UK nuclear sites warned over drone terror attack
Source: Express
Such an attack could kill tens of thousands of people, a Government adviser has warned. But authorities are burying their heads in the sand, according to John Large.
His call for an urgent security overhaul comes as figures showed nuclear power plants suffered 37 security breaches last year the highest number also been breached a dozen times since 2011, including by at least one drone.
<snip>
The accessibility of the UK plants to small UAVs [unmanned airborne vehicles] is relatively unimpeded."
<snip>
Last night Tory MP Mark Pritchard, a member of the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy, said Mr Larges recommendations would be taken very seriously.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/559718/Nclear-plants-are-at-risk-from-a-terrorist-strike-by-unmanned-drones
bananas
(27,509 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)paleotn
(17,931 posts)...damn!
Mustellus
(328 posts)from a 747.
I have no idea if its true, but tens of feet of concrete and rebar will probably keep out most of your KMart - bought kiddie kopters.
First, you're talking about two different kinds of attacks. As we saw in Fukushima, all you have to do is disable the cooling system for a few hours to cause a meltdown. That could be done in many different ways, by disabling the electrical systems, the pumps, the generators, the pipes, etc.
Second, the containment vessels are NOT designed to take a direct hit from a 747:
The NRC recognizes that nuclear power plants, including the SFP [Spent Fuel Pools],
were not specifically designed to withstand the impact of a large commercial airplane fully
loaded with fuel
The Commission views that the nations efforts associated with protecting against terrorist
attacks by air should be directed toward enhancing security at airports and on airplanes
The NRC has been in regular communication with other Federal agencies, specifically the
FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] and DOD [Department of Defense], which have
acted more than once to protect airspace above nuclear power plants
<snip>
a) None of the UKs nuclear reactors has a containment which has been specifically designed to resist
aircraft attack other than at Sizewell B, like at the French reactors, where the secondary
containment dome is designed to resist an accidental impact of a light aircraft. In Germany and the
United States, more recent containment buildings have been designed to withstand the impact of a
military fighter jet. However, none have been specifically designed to withstand the impact of large
aircraft fully loaded with fuel.
b) None of the radioactive waste and spent fuel facilities, at the nuclear power plants, at BNFL
Sellafield and COGEMA La Hague, could withstand the directed impact of a fully loaded
commercial airliner; and
c) many of the radioactive waste and fuel storage facilities, again at the nuclear power plants and at
Sellafield and La Hague contain massive amounts of radioactive material available for suspension
and dispersal in the aftermath of a terrorist attack.
http://www.laka.org/docu/boeken/pdf/6-02-0-20-03.pdf
Mustellus
(328 posts)Are the "the electrical systems, the pumps, the generators, the pipes, etc." at risk from Kiddie Kopters?
bananas
(27,509 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/french-government-on-high-alert-after-unexplained-drone-flights-over-nuclear-power-stations-9850138.html
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)for your answer