papers, but I couldn't have saved him.
The thing was, because I was young and ignorant and the dog was so silent and well trained, I really didn't know what to think -- was the dog going to stop and lick him? Until I saw that the owner was shook. We just looked at each other, he closed the door behind them and I continued on, sort of assuming he'd be more careful.
What makes me very ashamed now is that even then I didn't really comprehend that the dog was about to kill our five-year-old right then like a rabbit, not just bite. How stupid and irresponsible could I be! As a result, I didn't take immediate steps to have that dog removed from a residential neighborhood full of children -- our children! -- and people out for strolls. Today I'd be on the phone before I dropped my purse.
Btw, I'd never seen that dog before and never saw him again, so perhaps at least the owner was more responsible than this suggests. For sure I know now that he understood that a child would have died had he been a second slower.
renate
(13,776 posts)I'm so sorry about your ewes, and about the pain and disappointment you must have felt with your beloved dog, and I really admire you for your willingness to do the right and difficult thing with him.
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)But as my better half says, you got to do what you got to do.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)But TN has some new strict animal cruelty laws. One of those laws will put you on a registry if you are found to have killed dogs or cats for no apparent reason. I'm sure they are trying to identify future serial murderers. But I figured better be upfront about it and not risk the possibility.
underpants
(182,823 posts)This doesn't make sense to me but the Sheriff seems to be pretty sure about it.
I just find it unlikely that the dogs would just turn on her.
I've read every link here but I don't see what the death threats were about. Since she had a Glen Allen address but was living back near where she grew up in Goochland I'd guess it was from a relationship gone bad. ????
Let's see what the final report says.
janx
(24,128 posts)It could have been that they got into a fight, the woman tried to break it up and then became part of it. Dog fights are gruesome, quite out of control. Few things are more terrifying than a dog fight.
underpants
(182,823 posts)From the links her friends are questioning the Sheriff's conclusion saying the dogs slept in bed with her.
I will say that I was surprised by a few things.
1. I would have expected the Sheriff of Goochland to be more of a good old boy type but the population there has changed given the continued spreading out of the burbs around here.
2. Speaking of appearances - was his statement about these being dogs "bred to fight" based just on their size/their behavior or did they check her residence for the normal signs of dog fighting training?
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Large, dominant dogs DO NOT belong in bed with you. The message it sends is not a good one. Owning aggressive dogs is COMPLETELY different and I just can't say that enough
underpants
(182,823 posts)misanthrope
(7,417 posts)Dogs have been genetically modified through artificial selection in myriad ways chimpanzees haven't.
janx
(24,128 posts)A couple of my dogs have slept in bed with me, but I would not recommend that. One of them got pissed off at the children when they approached.
One I had later started trouble with the other dog in the bed. Sleeping with dogs lowers you to their level and to an extent can ruin the relationship you should have with them as their leader. There's nothing quite as peaceful as sleeping with a dog on a cold winter night, but it can cause problems in the "pack."
As for the sheriff, my guess is that he saw the pits as fighting dogs based on their appearance. In the past, I've always defended pits like many dog lovers, but there are acquired characteristics that can be passed down and set off. Breeders of all kinds of animals know this. There is current research in the field of genetics that verifies it more than ever now.
underpants
(182,823 posts)Back in 2009 - WOW was it really that long ago?
Carla Nash was the woman who got attacked and got the "face transplant"
Travis the chimp
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travis_(chimpanzee)
janx
(24,128 posts)It's a cruel thing to do.
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)They were great with babies
We never expected this
On and freaking on!
Laffy Kat
(16,382 posts)No one deserves it, just pointing out it could have been a lot worse. It is very odd.
Doodley
(9,092 posts)milestogo
(16,829 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)...as that is a real threat to a survival!
marble falls
(57,097 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Colobo was my name here!
marble falls
(57,097 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)I am saddened to see the lack of love for pittes around here, but at least everyone here shares my despair regarding the Trump regime!
marble falls
(57,097 posts)Response to Doodley (Reply #87)
Post removed
nolabear
(41,984 posts)Theres a whole lot of backstory there that we dont know. Im very sorry about what happened. But they were playing with fire on more than one front, it seems.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)You don't treat them like it appears she did, sleeping w/them and such.
womanofthehills
(8,712 posts)with a leash wrapped around his mouth.
janx
(24,128 posts)Will you be kind and elaborate?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)womanofthehills
(8,712 posts)If you have control of your dog and he knows who is boss, he won't pull.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)I feel there's more to this story, but very sad anyway. We own 3 pittie mixes, and they are the life of our home and very peaceful, loving creatures, so it's horrible to read news like this.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Is that you Doc?
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 16, 2017, 05:08 PM - Edit history (1)
About 10 years ago, I was Katzenkavalier and Colobo. I stopped posting around 2009, but remained a lurker. Since Trump "won", I have been wanting to post again, and I guess the thread inspired me to join again. Glad to be back, though!
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)I do not trust Pitts. There is something about
the breed, I can't put it into words exactly.
I would never own one for any reason.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)I find them vicious!
doc03
(35,340 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)No need to fight here. Like my pitties, I am all about making friends and having a good time. Enjoy your Saturday!
Doreen
(11,686 posts)years in animal shelters I discovered that small dogs are "more likely" to bite. The issue is that big dogs can cause more damage not that they are more vicious. I would rather groom pitties than a poodle.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)The problem is when something triggers that pitbull into prey drive. That is probably not going to happen at the groomers
Doreen
(11,686 posts)Anything can trigger any dog of any breed. Oh, believe me after 11 and a half years of dog grooming there are happenings. I have found in my years that small dogs defiantly bite more than big dogs. People just do not seem report it because, One: less damage or even a lot simply because they are small and usually do not cause as much damage even though there is some. Two: It is assumed if a small dog bites it because you did something to scare it or hurt it and you probably deserved it.
I met a lady years ago who told me that a friends daughter was at her mothers with her two year old boy and he was sitting in a corner playing with his toys and not being noisy either. The mother let her poodle in from outside and the dog made a beeline to the child and tore his face. He had not even noticed the dog and had made no sudden movements when the dog came in. Now, that is exactly what Pit Bulls get blamed for. The poodle was not reported like a Pit Bull would be.
erinlough
(2,176 posts)An old farm story. We had a house dog, a mutt, sweet and gentle. She wasnt interested in hurting anything. She regularly let kittens crawl all over her. One day a stray came by and she followed it over to the neighbors chickens. The neighbor said there was no stopping them. They killed every chicken. We found their carcasses hidden in her bed in the barn. Once
Pack behavior shifts its instinctual.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)Yes, it's a tragedy, but please, there's enough bad political news without having to see this kind of this on DU.
janx
(24,128 posts)Last edited Sun Dec 17, 2017, 07:57 PM - Edit history (1)
The relationship between humans and other animals is political in the human world.
Mariana
(14,857 posts)Discuss politics, issues, and current events.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)And he was locked in a car in a bad part of town. The dozens of other pits I've met have been nice and laid back. They could inflict serious damage I'm sure. I just haven't seen that the majority of them have the propensity to do so.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)the mother tended to stay on the porch and do nothing while her 4 pups ( full grown ) would surround the car and the moment the car door opened they all flopped onto their back and you could not get out without going through the routine tummy rubs. Dangerous tummies.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)One was the mother, the other her son. Their names were Money and Cash. Whenever I saw them coming into the park, I would yell out "Hey Cash!". He would be so happy and surprised that someone knew him he'd gallop down to get petted. Of course, Cash was not allowed to play with my dog...because he was twice her weight but thought he was Chihuahua sized.
Once, my other dog got into a "fight" with Money. He's the type of dog who polices the other dogs at the park. Money and Cash had been wrestling, and my dog didn't like it. So, my little 40 lb dog ran up to the two 110 lb pits and barked at them to stop. Cash ran away in terror, but Money stood her ground. After much intense barking, they were separated. No bites, nothing. It was all for show. The funniest thing was that Cash had run and was cowering by the fence.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)I have seen dogs of all breeds going through that through out my life of working with or just being with dogs.
Embarrassingly the German Shepherd I had was scared of small dogs. I went to a day care for him and they put him in with a whole bunch of small dogs and they all started to herd him in circles around the pen. He looked so pitiful. We put him in with the large dogs and he was happy. When I got back they said he was the best German Shepherd they had ever had. I think the fact he was my service dog helped a lot.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Some dogs are raised well and are good. Others are poorly raised and are bad. I have been attacked by cats several times and I don't hate them.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)I do not like small dogs very well but do not hate them. I have been owned by small dogs and they were just fine.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)A few months ago I argued in a thread that dachshunds are the worst dogs for biting. Everyone jumped on me because a little dachshund couldn't do much damage. I say that is bs. What's more, it goes to show that a lot of people are not that interested in how the owners train their dogs. It's like they are saying it's ok if a small dog is vicious because it cannot inflict a lot of damage, but a big dog should not be tolerated because it can inflict damage. I want to scream, LOOK AT THE OWNERS!
Doreen
(11,686 posts)I can not say how many times I came close to losing a finger/hand/nose to a damn poodle. I must say my Chihuahua was not the greatest when it came to being nice to other people ( particularly children. ) Dachshunds can be bad also.
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Response to oberliner (Original post)
Post removed
janx
(24,128 posts)You might want to read carefully and think about that.
I speak as one who respects you and who has corresponded with you before.
flvegan
(64,408 posts)Enlighten me.
Throck
(2,520 posts)9 lives matter.
CountAllVotes
(20,875 posts)*ditto*
RobinA
(9,893 posts)Im sitting here reading this with my cat sleeping on my lap. Her death toll is considerable but limited to rodents.
CountAllVotes
(20,875 posts)Agnew said he didn't have a history on the animals but said they were "big, strong, powerful dogs" that "you would suspect were bred for fighting, just in looking at them."
*****
And yes they are pursuing euthanization which is likely a very good idea considering the fact that they suspect these dogs were bred and seemingly used to fight and of course what occurred which was dreadful at best. Dogs such as this know no other way in life and it is dangerous having these animals around anything that breathes it seems to me. As for the person(s) that trained these dogs to do what they have done is frightening and horrific.
As for pitbulls, I've never cared for these dogs. I knew a guy that had one that he named "Chopper" and for a reason. I suspected that that dog was used in fights as well. Why can't people think of good ways to use dogs like this other than to fight and kill? I just don't get it.
Sad way to go being killed by your own pack of dogs that are obviously not so very "loving" so to speak.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Add me to the later group.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Just google the topic and see what come up.
https://www.google.com/search?q=family+pitbull+attacks&oq=family+pitbull+attacks&aqs=chrome..69i57.13859j0j4&client=ms-android-verizon&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
IMO, they can have moments where they lose control and they are very dangerous when they do.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)She's the ones that goes off on my pit-lab mix and has serious attitude issues. She doesn't have a drop of pit in her.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)Im talking about a real fighting dog used in big money contests. They are way, way too expensive for trailer trash to ever own.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I can see dogs for protection, but not for fighting other dogs while sick slobs bet on the winner.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Those who abuse and torture them for profit are sick and should be seen as menaces to society.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)Most of the world is not the USA although the ultimate fighting dog, the APBT, was perfected here. Dog fighting is perfectly legal in many countries and tolerated in many others who have laws against it on the books.
It's a rich man's game basically because you have to have large numbers of dogs to produce even one real world class winner. In America, dog fighters are almost always wealthy and Republican.
What is commonly referred to as a "pit bull" which the public is allowed to see is usually a scatter bred creature with some real APBT mixed in somewhere. Along with Am Staff, boxer and who-knows-what. Most are good dogs.
The majority of dogs used for fighting rarely weigh over 50 lbs and love people.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Maybe the people training dogs to fight should get in the ring and fight to the death instead. I really don't care that most dogfight fans are republican, the pratice of having dogs fight is barbaric.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)Desire for fighting contact regardless of outcome is the breeding model.
BTW, I am no fan of this.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)I'll just leave it at that.