Attorney: Ferguson shooting suspect didn't target officers
Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
A man accused of shooting two officers last week in Ferguson was not targeting police or aiming at demonstrators at a late-night protest, his attorney said Monday as he countered an earlier police description of the crime.
Defense attorney Jerryl Christmas also suggested that St. Louis County police may have used excessive force when arresting the suspect, Jeffrey Williams, saying his client had bruises on his back, shoulders and face and a knot on his head.
Police spokesman Brian Schellman called the lawyers allegations completely false, adding that Williams was seen by a nurse when booked into the county jail, standard procedure for all incoming inmates.
The nurse released Williams as fit for confinement, he said.
Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/attorney-ferguson-shooting-suspect-didn-t-target-officers/article_ee51e2bd-7a9b-53a5-9d3c-74d51eaf7444.html
This is not going to help the situation; it'll allow the Fox News crowd to say that Ferguson is lawless and needs tough policing.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)He's entitled to the best defense he can get.
rgbecker
(4,831 posts)All will have great opportunities to settle their disputes with fire power, the more the better. Who's to say it should only be a matter of bodily harm and not property rights? Why not blast away if someone tries to take away your .38?
The guy was simply complying with his latest issue of "The Rifleman".
As far as the police beating the shit out of the guy? What did you expect? Justice department report compliance in the same week as it was issued?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)what this lawyer said on tv last night - that Williams is not the right man. In this case since the victims are 2 policemen I would assume that the police would not just be satisfied with arresting anyone. They would want the real shooter. So I hope that they have the evidence and not just thinking they have him.
As to who he was targeting - only he knows that at the moment.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)claims that he was not "targeting the black cops"?
I'm not sure I'll choose to believe this shooter without further evidence and clear testimony.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Innocence presumed??
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)is that a black man shot two cops and was captured alive.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)It's all theater to me, but if this was really a guy who shot two cops, how is he still breathing?
vkkv
(3,384 posts)And it is terribly sad that it is a good point..