Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 08:09 PM Dec 2017

$179Billion in Medicaid cuts in the "Tax Cut" bill

Just saw on MSNBC a clip of Claire McCaskill giving Orin Hatch a hard time because, as she read from the CBO report, part of the tax cut bill is being funded by a REDUCTION in Medicaid of $179 Billion. That's a HUGE amount of money. That's more than double what the GOP Health care bill cut from Medicaid.

She also noted that other money is coming from people who earn less than $50,000 a year.

Wow. Just wow. Just to go to the very rich.

I've never seen such a cruel, in-your-face giveaway to the rich. This is historical.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$179Billion in Medicaid cuts in the "Tax Cut" bill (Original Post) Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 OP
More like "that's the effect given a particular cause." Igel Dec 2017 #1
She said it was a reduction in spending. The health care bill WAS, in fact, a reduction in spending. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #16
I worked in Mental health for many many years. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2017 #20
And it was probably all Orrin could do to avoid giving the "they wasted their money" speech again. Ken Burch Dec 2017 #2
It will destroy rural clinics and hospitals. roamer65 Dec 2017 #3
Kiss all those small town critical access hospital's goodbye and enjoy your stupid vote for trump elehhhhna Dec 2017 #13
ERs will be over loaded. Iliyah Dec 2017 #4
People will die. That is the point. Old people and sick children are useless eaters. Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #6
The corporations and the wealthy buy the politicians so what do we expect? jalan48 Dec 2017 #5
According to Republicans, asking the wealthy to pay their fair share is the all dreaded, and to be -Steph- Dec 2017 #7
How can that ever be OK BittyJenkins Dec 2017 #8
The GOP wants to punish the people who did not vote for them, plainly political abuse of power, ... L. Coyote Dec 2017 #9
But a very great many people who will be affected by the Medicaid cuts DID vote for the pukes Glorfindel Dec 2017 #11
My nursing home my mother lived in had young people living there. Demtexan Dec 2017 #12
Yes. I think some don't realize that. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #17
The 22 year old was playing withna gun. Demtexan Dec 2017 #18
Oh, no. But...they didn't pull the plug? Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #19
I guess the family wanted to keep him around. Demtexan Dec 2017 #21
Oh, how awful. What a tragic situation. I'm so sorry to hear that. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #22
My Mother needed a nursing home. Demtexan Dec 2017 #23
2018 bdamomma Dec 2017 #10
Historically, a thriving middle class keeps the 1% in check. haele Dec 2017 #14
The fat cats need to rethink this. If the po' folk die off, who'll be the maids and gardeners? Vinca Dec 2017 #15

Igel

(35,317 posts)
1. More like "that's the effect given a particular cause."
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 08:24 PM
Dec 2017

It's not, "We're reducing the spending." But instead, "If we do this, spending will, consequently, be reduced."

The "this" is repeating the health-care mandate. Fewer people would seek insurance, the logic goes; therefore the Medicaid expansion would cost less. This is a predicted reduction consequent upon the actions of the bill, a predicted effect. In fact, a number of costs to the government would decrease (those "costs" have as their flip side "free" or "subsidized" health care).

This is a reasonable parallel: the stimulus package of 2009 was predicted to create jobs, but at no point did the President say, "Let there be this many new jobs."

The CBO's track record on predictions is spotty. In other words, the "cuts" may or may not occur, even if Congress does what the CBO assumes it will. The creation, like the cuts, are resultant, not dictated.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
16. She said it was a reduction in spending. The health care bill WAS, in fact, a reduction in spending.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 05:02 PM
Dec 2017

It was a reduction in FUTURE funding. It wasn't that that would be the effect of the law. It was really a reduction in spending, and was budgeted accordingly.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
20. I worked in Mental health for many many years.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 09:01 PM
Dec 2017

Medicaid was a key factor in the state budgets for MH service. esp. for Crisis services. Ala. actually had a pretty good Mental Health system for a decade or so.

When the ER has suicidal patients, abused patients, "is he crazy or is he on a drug?" patients, you called the Crisis Counselor who was paid by Medicaid funded Mental Health services. The counselor evaluated the patient and if needed, patient could be
transfered to a 72 hour hold facility, then was seen by a therapist, at the MH clinic, within 2 days.

Half the people I saw had a drug/alcohol problem. We had treatment for that, too.

That service is no longer funded. The 72 hour mandatory hold law is still on the books, there just is no facility funded now.

A republican doctor who knows me via the past Crisis contacts, who ranted and raved against "ObamaCare, Socialism"
( her exact phrase) now complains she has no help when people in crisis clog the ER.

I simply told her "that's what happens when Congress and the states refuse to fund the programs"

Such a damn shame innocent people have to suffer because of this and supposedly educated doctors have no clue how their hospital is funded.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
13. Kiss all those small town critical access hospital's goodbye and enjoy your stupid vote for trump
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 04:33 PM
Dec 2017

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
4. ERs will be over loaded.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 08:37 PM
Dec 2017

Medical care going down hill. Majority of Medicaid recipients cannot afford the high cost of coverage. People will die, and there is absolutely no reason why American people should suffer. Greed, one the deadly sins.

Irish_Dem

(47,128 posts)
6. People will die. That is the point. Old people and sick children are useless eaters.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 08:48 PM
Dec 2017

Keep alive the worker bees.
Slave/Master plantation economy paradigm.

jalan48

(13,870 posts)
5. The corporations and the wealthy buy the politicians so what do we expect?
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 08:38 PM
Dec 2017

It's a pay to play government with politicians getting sweet little deals when they leave office.

-Steph-

(409 posts)
7. According to Republicans, asking the wealthy to pay their fair share is the all dreaded, and to be
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 10:19 PM
Dec 2017

feared, "socialism". However, they don't even so much as bat an eyelash at shifting money from the middle class and poor to the already wealthy. For that, they just call it "tax cuts".

BittyJenkins

(411 posts)
8. How can that ever be OK
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 10:21 PM
Dec 2017

for a soul to think that is alright. It will definitely change my life and thousands of other lives. Oh so sad for man and woman kind. Feeling very down lately.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
9. The GOP wants to punish the people who did not vote for them, plainly political abuse of power, ...
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 10:26 PM
Dec 2017

that and outright theft from the US Treasury.

Glorfindel

(9,730 posts)
11. But a very great many people who will be affected by the Medicaid cuts DID vote for the pukes
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 10:49 PM
Dec 2017

They just haven't thought through the consequences. Most people in nursing homes are covered by Medicaid. When the idiots who elected tRump and the other pukes have to start paying to keep their 85-year-old mother* in the nursing home, the harsh reality of their ignorance will strike home. Five to seven thousand dollars a month will do that for you, rather quickly. And I have no - zero - sympathy for those who voted for pukes.

(*85-year-old mother is only an example. LOTS of people in nursing homes who are covered by Medicaid are not 85-year-old mothers.)

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)
12. My nursing home my mother lived in had young people living there.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 01:00 AM
Dec 2017

There were middle age people living there.

The youngest was 22.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
17. Yes. I think some don't realize that.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 05:03 PM
Dec 2017

My older sister had a massive stroke at a young age and hd to go into a nursing home (there were no other facilities that could take her). She relied on Medicaid and Medicare. She was middle aged. There were young people there, as well....disabilities, even mental issues.

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)
18. The 22 year old was playing withna gun.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 05:28 PM
Dec 2017

Shot himself in the head.

Brain dead.

Young people have accidents.

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)
21. I guess the family wanted to keep him around.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 10:37 PM
Dec 2017

Really sad.

He might be gone by now.

Half his skull was missing.

He was not there anymore.

He was a 6 ft baby.

Could do nothing for himself.

Just lay in a johnnie chair.

That is brain dead to me.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
22. Oh, how awful. What a tragic situation. I'm so sorry to hear that.
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 10:04 AM
Dec 2017

And I felt sorry for my sister after her stroke, but it was nothing like this.

But that is where I really saw how important Medicaid is. And she wasn't getting top level care. It's minimal care, given on a shoestring budget. But if it hadn't been there, I don't know what we would've done. Her care could not have been done by laypersons.

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)
23. My Mother needed a nursing home.
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 04:22 PM
Dec 2017

I found a really good home.

She had many health problems.

A lot of people will die.

Did not have to be.







bdamomma

(63,868 posts)
10. 2018
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 10:31 PM
Dec 2017

we need to all get out there and VOTE. This is sickening they are stealing from us and being very proud of themselves. The Middle Class is being shafted. Why do the Rich hate the Middle Class or why do the rich feel so threatened by us/Middle Class.

I hope they (that 1%) choke on it.

haele

(12,660 posts)
14. Historically, a thriving middle class keeps the 1% in check.
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 04:50 PM
Dec 2017
All revolutions have sprung from the middle class trying to keep or regain what had been taken from them by the 1%.
It takes a certain amount of free time to be able to organize, and a certain amount of outrage to act.
The poor and the unemployable are usually too busy trying to survive to be able to either organize or act.

The short-sighted plan is to neuter the middle class enough that the "moneyed elite" as the 1% like to think of themselves still have a somewhat educated workforce that can be harvested for revenue and ideas, but workforce will be too strained or busy to have enough energy to be more than drone in the system.

Of course, the 1% is more clever than wise when it comes to smarts - they never really think beyond more than gaining the political and economic power and assuming that once they gain that power, nothing else can happen.
Except, of course, for those who want to bring about the "Second coming of Jesus" to avoid having to take responsibility for their selfish excess, perversions, and greed.
If you can be sure the World ends when you do, why should you take the time to consider what the repercussions of your actions are on the future? Just go on emotion and indulge yourself.
Your grandchildren are not going to have to live through whatever hellscape you've wrought, after all...

Haele

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
15. The fat cats need to rethink this. If the po' folk die off, who'll be the maids and gardeners?
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 04:54 PM
Dec 2017

They also have this magical thinking going on where communicable diseases do not touch wealthy Republicans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»$179Billion in Medicaid c...