Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSeth Abramson thread: Instructions for a Constitutional Crisis
Long thread starting here:
Link to tweet
(THREAD) There's now a rumor in Congress that Trump plans to fire Special Counsel Mueller on December 22. If this happens, it will trigger a constitutional crisis. This thread explains what's happening and what to doplease read and share it widely. This is an actual emergency.
1/ Trump cannot legally fire Bob Mueller. First, because that authority resides exclusively with Acting Attorney General Rosenstein; second, because even as head of the Executive Branch, Trump cannot exert his power for a criminal purpose. Firing Bob Mueller would be Obstruction.
2/ Mueller has seen all the evidence against Trump and his associates; the public has seen only a fraction of it. I can sayas a former criminal attorney and investigator researching this case since 2016no exculpatory evidence has been found. All evidence points toward guilt.
3/ Further confirmation of this is that we don't hear from the media or Congressional Republicans any evidenceeven claimsthat Trump and his associates are innocent. We hear nothing but scurrilous attacks against the investigators. This is what people who know they're caught do.
4/ For these reasonsand because Trump can't legally fire Muelleryou should assume the Special Counsel will refuse to be fired directly by Trump if Trump attempts to do this. Instead, he will issue a statement saying that authority to end his investigation lies with Rosenstein.
5/ Rosenstein just made clear, via Congressional testimony, that he won't fire Mueller without cause, and presently sees no cause to do so. What this means is that Trump would have to fire Rosenstein in order to rid himself of Mueller. But Trump may elect more dangerous options.
6/ Trump knows firing Rosenstein and ordering Rachel Brand (next up at DOJ) to fire Mueller is a fool's errand: first, because Brand would likely refuse, as Mueller has done nothing to warrant being fired; second, because she's read history booksshe knows this is Nixonian graft.
7/ While Trump could eventually find someone at DOJ to fire Muellerhe can just keep firing attorneys until he gets a stooge to do his bidding as the late Robert Bork did for Nixonhe could also seek recourse in an executive order he issued that arguably lets him name his own AG.
8/ Or, he could select the most dangerous optionone Nixon himself executed once Cox was gone. That would be declaring himself able to fire Mueller and then sending federal law enforcement officers to remove Bob Mueller and his agents from their office and lock down the premises.
9/ If Trump chooses Option Afiring everyone until he finds a stoogeit'll take many days and many firings and be a fiasco; Option B (using his own executive order) is substantially easier; whereas Option C could lead to some harrowing televised scenes of forcible federal action.
10/ Mueller is a good man; his whole his biography confirms it. He could acquiesce to being fired to avoid a fracture in the rule of law; he could seek a court injunction to prevent his firing; he could contact Congressional allies and pray a bill is passed to prevent his firing.
11/ Here's what we know: Trump doesn't have the power to fire Mueller, and Rosenstein won't do it. Trump arguably has the power to install an AG who will fire Mueller and Congress arguably has the power to pass a bill to stop it. Mueller will try to protect America's rule of law.
12/ One other thing is clear: Congressional Republicans lack the willor, in the House, the interestto stand up to Trump should he overturn the rule of law. That said, Democrats would only need a small number of Republican allies in the two houses of Congress to protect Mueller.
13/ Trump is guilty of everything people believe him guilty of; all the evidence establishes it. So we must predict his actions with that in mind. This is a man who conspired with the Russians to steal an election, and now holds the reins of power at the seat of power he stole.
14/ The rumors over the past few days are that Kushner may soon be indicted; certainly, Mueller asking Kushner to answer questions on what Flynn said to him at a time Mueller knewbut Kushner didn'tFlynn was cooperating suggests Mueller has gotten Kushner to incriminate himself.
15/ The point is that Trump believesrightly or notthis investigation is about to reach another of his right-hand men (two are already charged), this one a family member. And Trump knows he is guilty. And he's not emotionally well. So it's not clear what Trump is willing to do.
16/ The best-case scenario here: Trump keeps firing people at the DOJall of whom refuse to do his illegal biddinguntil he runs out of political capital in Congress. The worst-case scenario: Trump uses federal agents to physically remove Mueller and his team from their offices.
17/ The second best-case scenario: this ends up in the courtseventually SCOTUSwhere we can assume (or at least pray) rule of law will prevail. The second worst-case scenario: Trump installs his own AG, who then fires Mueller, ending actual (but preserving apparent) rule of law.
18/ The middle-case scenarios are harder to seebut involve tepid Congressional action to move the probe forward with a new Trump-friendly Special Counsel, leading to a scam investigation; or, Congress ends the probe and creates its own political probe to (sort-of) "investigate
19/ Understand that *all* of these scenarios *except* the unfettered continuation of the Mueller probe are a significant blow against the rule of law in America, to the point that Trump becomes as much a monarch as a presidentin actuality above the normal operation of our laws.
20/ Any American who thinks there's even a 1% chance Trump conspired with our foes should want that 1% possibility 100% investigated. The only reason to want the Mueller probe ended entirely is because you want Donald Trump to reign over America as a king rather than a president.
21/ What all this means is that if Trump takes *any* action against Mueller, our rule of law is *gravely* threatened. Even if you think Mueller's work needs careful oversight, there's already a *Trump appointee*Rosensteinwho's doing that and certifies the probe has been honest.
22/ So all Americans, no matter their political stripe or what chance you think there is that Trump is guilty1% or 90%should do what Americans did during the Watergate Era if Trump fires Mueller: take to the streets and swarm Congress' phone lines until rule of law is restored.
23/ If this happens, you can expect peaceful disruptions in American life for *some time*. Mass protests that block highways and buildings and shut down parts of cities; mass walkouts from jobs and schools; a media atmosphere in which only one storythis onecan be or is covered.
24/ The key here is that the protests must not and cannot stop until rule of law is restored: a Mueller investigation, overseen (as now) by Trump appointee Rosenstein, which has unfettered access to evidence and witnesses in an effort to find the truthand justicefor Americans.
PS/ Other things to keep in mind: Mueller *could* speed up his indictments, and/or agents of his could (presumably without his approval) leak inculpatory evidence about Trump and his associates, in an effort to underscore the legitimacy ofand seek to protecttheir investigation.
PS2/ Democrats (perhaps even with a few GOP allies) could go into a "lockdown scenario" in which they use every procedural measure at their disposal to shut down all operations of governmentexcept emergency operationsuntil such time as Congress passes a bill protecting Mueller.
PS3/ American and international media could begin reporting, in real time, Americans' dramatic and quickly changing reactions to Trump's actionswhich would be critical because firing Mueller would *almost certainly* drop Trump's approval ratings into the mid- (or even low) 20s.
PS4/ Trump's ability to appear in public for rallies or other public events may be severely curtailed due to the protests; reporters would be likely to shout questions at him during any public appearance. His presidency would be paralyzedin Congress, in public, and in the media.
PS5/ Because firing Mueller would shake the foundations of American law and democracy to their core, we would expect *dramatic* market volatility for the entirety of the crisis. Likewise, we would expect a leaky White House and Congress to go from "leaky" to a veritable *deluge*.
SOURCES/ If you still need evidence of collusion, here it is. But as you read it, remember: (1) this is a *fraction* of the evidence Mueller has; (2) this only needs to make you 1% fearful Trump is guiltyas that's enough to 100% support an investigation.
1/ Trump cannot legally fire Bob Mueller. First, because that authority resides exclusively with Acting Attorney General Rosenstein; second, because even as head of the Executive Branch, Trump cannot exert his power for a criminal purpose. Firing Bob Mueller would be Obstruction.
2/ Mueller has seen all the evidence against Trump and his associates; the public has seen only a fraction of it. I can sayas a former criminal attorney and investigator researching this case since 2016no exculpatory evidence has been found. All evidence points toward guilt.
3/ Further confirmation of this is that we don't hear from the media or Congressional Republicans any evidenceeven claimsthat Trump and his associates are innocent. We hear nothing but scurrilous attacks against the investigators. This is what people who know they're caught do.
4/ For these reasonsand because Trump can't legally fire Muelleryou should assume the Special Counsel will refuse to be fired directly by Trump if Trump attempts to do this. Instead, he will issue a statement saying that authority to end his investigation lies with Rosenstein.
5/ Rosenstein just made clear, via Congressional testimony, that he won't fire Mueller without cause, and presently sees no cause to do so. What this means is that Trump would have to fire Rosenstein in order to rid himself of Mueller. But Trump may elect more dangerous options.
6/ Trump knows firing Rosenstein and ordering Rachel Brand (next up at DOJ) to fire Mueller is a fool's errand: first, because Brand would likely refuse, as Mueller has done nothing to warrant being fired; second, because she's read history booksshe knows this is Nixonian graft.
7/ While Trump could eventually find someone at DOJ to fire Muellerhe can just keep firing attorneys until he gets a stooge to do his bidding as the late Robert Bork did for Nixonhe could also seek recourse in an executive order he issued that arguably lets him name his own AG.
8/ Or, he could select the most dangerous optionone Nixon himself executed once Cox was gone. That would be declaring himself able to fire Mueller and then sending federal law enforcement officers to remove Bob Mueller and his agents from their office and lock down the premises.
9/ If Trump chooses Option Afiring everyone until he finds a stoogeit'll take many days and many firings and be a fiasco; Option B (using his own executive order) is substantially easier; whereas Option C could lead to some harrowing televised scenes of forcible federal action.
10/ Mueller is a good man; his whole his biography confirms it. He could acquiesce to being fired to avoid a fracture in the rule of law; he could seek a court injunction to prevent his firing; he could contact Congressional allies and pray a bill is passed to prevent his firing.
11/ Here's what we know: Trump doesn't have the power to fire Mueller, and Rosenstein won't do it. Trump arguably has the power to install an AG who will fire Mueller and Congress arguably has the power to pass a bill to stop it. Mueller will try to protect America's rule of law.
12/ One other thing is clear: Congressional Republicans lack the willor, in the House, the interestto stand up to Trump should he overturn the rule of law. That said, Democrats would only need a small number of Republican allies in the two houses of Congress to protect Mueller.
13/ Trump is guilty of everything people believe him guilty of; all the evidence establishes it. So we must predict his actions with that in mind. This is a man who conspired with the Russians to steal an election, and now holds the reins of power at the seat of power he stole.
14/ The rumors over the past few days are that Kushner may soon be indicted; certainly, Mueller asking Kushner to answer questions on what Flynn said to him at a time Mueller knewbut Kushner didn'tFlynn was cooperating suggests Mueller has gotten Kushner to incriminate himself.
15/ The point is that Trump believesrightly or notthis investigation is about to reach another of his right-hand men (two are already charged), this one a family member. And Trump knows he is guilty. And he's not emotionally well. So it's not clear what Trump is willing to do.
16/ The best-case scenario here: Trump keeps firing people at the DOJall of whom refuse to do his illegal biddinguntil he runs out of political capital in Congress. The worst-case scenario: Trump uses federal agents to physically remove Mueller and his team from their offices.
17/ The second best-case scenario: this ends up in the courtseventually SCOTUSwhere we can assume (or at least pray) rule of law will prevail. The second worst-case scenario: Trump installs his own AG, who then fires Mueller, ending actual (but preserving apparent) rule of law.
18/ The middle-case scenarios are harder to seebut involve tepid Congressional action to move the probe forward with a new Trump-friendly Special Counsel, leading to a scam investigation; or, Congress ends the probe and creates its own political probe to (sort-of) "investigate
19/ Understand that *all* of these scenarios *except* the unfettered continuation of the Mueller probe are a significant blow against the rule of law in America, to the point that Trump becomes as much a monarch as a presidentin actuality above the normal operation of our laws.
20/ Any American who thinks there's even a 1% chance Trump conspired with our foes should want that 1% possibility 100% investigated. The only reason to want the Mueller probe ended entirely is because you want Donald Trump to reign over America as a king rather than a president.
21/ What all this means is that if Trump takes *any* action against Mueller, our rule of law is *gravely* threatened. Even if you think Mueller's work needs careful oversight, there's already a *Trump appointee*Rosensteinwho's doing that and certifies the probe has been honest.
22/ So all Americans, no matter their political stripe or what chance you think there is that Trump is guilty1% or 90%should do what Americans did during the Watergate Era if Trump fires Mueller: take to the streets and swarm Congress' phone lines until rule of law is restored.
23/ If this happens, you can expect peaceful disruptions in American life for *some time*. Mass protests that block highways and buildings and shut down parts of cities; mass walkouts from jobs and schools; a media atmosphere in which only one storythis onecan be or is covered.
24/ The key here is that the protests must not and cannot stop until rule of law is restored: a Mueller investigation, overseen (as now) by Trump appointee Rosenstein, which has unfettered access to evidence and witnesses in an effort to find the truthand justicefor Americans.
PS/ Other things to keep in mind: Mueller *could* speed up his indictments, and/or agents of his could (presumably without his approval) leak inculpatory evidence about Trump and his associates, in an effort to underscore the legitimacy ofand seek to protecttheir investigation.
PS2/ Democrats (perhaps even with a few GOP allies) could go into a "lockdown scenario" in which they use every procedural measure at their disposal to shut down all operations of governmentexcept emergency operationsuntil such time as Congress passes a bill protecting Mueller.
PS3/ American and international media could begin reporting, in real time, Americans' dramatic and quickly changing reactions to Trump's actionswhich would be critical because firing Mueller would *almost certainly* drop Trump's approval ratings into the mid- (or even low) 20s.
PS4/ Trump's ability to appear in public for rallies or other public events may be severely curtailed due to the protests; reporters would be likely to shout questions at him during any public appearance. His presidency would be paralyzedin Congress, in public, and in the media.
PS5/ Because firing Mueller would shake the foundations of American law and democracy to their core, we would expect *dramatic* market volatility for the entirety of the crisis. Likewise, we would expect a leaky White House and Congress to go from "leaky" to a veritable *deluge*.
SOURCES/ If you still need evidence of collusion, here it is. But as you read it, remember: (1) this is a *fraction* of the evidence Mueller has; (2) this only needs to make you 1% fearful Trump is guiltyas that's enough to 100% support an investigation.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 3620 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seth Abramson thread: Instructions for a Constitutional Crisis (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Dec 2017
OP
He's have to declare martial law to do that, and I don't think enough people would follow his orders
highplainsdem
Dec 2017
#2
pangaia
(24,324 posts)1. Thank YOU for posting this..
Can I ask a probably dumb question..
Another scenario..What if 'trump' just starts having people arrested -- investigators, lawyers, reporters, democratic politicians, protesters, ???
Assuming the cops or whomever follow orders??
highplainsdem
(49,022 posts)2. He's have to declare martial law to do that, and I don't think enough people would follow his orders
pangaia
(24,324 posts)3. Humm... thank you....
You know,, somewhere... I can see a good possibility of that coming to pass...
KelleyKramer
(8,981 posts)4. Kick! Because this is important
canetoad
(17,175 posts)5. K&R Seth Abramson is always worth reading
15/ The point is that Trump believesrightly or notthis investigation is about to reach another of his right-hand men (two are already charged), this one a family member. And Trump knows he is guilty. And he's not emotionally well. So it's not clear what Trump is willing to do.
Interests me too. Trump would throw Jared under the bus without a moments thought, if it meant some advantage to himself. Would he do that, and what are the consequences?