Bill O’Reilly’s Argentina story challenged by ex-CBS News journalist
Source: Washington Post
Fox News host Bill OReilly did his utmost at weeks end to discredit a Mother Jones story on his alleged embellishments of his reporting from Argentina in 1982. After the story by David Corn and Daniel Schulman hit the Internet on Thursday afternoon, the famous TV personality spent hours on the phone with reporters blasting it. David Corn is a guttersnipe liar, OReilly told this blog. And on his show last night, he repeated the attacks.
The apparent goal of OReillys frenzy was to keep the story from breaking into the next week.
A Facebook posting by a former CBS News correspondent, however, appears likely to keep the questions flowing toward the OReilly camp. An extensive rant by Eric Jon Engberg, who served as a CBS News correspondent for 27 years, calls into question several of OReillys statements about the reporting and OReillys subsequent recollections of it.
(...)
Engberg: The only place where such an injury could have occurred was the relatively tame riot I have described above. Neither [Larry] Doyle, who would have been immediately informed of injury to any CBS personnel, nor anyone else who was working the story remembers a cameraman being injured that night. No one who reported back to our hotel newsroom after the disturbance was injured; if a cameraman had been bleeding from the ear he would have immediately reported that to his superiors at the hotel. This allegation on OReillys part, alleges Engberg, is not credible without further confirmation. Further, he calls on OReilly to identify the cameraman as a way of allowing the vetting of the story.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2015/02/21/bill-oreillys-argentina-story-challenged-by-ex-cbs-news-journalist/
Engberg's original piece on FB (you need to log in to read):
https://www.facebook.com/eric.j.engberg?fref=nf&pnref=story
Here's hoping this story grows legs. BillO needs suspended, if FOX has anywhere near the standards NBC does (bit let's not kid ourselves)
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)We'll do it live! I'LL DO IT LIVE!!!!!
turbinetree
(24,701 posts)There are NO WORDS ON IT, this is absolutely CLASSIC----thanks
wolfie001
(2,240 posts).......
d_r
(6,907 posts)wolfie001
(2,240 posts)Assholery usually comes back around
Stuart G
(38,427 posts)But the number of these "clarifications" of the "shameless prick" do seem to be growing..
Archae
(46,328 posts)Wasn't it "BillO The Clown?"
He sure deserves that epithet.
George II
(67,782 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)IMO he could be driven into an on-air meltdown over this. And it wouldn't be hard to accomplish.
E-mail focksnooz and tell them you are a regular viewer. If you're a veteran tell them that as well. Inform them that you are appalled at O'Reilly's embellishment of a routine reporting assignment to try to fool viewers into believing he somehow was involved in combat. Say it's a disgrace and an affront to "the troops" as well as to legitimate combat reporters. It's essential to his self image that he is portrayed as a macho man, so if you can, include something about his wife's affair with a Long Island cop and O'Reilly's chickenshit reaction to it. CC other news outlets.
If they hear this enough foxnooz will have to do something. If the story grows legs and gets covered in other media they'll be under the gun. O'Reilly isn't strong enough to handle this kind of criticism without lashing out. Sooner or later he'll snap and make a public spectacle of himself.
The ideal conclusion to this episode is to see O'Reilly led off the set of the "factor" babbling in a straight jacket.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)That's probably at the lower end of their demographic. They REALLY can't afford to lose the 60 somethings, because most of the rest of their audience will be dead in 10 years (or so demented they just stare at test patterns as well as anything).
I didn't see Vietnam although I was a VEV. I am also over 60 so I hope I haven't offended anyone. I just hate Bill O'Really?
Stuart G
(38,427 posts)El Shaman
(583 posts)I believe him--------------------full of BS!!!
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)that was dumped on Williams?
Cha
(297,240 posts)means he's on to Something Big!
fox "news" won't do anything except give him a raise.. but it might sully billo's creds just a bit from people who actually care about the truth.
George II
(67,782 posts)cynzke
(1,254 posts)Here is a ABC news clip from 6/16/1982, the morning after the riot that Billo lied about. Argentina surrendered on the 14th., a brief riot broke out on the 15th. In his book, Billo claims rioters BROKE INTO the palace...FALSE. He claimed massive fatalities with soldiers gunning down civilians, etc. Well if all this REALLY happened, don't you think it would be covered in this report the next morning?
http://abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/june-16-1982-aftermath-falkland-war-10148016
truthisfreedom
(23,147 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)By lying about his non-existent combat experience, O'Reilly has demeaned every service member who has experienced the terror of combat.