Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 06:56 PM Apr 2012

Vomiting road workers hospitalized after exposing mysterious nuclear waste

Source: Fox News

Road workers began vomiting and were
hospitalized Wednesday after being exposed to
suspected nuclear material, unearthed during a
highway upgrade in Australia.

Meanwhile the country's nuclear authority was
scrambling for answers after the apparent
radioactive waste was uncovered on the Pacific
Highway south of Port Macquarie, in New South
Wales.

The material, said to include cesium, is believed
to have been buried after a truck carrying
radioactive isotopes from Sydney's Lucas
Heights nuclear reactor crashed in the area in
December 1980, The (Sydney) Daily Telegraph
reported. The isotopes are believed to have
been destined for the US.

The upgrade's project manager, Bob Higgins,
said the workers became sick after unearthing a
strange clay-like material, according to
Australian Associated Press.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/04/18/vomiting-road-workers-hospitalized-after-exposing-mysterious-nuclear-waste/

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vomiting road workers hospitalized after exposing mysterious nuclear waste (Original Post) bananas Apr 2012 OP
This is the problem with nuclear energy and its waste. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #1
Yep. You can't just bury it LiberalEsto Apr 2012 #2
Nonsease. Long term nuclear waste storage is perfectly safe. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #4
LOL!! You're funny but it makes a point! Ecumenist Apr 2012 #8
teehee w0nderer Apr 2012 #16
New or pre-owned? Fumesucker Apr 2012 #21
Pre-owned but yes it has a fantastic vista of the bay. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #25
Check's in the mail.. n/t Fumesucker Apr 2012 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Apr 2012 #3
die marshall gaines Apr 2012 #5
Depends. Really depends. Taverner Apr 2012 #17
They lie so rich people can get richer. The most important thing in the world is for valerief Apr 2012 #18
''....why do governments lie to us so much?'' DeSwiss Apr 2012 #23
200,000 years of this. Oh, boy. saras Apr 2012 #6
Invisible hazards KT2000 Apr 2012 #7
If they were vomiting after a brief exposure drm604 Apr 2012 #9
Come on, this is Fox News. TheWraith Apr 2012 #11
Something like that does seem a lot more likely, yeah Posteritatis Apr 2012 #14
Not necessarily. enlightenment Apr 2012 #32
Yeah, but for it to be immediate it needs to be a huge, dramatic dose Posteritatis Apr 2012 #40
the article doesn't say how long got root Apr 2012 #42
I was going by the PM saying it happened when they got close to it Posteritatis Apr 2012 #44
Faux News is suddenly warning of nuke waste dangers? I doubt it wordpix Apr 2012 #31
No freaking kidding. I hope it's psychosomatic, or some other less potentially fatal toxic exposure enki23 Apr 2012 #12
Unbelievable! Liber-AL Apr 2012 #10
Pacific Highway site 'clear' of radioactive waste, Roads Minister Duncan Gay says FarCenter Apr 2012 #13
WHAT? "Sick with worry." wordpix Apr 2012 #33
It is either psychosomatic or possibly ordinary chemical waste FarCenter Apr 2012 #43
But nuclear waste is NATURAL Taverner Apr 2012 #15
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #19
"You people" is unfortunate language.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #22
And THAT had/has absolutely nothing to do with civilian nuclear power. TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #24
I guess you missed the part about humans not being particularly rational? Fumesucker Apr 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Apr 2012 #28
It's not going to hurt anything sitting on the Moon.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #36
You sure? csziggy Apr 2012 #39
why are you kowtowing to Mr. Pro-nuke-with=the-bad-language? wordpix Apr 2012 #30
The poster turned out to be right in this case for one thing.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #34
where do you get THAT info? Just b/c the gov't of Aust. says it? wordpix Apr 2012 #35
Radiation intense enough to cause nausea that quickly would have killed quickly too.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #37
To sicken someone with radiation that immediately, you'd need a huge dose Posteritatis Apr 2012 #41
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #29
You know so much about me do you? TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #38
Skylab! Wait, it's Fox News. Clinton's dick! n/t Bossy Monkey Apr 2012 #20

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
1. This is the problem with nuclear energy and its waste.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:01 PM
Apr 2012

We think we are depositing the waste in a "safe" area that will never be inhabited, and area in which it will never cause harm to humans or even wildlife. But the world gets smaller and smaller and there is less and less wasteland in which to throw our poisonous waste.

We cannot impose our nuclear waste on future generations. That is one of the main reasons that I oppose nuclear energy.

cstanleytech

(26,322 posts)
4. Nonsease. Long term nuclear waste storage is perfectly safe.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:08 PM
Apr 2012

BTW I have this nice bridge for sale in San Francisco overlooking the bay and I am wondering if anyone would be interested in purchasing it?

Response to bananas (Original post)

 

marshall gaines

(347 posts)
5. die
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:16 PM
Apr 2012

after being exposed to something like this, will they die? why do governments lie to us so much? why is power(perceived) such a drug that people with it lose their humanity? this world is evil.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
17. Depends. Really depends.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 08:45 PM
Apr 2012

Depends on a lot of things that I, as a non nuclear physicist, and not a physicist at all, don't know

valerief

(53,235 posts)
18. They lie so rich people can get richer. The most important thing in the world is for
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:38 PM
Apr 2012

rich people to get richer. Really. Think about it. It drives EVERYTHING.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
23. ''....why do governments lie to us so much?''
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 11:29 PM
Apr 2012
- Because they know that we know what they've done to us. And they're afraid one day we won't take it anymore and make them pay for it......

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
6. 200,000 years of this. Oh, boy.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:18 PM
Apr 2012

Exactly what was predicted by science fiction back in the fifties. We'll have to have an eternal priesthood to take care of the waste and warn us away from it. Maybe we can build giant pyramids in the desert and bury it under them, thereby guaranteeing that grave robbers dig it up and spread it around in a few hundred years.

KT2000

(20,588 posts)
7. Invisible hazards
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:26 PM
Apr 2012

whether chemical, nuclear waste etc., we depend upon those who know about the incident to do the right thing. When money is at stake - that is an easy call.
I just hope these people are OK and don't have long lasting effects. The people responsible for leaving it there have a ton of ways to avoid liability.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
9. If they were vomiting after a brief exposure
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:59 PM
Apr 2012

they are likely in big trouble. They must have received a large dose, possibly a fatal dose.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
11. Come on, this is Fox News.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 08:02 PM
Apr 2012

These are the same people who reported that authorities dug up Sarin gas in a doctor's backyard a few years ago. Give it a week, and you'll find out these guys ruptured a sewer line.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
14. Something like that does seem a lot more likely, yeah
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 08:11 PM
Apr 2012

If the workers had gotten that sick immediately upon exposure, they'd already be dead.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
40. Yeah, but for it to be immediate it needs to be a huge, dramatic dose
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:38 AM
Apr 2012

Plenty of things can immediately nauseate someone, but radiation in most "reasonable" doses isn't one of them.

Hours to a couple of days, maybe, but the article's talking about people who began vomiting merely by getting close to whatever it was they found; that quick a reaction would need a couple of dozen Grays and is getting into the territory of being near something that was actually critical.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
44. I was going by the PM saying it happened when they got close to it
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 10:51 AM
Apr 2012

That suggests something happened pretty quickly, anyway.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
31. Faux News is suddenly warning of nuke waste dangers? I doubt it
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:10 AM
Apr 2012

These are the communications mavens of King Cong (coal, oil, nuclear, gas)

enki23

(7,790 posts)
12. No freaking kidding. I hope it's psychosomatic, or some other less potentially fatal toxic exposure
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 08:05 PM
Apr 2012

Otherwise, they'd best prepare their wills, and their lawyers.

 

Liber-AL

(71 posts)
10. Unbelievable!
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 08:01 PM
Apr 2012

A cleanup should have been top priority. An investigation of top government officials is in order!

No warning signs? No fenced in area with symbols for radiation attached along the length? Whoever is responsible, if they haven't died already, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
13. Pacific Highway site 'clear' of radioactive waste, Roads Minister Duncan Gay says
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 08:08 PM
Apr 2012
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/pacific-highway-site-clear-of-radioactive-waste-roads-minister-duncan-gay-says/story-e6frg6nf-1226331772039

Mr Gay said initial investigations had found no radioactive material at the site, but assured people the government was "treating this investigation seriously and we are taking all the necessary precautions to protect workers at the site".

"Independent chemical specialists could not find any radioactive material present in samples taken from the site to date, but investigations are ongoing into any other possible contaminated substances," Mr Gay said in a statement.

He said a broader investigation would be conducted into the Pacific Highway site, but he said the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) had confirmed a container that fell from the truck in 1980 did not rupture and had been transported to Brisbane.

...

But Frank Harris, an Australian expert with nearly 25 years' experience in radiation protection, said the Pacific Highway workers on Wednesday simply could not have fallen ill as a result of exposure. "This description of people vomiting after being for a short time in close proximity (to the material) cannot happen from any of the radiation sources in Australia," the former Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) scientist told AAP. But he said it wasn't out of the question that the Pacific Highway workers could have become sick with worry.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
33. WHAT? "Sick with worry."
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:12 AM
Apr 2012

You've gotta be kidding. Yeah, every time my 16 y.o. drives the car, I start vomiting.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
43. It is either psychosomatic or possibly ordinary chemical waste
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 09:49 AM
Apr 2012

Given the speed with which nausea occured.


See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident for the details of how 4 people died of Cesium-137 radiation in Brazil.

Response to bananas (Original post)

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
22. "You people" is unfortunate language..
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 10:56 PM
Apr 2012

Everyone has an agenda, it's hardly unusual.

Most of us have a subject or three about which we're not particularly rational, man isn't a rational animal for the most part but rather an animal that rationalizes.

You say "nuclear" to a lot people and they see something like this, it's unfortunate but a lot of us grew up cowering under school desks practicing for the day that happened all over the world.






 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
24. And THAT had/has absolutely nothing to do with civilian nuclear power.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 11:38 PM
Apr 2012

And THAT could still happen in a fucking heartbeat if every last nuclear power plant and scrap of waste on the planet suddenly disappeared into the heart of the Sun.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
26. I guess you missed the part about humans not being particularly rational?
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 11:48 PM
Apr 2012

It's irrational to ignore the essential irrationality of the people your'e dealing with.

Overcoming my own knee-jerk reaction to the words nuclear power is difficult, I don't always manage it and I certainly don't trust private industry to exercise all due caution with things nuclear, government can be slipshod enough but at least they don't have the raw naked profit motive for cutting corners that private industry has.

Didn't mean to irritate you, just telling it like I see it..

Response to TheMadMonk (Reply #24)

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
36. It's not going to hurt anything sitting on the Moon..
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:26 AM
Apr 2012

A whole lot easier to drop something on the Moon than it is to send the same package to the Sun. The orbital velocity of the Earth is about 30 kilometers per second, you have to shed most of that to get to the Sun *after* you got to Earth orbit.. The orbital velocity of the Moon around the Earth on the other hand is only 1 kilometer per second...

The Sun is actually a difficult place to get to from the Earth in terms of delta vee (fuel usage basically).



wordpix

(18,652 posts)
30. why are you kowtowing to Mr. Pro-nuke-with=the-bad-language?
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:07 AM
Apr 2012

Seems you're apologetic for not being gung ho about nukes.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
34. The poster turned out to be right in this case for one thing..
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:17 AM
Apr 2012

Evidently radiation had nothing to do with the incident in question, something the poster had deduced from inconsistencies in the story.

For another, I have to try pretty hard not to let my inner asshole out, sometimes I overdo and seem like an actual nice person.

It's a failing..Mea culpa.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
35. where do you get THAT info? Just b/c the gov't of Aust. says it?
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:24 AM
Apr 2012

I don't believe a word coming from any gov. about anything like this. Whether it's a heckuva job in Katrina, spraying "safe" Corexit in the Gulf or a Fukushima meltdown, gov's lie most of the time in such situations.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
37. Radiation intense enough to cause nausea that quickly would have killed quickly too..
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:27 AM
Apr 2012

Those workers would be dead or dying by now with all sorts of nasty symptoms, almost like turning inside out.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
41. To sicken someone with radiation that immediately, you'd need a huge dose
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:45 AM
Apr 2012

I mean huge huge, like "insert plutonium in mouth" huge, or "an actual nuclear weapon went off nearby" huge. The symptoms described in the article are symptoms of radiation sickness, but the onset for all but the most incredibly spectacular cases of high dosages are hours todays, not seconds to minutes.

Even Slotin's dose from the Demon Core took a little time to get to those kinds of levels, and he was actually holding a critical chunk of plutonium for a moment to get what he got.

Response to Post removed (Reply #19)

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
38. You know so much about me do you?
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:35 AM
Apr 2012

For the record, my sole connection with the nuclear industry is I once worked part time doing IT for a management consulting company, which wrote a report on glassification of waste. Oh and I painted their offices too.

The subject is simply something which has interested me since I was a child, and as such I pay attention to FACT and put the boot into people who have the sheer gall to tell me to my face that their beliefs overide any possible truths.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Vomiting road workers hos...