Putin's spokesman dismisses rumors about poor health
Source: AP-Excite
MOSCOW (AP) President Vladimir Putin's spokesman has dismissed rumors circulating on the Internet that the Russian leader is in poor health.
Dmitry Peskov told Ekho Moskvy radio station Thursday that the president was "absolutely" healthy, adding that the president's handshake was still so strong it could "break your hand."
A Kremlin announcement Wednesday that Putin would postpone an upcoming trip to Kazakhstan set off a flurry of rumors online, with some suggesting that Putin had could be seriously ill and others positing that he could be planning for the ouster of a major government figure.
Putin has not been seen in public since he gave a televised address to members of the Interior Ministry on March 5.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150312/eu--russia-putin-3934beef7a.html
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)The tyrants always do.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)This obsession with overthrowing the legally and democratically elected, well-beloved and 80% approval rating Putin by the State Dept Neocons is most unhealthy for the US.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)But in a way I guess thats right. When you kill or imprison most of your opponents you actually CAN win an election!
With a little work, he can achieve the 100% vote tally of N Korea's "Dear Leader"! Maybe thats why they're buddies:
Demeter
(85,373 posts)He now has support in the 80% range.
Can YOUR President make the same claim?
7962
(11,841 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)kill or jail his opponents and actually runs in open and free elections. Putin is nothing more than a dictator
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Obama hasn't prosecuted the war criminals like W and Cheney, NOR has he prosecuted the Banksters like Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein, who stole and broke the economy in 2006....
and he may get the option of jailing the GOP candidates for 2016, if he prosecutes them for treason...but he won't get to run. Tough luck, that.
IMO, when a politician steals half a million dollars, he really belongs in jail. Russia's court system agreed, even though the crook was running against Putin....what a refreshing Rule of Law, not Men!
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #9)
uhnope This message was self-deleted by its author.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Holy hell that's telling.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Climate change is not a conspiracy theory.
Demeter (73,480 posts) Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:24 AM
1. I'm sorry, but I just don't buy the hype any more
When I go to investigate the databases they are using to make such claims, I find that they have maybe 30 years' worth of measurements, in random locations.
People didn't used to have a good way to micro-measure the weather...there wasn't the technology nor the training nor the interest. People didn't obsess about the weather--they coped. They made contingency plans; they worked to survive by building community.
And even today there's uneven data recording, as weather satellites drop out of the sky, wars ravage significantly large areas, funding gets cut... and even now, the data collection process is still quite spotty.
When you want to track climate, 200 years is a good start, 2000 years might show a trend. We don't have that kind of data for the planet. We don't have that kind of data for even specific locations. Much of the historical data is uncorroborated and suspect when it is not incomplete or totally missing.
If we want to influence the weather, reforestation is a proven technique on all continents over thousands of years. But that basic conservation technique goes against High Finance and Big Corporate Plundering.
End the tyranny of Profit Uber Alles, and you will find that Climate is not the crisis that they want you to believe it is.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1127&pid=48391
Demeter (73,480 posts) Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:24 AM
...
I am referring to the fact that the science of climate is still not well-defined, and there may be unknown actors and agents in the world's climate system that
a) make mitigation unnecessary
b) make mitigation impossible
c) completely obscure cause and effect
And I say the science is not well defined because it cannot create an experiment, let alone a repeatable and verifiable experiment. The data that they are working with is anything but complete, as well, so they could be jumping to premature or totally off-track conclusions.
Archeology and climate science have a lot in common...they use as scientific a method as possible to collect their information, but they are history, not science.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1127&pid=68069
uhnope
(6,419 posts)or, if not at all, feel free to clear that up.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)me if I'm wrong.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bosonic
(3,746 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Igel
(35,320 posts)is intriguing.
It cites the Russian mission in Kazakhstan as the source of the "Putin's sick" rumor, since he was supposed to be there for meetings with the head of Kazakhstan and Lukashenko and cancelled.
Two "appearances" include footage of him meeting with some woman. But the footage was from before Women's Day--before last Thursday.
And another photo was him meeting with the Karelian governor Khudilaynen. Sadly, that picture is from last Wednesday.
Gazeta Wyborcza concludes with a nice anecdote. In response to Peskov's comment that Putin's well and his handshake is "powerful enough to break a hand", they cite Eltsyn's former spokesman as saying when Eltsyn was on a bender and incapacitated the standard line was he was well and had a "handshake grip" (uscisk dloni ma mocny).
A couple of others are also in silence. Merkachova and Babushkin, who announced about Nemtsov's killers last Tuesday, are also (according to GW) silent.
Gazeta Wyborcza article here:
http://wyborcza.pl/1,75477,17557062,Czemu_prezydent_sie_ukrywa__Kreml_przedstawia_falszywe.html
This means, of course, that Putin should be splashed all over the media tomorrow. Even in GW isn't exactly a deranged newspaper and the article title's a bit over the top.
(And, yes, I'm a danged Slavist, not a Russianist. My required coursework was three Slavic languages, one at near-native fluency--Russian near native, but I wallowed in Serbian and Czech for a few years. Textbooks for some courses were in Polish, I did some research in Lodz, and I also had to read quite a bit in Bulgarian. In addition to reading tests with research in French and German, and a bit of classical Greek, and a couple of years' training in simultaneous interpretation between Spanish and English.)
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)These geniuses have been forced to resort to their old Cold War rhetoric because they can't think of anything else. They're too unoriginal and neuron-challenged.
- Besides, what else can they do? Orwell didn't cover anything like this in ''1984'' and so they're totally at a loss......
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Bosonic
(3,746 posts)Moscow (AFP) - A spokesman for Vladimir Putin on Friday denied rumours swirling in the European media that a baby had been born to the Russian leader.
Several news outlets reported that a woman romantically linked to Putin in the past had given birth, a possible explanation for the leader's unusual absence from the public eye that has sent the Russian rumour mill into overdrive.
"Information that a child has been born to Vladimir Putin is not true," Dmitry Peskov told Forbes Russia. "I am planning to appeal to people who have money to organise a competition for the best journalistic hoax," he added.
The Russian Twittersphere has been alive with speculation over the whereabouts of the typically omnipresent 62-year-old, after he cancelled several meetings this week.
http://news.yahoo.com/putin-spokesman-denies-baby-rumours-173423938.html;_ylt=AwrBJSCRIANVjHkARUvQtDMD
[center] [/center]