Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IronLionZion

(45,446 posts)
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 10:52 AM Dec 2017

Female congressional candidate leaves race after sexual harassment allegations resurface

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/12/15/female-congressional-candidate-leaves-race-after-sexual-harassment-allegations-resurface/



Andrea Ramsey had been running as a Democrat for a congressional seat in Kansas. (YouTube/Nick Decaro)

A Democratic candidate hoping to flip a hotly contested congressional seat in Kansas has dropped out of the race after allegations that she sexually harassed a male subordinate resurfaced during her campaign.

Andrea Ramsey, 57, who was running to unseat Republican Kevin Yoder in a district that includes Kansas City in 2018, is one of the few, if only, women in public life to step down thus far amid a national conversation about sex and power dynamics in the workplace. The vast majority of those accused of sexual misconduct have been men in public-facing industrieDCCC spokeswoman Meredith Kelly said that the organization had not been involved in the primary, financially or otherwise.

“Members and candidates must all be held to the highest standard,” Kelly said in an emailed statement. “If anyone is guilty of sexual harassment or sexual assault, that person should not hold public office.”s like media, Hollywood and politics.

In a defiant letter posted on Facebook Friday, Ramsey defended herself from the charges made by a former subordinate years ago and blamed her decision on the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the campaign arm of Democrats in the House. Ramsey said that the DCCC had decided “not to support our promising campaign.”
ry, financially or otherwise.

“Members and candidates must all be held to the highest standard,” Kelly said in an emailed statement. “If anyone is guilty of sexual harassment or sexual assault, that person should not hold public office.”


We finally got a woman! This is a win for feminism and the #MeToo movement.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

delisen

(6,043 posts)
1. Republicans see an opportunity in Dems Zero Tolerance stance.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 11:23 AM
Dec 2017

So many Democrats who see the evil of zero-tolerance in the criminal justice system rush to adopt a similar standard for elective office.

The Ironies of Injustice.

If I were a Roger Stone Republican I would seize the opportunity to arrange false and frivolous claims against Democrats and I aim my fire at the strongest Democratic candidates.

The new standard of the DCCC seems to be:

If a democratic candidate is accused of sexual harassment, whether guilty or innocent, that candidate cannot run for office.
 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
2. Yeah, who could've predicted that treating an accusation as solid evidence of guilt
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 11:58 AM
Dec 2017

could be misused? Well, the Democrats have set the precedent now. Let the whispers and the resulting purges begin. Republicans are delighted and are sure to help in any way they can.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
3. This is also a two tier attack, using the EEOC as a weapon.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 12:15 PM
Dec 2017

These fucking ratfuckers are really good at this shit.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
7. No, that's not accurate.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 01:50 PM
Dec 2017

EEOC investigated and declined to bring charges. The guy supposedly settled with the company he sued after EEOC declined to bring any charges.

"The EEOC closed its investigation in 2005, saying that it was “unable to conclude that the information obtained establishes violations of the statutes.” Though Ramsey was not charged directly in the lawsuit, she had been named in the complaint. It was settled by the company after mediation in 2006 and had begun to be discussed in political circles recently, the Star reported."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/12/15/female-congressional-candidate-leaves-race-after-sexual-harassment-allegations-resurface/?utm_term=.9e8a9767a996

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
8. Fair point, but the "dismissal" led to the lawsuit.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 01:58 PM
Dec 2017
"This does not certify that the respondent is in compliance with the statutes. No finding is made as to any other issues that might be construed as having been raised by this charge."


It wasn't like the EEOC said "you don't have a case here." The "dismissal" literally comes with a right to sue paper.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
9. EEOC closed the investigation without being able to reach any conclusions regarding any violations.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 02:07 PM
Dec 2017

The guy sued the company itself, not the woman in question. She had not input on whether to settle or not.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
5. It sure seems like the standard. If one is ever accused, no matter how flimsy accusations are,
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 01:25 PM
Dec 2017

an accused either can not run for office or supposed to resign if already elected. And then DCCC spokesperson says if someone is guilty they can not hold public office. Who decides if someone is guilty?
In this particular case, this woman wasn't found guilty of anything, EEOC investigated and declined to bring charges.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Female congressional cand...