Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,665 posts)
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 08:55 PM Mar 2015

FTC sues DirecTV, alleges hidden fees and deceptive ads

Source: AP-Excite

By JENNIFER C. KERR

WASHINGTON (AP) — The government is taking the nation's biggest satellite TV provider to court, accusing DirecTV of misleading millions of consumers about the cost of its programming.

The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that its complaint charges DirecTV Inc. with deceptively advertising a discounted 12-month programming package. Consumers weren't clearly told that the package requires a two-year contract, the commission said.

The advertising, the FTC said, did not make clear that the cost of the package would increase by up to $45 more per month in the second year and that hefty early cancellation fees — up to $480 — would apply. The allegations of deceptive advertising date back to 2007 and cover more recent marketing campaigns, such as one in late 2014 that offered the company's subscription service on a limited basis for "only $19.99" a month.

"We require businesses to be truthful and to give consumers the information they need to make informed choices about goods and services," said Jessica Rich, head of the agency's consumer protection bureau. "Companies can't hide important information from consumers to trick them into buying goods and services — and that's what we allege DirecTV did."

FULL story at link.



FILE - In this May 6, 2010 file photo, a DirecTV satellite dish is attached to a roof at a home in Palo Alto, Calif. The government is taking the nation's biggest satellite TV provider to court, accusing DirecTV of misleading millions of consumers about the cost of its programming. The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that its complaint charges DirecTV Inc. with deceptively advertising a discounted 12-month programming package. Consumers weren't clearly told that the package requires a two-year contract, the commission said. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150311/us--ftc_sues_directv-0ab4260ed1.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FTC sues DirecTV, alleges hidden fees and deceptive ads (Original Post) Omaha Steve Mar 2015 OP
You mean some big company would cheat somebody? Stuart G Mar 2015 #1
Now they only need to go after project_bluebook Mar 2015 #2
Hmm ybbor Mar 2015 #3
I had to put one of my kids up for adoption Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2015 #4
Hopefully it was the kid who liked Sprout... ybbor Mar 2015 #7
ALWAYS think Politicalboi Mar 2015 #5
They all lie--but I think those guys lie the most. nt MADem Mar 2015 #6
When I signed up for Direct TV, Mr.Bill Mar 2015 #8
I dropped Dish about 10 yrs. ago because they changed their programming. bearssoapbox Mar 2015 #9
Direct TV must spend a fortune on mailings HoosierCowboy Mar 2015 #10

Stuart G

(38,436 posts)
1. You mean some big company would cheat somebody?
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 08:58 PM
Mar 2015

False ads?
hard to read contracts?
etc.
etc.


Say it ain't so...Shoeless Joe...

ybbor

(1,554 posts)
3. Hmm
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 09:03 PM
Mar 2015

Can I use this as leverage to discount my monthly rate? I called them this week regarding the increase.

I was aware of the two year deal, tho.


 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
4. I had to put one of my kids up for adoption
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 09:07 PM
Mar 2015

get my wife to try prostitution, and give up my morning latte just to pay for a basic package. Sometimes I think consumers are just wage slaves.

ybbor

(1,554 posts)
7. Hopefully it was the kid who liked Sprout...
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 09:24 PM
Mar 2015

Cause that will drop you to the next lower package and save you $9 a month. My wife just likes her too much. Oh wait that is not sarcastic! The adoption part is.

If I wasn't such an effing sports junkie we would have ditched it long ago. Turns out it is still cheaper than going to the bar to watch "my" teams.

Mr.Bill

(24,304 posts)
8. When I signed up for Direct TV,
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 10:45 PM
Mar 2015

the incentive was not a low basic price, but some free premium channels for three months. My installer was nice enough to warn me that if I did not call and cancel those channels in three months, I would automatically begin to be billed the full price for them. I admit I did not read the whole contract, but I would not have known about having to cancel them myself had my installer not told me.

bearssoapbox

(1,408 posts)
9. I dropped Dish about 10 yrs. ago because they changed their programming.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 01:20 AM
Mar 2015

Seems that now you need a magnifying glass and an hour to read and figure out fine print/double talk in the ads.

Seems like they all do it now to some degree or another.

Haven't had sat. or cable since then.

My wife watches tv but I don't. Haven't since May 2013. Don't miss it.

HoosierCowboy

(561 posts)
10. Direct TV must spend a fortune on mailings
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 09:43 AM
Mar 2015

I've been getting two to three mailings from them a week, for almost a decade. At 40 cents a pop, there is no way they could make that up if I signed on, unless of course, they gouge people.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FTC sues DirecTV, alleges...