Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(10,908 posts)
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 05:41 PM Feb 2015

Filthy India air cutting 660 million lives short by 3 years

Source: Associated Press

India's filthy air is cutting 660 million lives short by about three years, according to research published Saturday. ... It estimates that 99.5 percent of India's 1.2 billion people are breathing in pollution levels above what the WHO deems as safe.

While New Delhi last year earned the dubious title of being the world's most polluted city, India's air pollution problem is extensive, with 13 Indian cities now on the World Health Organization's list of the 20 most polluted.

While India has pledged to grow its clean energy sector, with huge boosts for solar and wind power, it also has committed to tripling its coal-fired electricity capacity to 450 gigawatts by 2030. Yet there still are no regulations for pollutants like sulfur dioxide or mercury emissions, while fuel standards remain far below Western norms and existing regulations often are ignored.

To meet its goal for coal-fired electricity, the Power Ministry says the country will double coal production to 1 billion tons within five years. The coal expansion plans through 2030 will at least double sulphur dioxide levels, along with those of nitrogen oxide and lung-clogging particulate matter ...



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/filthy-india-air-cutting-660-million-lives-short-101636775.html



I thought China was the worst of the worst as far as air pollution. Apparently not.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BarbaRosa

(2,684 posts)
2. I lived in New Delhi for a year in 1966-7.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 07:28 PM
Feb 2015

There was a permanent haze, and unique aroma. Now as I watch the F1 race (the track is within 30 miles of where I used to live) I notice how much worse it is now. In the shots of down the front straightaway you can barely see the far end of the track.

We don't need no stinking regulations (if needed)

progree

(10,908 posts)
3. In 1967 population: 520 Million, now: 1282 Million
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 08:53 PM
Feb 2015

Though thankfully, the fertility rate has declined to 2.50 (replacement level is something like 2.1 or 2.2 IIRC).

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/india-population/

progree

(10,908 posts)
4. The dramatic dot video of population growth. A world map beginning in 1 A.D. with 1 dot = 1 million
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 08:55 PM
Feb 2015

The dramatic dot video of population growth. A world map beginning in 1 A.D. with 1 dot = 1 million people

http://www.populationconnection.org/site/PageServer?pagename=issues_main



It is about 6 1/2 minutes long but you can skip the first 2 minutes -- the actual dot stuff begins at 2:00 and ends at 5:42. At 5:00 have reached about 1600 A.D. while the population is still quite modest outside of India and China. (So if you are in a time bind, you can start at 5:00 and watch just the last 42 seconds) "As the film neared present day and the dots started flying onto the screen, there were audible gasps, wide staring eyes, and mumblings of "no way" and "I knew we were growing but not THAT much."

romanic

(2,841 posts)
7. Wow
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 06:32 PM
Feb 2015

Great video. It's crazy to see that India and China already had large populations well before American Colonialism. :O

progree

(10,908 posts)
8. Yeah, I found that interesting too. In school a bazillion years ago I was taught that
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 06:57 PM
Feb 2015

China and East Asia generally had a very dense population (relative to almost anywhere else in the world) in ancient times because rice cultivation supports a much larger population per acre than other grains. As for India, I never heard an explanation -- but maybe they grew a lot of rice in ancient times too. From this pie chart, India has a lot of rice production too in modern times -- 19.7/28.9 = 68% of the rice production of China (in 2010). With 90% of China's population in 2010. ( 1206 M vs. 1338 M ). So India is not that far from China in per capita rice production.



Lots more where that came from: Google: images rice production india china
For population of China (and India, bonus), Google: population of China
and the top entry is a graph showing both countries plus (another bonus) the U.S.

It's crazy to see that India and China already had large populations well before American Colonialism. :O

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. China is bad really bad as well
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 07:00 AM
Feb 2015

So bad that the yellow dust from the Gobi Desert blows into the sky (because of deforestation) and picks up the pollutants over China and that travels to Korea and Japan causing health risks in those countries as well.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Filthy India air cutting ...