Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 08:39 AM Mar 2015

SNP wants to block military action as price of Labour deal

Source: The London Times

Britain should “not pretend to be a world power” and curbing interventionism would be a key plank of any post-election deal between Labour and the SNP, the head of the nationalists in the UK parliament declared yesterday.

The collaboration between the SNP and Labour to block military action in Syria in 2013 provides a template for future foreign policy co-operation between the two parties, according to Angus Robertson, the SNP leader in Westminster.

His move comes as new Times poll by You Gov shows that Labour has made no progress in clawing back votes in Scotland.

Read more: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/scotland/article4380715.ece



SNP refers to the Scottish National Party. Westminster refers to the seat of the UK Parliament in London. The UK has "devolved" varying degrees of governmental powers to some of its member states, i.e., Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, but not England.

For example, Wales and Scotland have each approved an indefinite ban on future fracking, so Big Fracking is trying to bribe the UK government to pass a law forbidding fracking bans or moratoriums by any member states/countries of the UK.

One of the ways the recent Scottish vote on declaring independence from the UK was defeated, was by the UK promising additional devolved powers to Scotland.

The question of military interventionism abroad is an evolving one in the UK. Just last September, the head of the Labour Party rose in the House of Commons to speak in favor of air strikes against ISIL in Iraq. http://press.labour.org.uk/post/98458975484/ed-miliband-statement-on-military-action-against
Labour Press

Ed Miliband statement on military action against ISIL in Iraq

(NOTE: I carefully considered whether this announcement was recent enough to qualify for LBN, and respectfully request that the time difference between the UK and the US be allowed for. The press release was midnight our time.)

Ed Miliband MP, Leader of the Labour Party, in a statement to the House of Commons, said:
Mr Speaker, I rise to support the government motion concerning military action against ISIL in Iraq. Let us be clear at the outset what is the proposition: air strikes against ISIL in Iraq. Not about ground troops.
Nor about UK military action elsewhere. And it is a mission specifically aimed at ISIL.


I think this push toward NON interventionism by the military is an extremely interesting and encouraging development. Must have the Military Industrial Complex in a real panic. Likewise for the pro-endless-war politicians and their owners/I mean lobbyists in the U.S. It appears members of the British Parliament and even entire political parties in the UK are not as whorishly for sale as their U.S. counterparts!
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SNP wants to block military action as price of Labour deal (Original Post) Divernan Mar 2015 OP
I believe that things like this are the intent of the TPP/TTIP - djean111 Mar 2015 #1
Blair & Bill Clinton - still BFFs. Divernan Mar 2015 #2
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. I believe that things like this are the intent of the TPP/TTIP -
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 08:57 AM
Mar 2015
For example, Wales and Scotland have each approved an indefinite ban on future fracking, so Big Fracking is trying to bribe the UK government to pass a law forbidding fracking bans or moratoriums by any member states/countries of the UK.


Corporations can sue over local or state or country-wide bans (haha! Not the USA, here, of course!) saying that banning fracking robs them of profits. Monsanto can sue the EU over banning GMOs - or persuade to EU to override the wishes of member countries.
So much more efficient, n'est-ce pas?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SNP wants to block milita...