Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 02:33 PM Mar 2015

FDA approves genetically engineered potatoes, apples as safe

Source: AP-Excite

By MARY CLARE JALONICK and KEITH RIDLER

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Potatoes that won't bruise and apples that won't brown are a step closer to grocery store aisles.

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the genetically engineered foods, saying they are "as safe and nutritious as their conventional counterparts."

The approval covers six varieties of potatoes by Boise, Idaho-based J. R. Simplot Co. and two varieties of apples from the Canadian company Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc.

Okanagan, based in British Columbia, is trying to make apples a more convenient snack with its non-browning version. The company says bagged apples wouldn't have to be washed in antioxidants like they are now, a process that can affect taste. Neal Carter, the company's founder, says they want to see bagged apples become as prolific as bagged baby carrots.

FULL story at link.



This undated handout photo provided by Okanagan Specialty Fruits shows an Arctic{ae} Granny, left, Arctic{ae} Golden, right, and Arctic{ae} Granny slices. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday approved the genetically engineered foods as safe, saying they are as nutritious as their conventional counterparts. The approval covers six varieties of potatoes by Boise, Idaho-based J. R. Simplot Co. and two varieties of apples from the Canadian company Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc. (AP Photo/Okanagan Specialty Fruits)

Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150320/us--fda-potatoes_and_apples-d167803fd9.html



Oh boy the world needs more GMO's!...
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDA approves genetically engineered potatoes, apples as safe (Original Post) Omaha Steve Mar 2015 OP
You can always count on the gubbermint to look out for us! d_legendary1 Mar 2015 #1
Not LBN: The apple story is a month old. The potato story is several months old. HuckleB Mar 2015 #2
The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the genetically engineered foods Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #3
From LBN in November. HuckleB Mar 2015 #4
Please reread to get more clarity cosmicone Mar 2015 #8
They were approved before the McDonald's article. HuckleB Mar 2015 #9
Things are approved in stages cosmicone Mar 2015 #13
You know that this is a technicality. HuckleB Mar 2015 #15
It is not a technicality cosmicone Mar 2015 #16
Why are you making baseless claims about GMOs? HuckleB Mar 2015 #5
I don't like olives, mushrooms or GMO food. It's my choice. You eat what you want and I won't tell GoneFishin Mar 2015 #6
That's funny. HuckleB Mar 2015 #10
Because they're new and thus scary. So clearly they will kill us all. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2015 #7
Mutation breeding is new, too, but it can be organic so it's not scary! HuckleB Mar 2015 #11
If people need a reason to be frightened, they should google Triticale Major Nikon Mar 2015 #24
LOL! Indeed! HuckleB Mar 2015 #31
seems that the clown car has spilled it's cargo SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2015 #40
I know, right? Those three are on EVERY single GMO thread. Coinky-dinky-ental, huh? closeupready Mar 2015 #59
They aren't that new anymore Major Nikon Mar 2015 #22
You mean like in Attack of the Killer Tomatoes? cstanleytech Mar 2015 #36
We shouldn't oppose GMO claiming they're unsafe -- they are not. cosmicone Mar 2015 #12
Conventional and organic seeds are also patented. HuckleB Mar 2015 #14
How about some links to back up what you are saying? Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #41
As I recall, those studies were later discredited NickB79 Mar 2015 #42
Study ties GMO corn, soybeans to butterfly losses (Updated: March 16, 2012 - 9:37 PM) Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #43
And that's not related to the original study you posted NickB79 Mar 2015 #44
I agree with that Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #45
read my links and there are lots more if you want to educate yourself wordpix Mar 2015 #56
It's the glyphosate, a systemic poison wordpix Mar 2015 #55
No argument from me on Monsanto Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #58
obviously you need education- glyphosate applied on GE foods wordpix Mar 2015 #54
"nothing wrong"---yeah, you go eat glyphosate through the food chain wordpix Mar 2015 #53
Yay! geomon666 Mar 2015 #17
Tasteless CountAllVotes Mar 2015 #18
have you tasted them? Bradical79 Mar 2015 #46
Enjoy your Roundup Ready CountAllVotes Mar 2015 #50
Who is Michael Taylor Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #19
This is the problem - O has not cleaned house in agencies like FDA, EPA, Dept. of AGritoxins wordpix Mar 2015 #60
What could possibly go.. jimmydwight Mar 2015 #20
52 Congress members sign letter warning of GMOs killing monarch butterflies (March 18, 2015) Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #21
Who needs butterflies, anyway? There's no money in them. Zorra Mar 2015 #23
Are milkweed seeds available to buy? Doremus Mar 2015 #25
Yes: EX500rider Mar 2015 #26
Free Butterfly Garden Seeds, Quick Seed Purchases and Contributions for the Cause Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #27
Thank you!! <3 Doremus Mar 2015 #48
Neither of these are the "bad" kinds of GMO's. Hold those jerking knees. Xithras Mar 2015 #28
Yes, they are the "bad" kind of GMOs. bananas Mar 2015 #30
There is nothing wrong with the technology. Xithras Mar 2015 #33
No, they transfer a chunk of dna which contains the gene. bananas Mar 2015 #35
The purpose of this GMO is to deceive people. bananas Mar 2015 #32
Nope Xithras Mar 2015 #34
The beginning of the end. bananas Mar 2015 #29
source? Bradical79 Mar 2015 #47
Risk Expert: GMOs Could Destroy the Global Ecosystem bananas Mar 2015 #49
+1! RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #51
more about toxic glyphosate used on GMOs wordpix Mar 2015 #57
People helping people : El Shaman Mar 2015 #37
they better have a date stamped on the apples that never brown. :P Sunlei Mar 2015 #38
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2015 #39
K&R for that reply. (n/t) Nihil Mar 2015 #52

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
1. You can always count on the gubbermint to look out for us!
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 02:49 PM
Mar 2015

Especially when health and profits are concerned!

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
2. Not LBN: The apple story is a month old. The potato story is several months old.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 02:52 PM
Mar 2015

And there is nothing wrong with either product. Fear mongering is not ok.

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
3. The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the genetically engineered foods
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:04 PM
Mar 2015

Business News Mar 20, 2:43 pm (ET)

FDA approves genetically engineered potatoes, apples as safe photo
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Potatoes that won't bruise and apples that won't brown are a step closer to grocery store aisles. The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the genetically engineered foods, saying they are "as safe and nutritious...

Friday would be today?

You eat what you want. Heirloom fruits and veggies at this house by choice.

Why do GMO's kill butterflies? Science hasn't figured that out, but they are safe for us to eat.

Scanned at Goggle news just now.





 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
8. Please reread to get more clarity
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:29 PM
Mar 2015

The first link is about McDonalds not buying GMO potatoes (even if they were to be approved.)

The second link is about government approving "for planting."

The OP is about FDA clearance for commercial sales and it is DEFINITELY LBN.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
9. They were approved before the McDonald's article.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:31 PM
Mar 2015

It's only LBN if you think a ridiculous technicality in the process is LBN. It's not.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
13. Things are approved in stages
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:35 PM
Mar 2015

A drug may be approved for animal testing, then for safety testing in humans, then for efficacy testing in humans and finally approved for commercial sale.

EACH one of those events is a separate LBN when it happens.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
15. You know that this is a technicality.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:36 PM
Mar 2015

If they had been rejected, that would have been big news.

This is not news.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
5. Why are you making baseless claims about GMOs?
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:19 PM
Mar 2015

Pushing such groundless fear mongering is unethical.

How would these products cause harm?

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
6. I don't like olives, mushrooms or GMO food. It's my choice. You eat what you want and I won't tell
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:28 PM
Mar 2015

you what you should or should not eat. You do the same.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
10. That's funny.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:32 PM
Mar 2015

No one told you to eat GMOs. Plenty of people love to rant about GMOs, and love to tell people that they shouldn't eat them, despite the fact that there is no justification for such an admonition.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
11. Mutation breeding is new, too, but it can be organic so it's not scary!
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:33 PM
Mar 2015

Arbitrary definitions that lead to strange fears are truly, well, slightly interesting, anyway.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
24. If people need a reason to be frightened, they should google Triticale
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 06:43 PM
Mar 2015

It's sold in health food stores and is often labeled as organic because it meets the NOP organic standards.

It's a hybrid made commercially available via treatment with colchicine, which is used by the pharmaceutical industry to treat gout, and causes toxic side effects even in small doses. But of course it's all natural (even though nature could never produce it). No safety or environmental testing required (unlike GMO).

Or how about Mutation Enhanced Technologies for Agriculture (META)? It involves spraying plants with sodium azide or placing them next to a gamma ray source like cobalt-60 in order to produce genome mutations. To date, 3218 mutant varietals have been produced by this method, none of which require safety or environmental testing like GMO, and all are eligible for organic certification. Nothing more natural than that, eh?
http://mvgs.iaea.org/Search.aspx

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
12. We shouldn't oppose GMO claiming they're unsafe -- they are not.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:33 PM
Mar 2015

What is bad about GMO applications is intellectual property rights that can squeeze growers of non-GMO crops and/or making the farms dependent upon a specific fertilizer which can only be obtained from the manufacturer at a higher cost.

GMO is no different from cross-breeding utilized by farmers for thousands of years except that it is done in a lab in a far shorter period of time. What is bad is the commercial monopolies it may create.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
14. Conventional and organic seeds are also patented.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 03:36 PM
Mar 2015

Farmers don't have to choose to grow GMOs. The question is why some people do not want them to have the choice to use them if they want to do so.

Corporate malfeasance is one thing, but it is not a GMO only piece of any puzzle. All types of seeds and farming face the same problems in that area.

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
41. How about some links to back up what you are saying?
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 09:47 AM
Mar 2015


We have known for a couple decades!

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=120016

Study: GM Corn Harms Monarch Butterflies
W A S H I N G T O N, Aug. 21
Iowa State University researchers said today they found more evidence that pollen from bioengineered corn could be deadly for Monarch butterflies, prompting environmentalists to renew demands for tighter restrictions on the crop.

The Iowa study published in the journal Oecologia comes at a time when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has launched its own review of the safety of corn and cotton plants modified to contain a pest-fighting gene.

The Clinton administration has faced growing pressure during the past year from consumer and environmental groups, as well as some U.S. trading partners, who say not enough is yet known about the long-term safety of biotech crops. The seed industry and agribusiness contend that gene-spliced crops have undergone thousands of tests and pose no more safety risks than conventional crops.

Iowa State researchers John Obrycki and Laura Hansen said their research showed Monarch butterfly caterpillars were seven times more likely to die when they ate milkweed plants carrying pollen from Bt corn, compared to conventional corn.

FULL story at link.

NickB79

(19,243 posts)
42. As I recall, those studies were later discredited
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 11:24 AM
Mar 2015

Primarily because the researchers fed the caterpillars levels of GM pollen impossible to obtain in nature to obtain an increased death rate.

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
43. Study ties GMO corn, soybeans to butterfly losses (Updated: March 16, 2012 - 9:37 PM)
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 11:31 AM
Mar 2015

http://www.startribune.com/local/143017765.html

Article by: JOSEPHINE MARCOTTY , Star Tribune Updated: March 16, 2012 - 9:37 PM
Herbicide-resistant crops can withstand Roundup, which kills monarchs' preferred nesting plant.

Genetically engineered corn and soybeans make it easy for farmers to eradicate weeds, including the long-lived and unruly milkweed.

But they might be putting the monarch butterfly in peril.

The rapid spread of herbicide-resistant crops has coincided with -- and may explain -- the dramatic decline in monarch numbers that has troubled some naturalists over the past decade, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Minnesota and Iowa State University.

Between 1999 and 2010, the same period in which so-called GMO crops became the norm for farmers, the number of monarch eggs declined by an estimated 81 percent across the Midwest, the researchers say. That's because milkweed -- the host plant for the eggs and caterpillars produced by one of one of the most gaudy and widely recognized of all North American butterflies -- has nearly disappeared from farm fields, they found.

FULL story at link.

The study “does not resolve the debate,” cautioned a researcher at the University of Maryland. Drought and other habitat damage are likely culprits, too.


NickB79

(19,243 posts)
44. And that's not related to the original study you posted
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 11:37 AM
Mar 2015

The first study, from 1997, stated that GM pollen was DIRECTLY killing caterpillars because they were consuming GM pollen that fell on leaves of milkweed plants growing next to the fields. This was discredited by subsequent studies.

The more recent study you just posted stated that caterpillars are now starving to death because all the milkweed plants that used to grow on field edges have been killed by applications of Round-Up. This is supported by subsequent studies.

The end result is the same, but the causative agent is different.

BTW, thanks for reminding me to get some milkweed seeds started for planting this spring around the yard; I'd almost forgotten about the envelope of them in my seed bin.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
55. It's the glyphosate, a systemic poison
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:09 AM
Mar 2015

Gets in the plant tissues and then kills organisms feeding on the plants

Crystal Gammon and Environmental Health News, Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/weed-whacking-herbicide-p/ Jun 23, 2009

Truthout. http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/25426-one-little-piggy-had-birth-defects-is-monsantos-roundup-to-blame. Aug. 8, 2014

“Studies conducted on rats and rabbits since the 1980s have shown an astonishing spectrum of birth defects associated with glyphosate, including absent kidneys, missing lobes of the lungs, enlarged hearts, ventricular septal defects (holes in the heart), extra ribs, and deformed and absent bones of the skull, spine, ribs, sternum and limbs.”

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
58. No argument from me on Monsanto
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:25 AM
Mar 2015

I just prefer my food to come from farm, not lab work.

http://www.honeycrisp.com/honeycrisp.html

HONEYCRISP HISTORY

Honeycrisp apple trees were derived from a 1960 cross of Macoun and Honeygold, at the University of Minnesota apple breeding program. The University was looking to develop winter hardy cultivars with high fruit quality. The original Honeycrisp apple seedling was planted in 1962 at the University of Minnesota Horticultural Research Center. In 1974 it was excepted as a possible new and exciting variety. Honeycrisp then know and evaluated as MN 1711 was tested at locations Minnesota, Michigan and here in New York at the Cornell Research Station in Geneva. In 1982, research scientist Dave Bedford rediscovered the tree and really loved the apples. As the story is told "He and Researcher James Luby went back to the records that had been kept on "1711." According to Luby, its data sheet had "DISCARD" scrawled across it." In 1988 a plant patented was applied for and in 1991 the apple we know as Honeycrisp was released for commercial propagation by the nurseries around the Country. Now Honeycrisp apples are known around the World.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
54. obviously you need education- glyphosate applied on GE foods
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:07 AM
Mar 2015

is known to cause cell damage at concentrations 100,000x more dilute than shelved product. Go ahead and eat this toxic substance through the food chain and let us know when the cancer shows up or your children are born with birth defects

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22331240

http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2176082/deformities_sickness_livestock_deaths_the_real_cost_of_glyphosate_gm_animal_feed.html

Crystal Gammon and Environmental Health News, Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/weed-whacking-herbicide-p/ Jun 23, 2009

Truthout. http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/25426-one-little-piggy-had-birth-defects-is-monsantos-roundup-to-blame. Aug. 8, 2014

“Studies conducted on rats and rabbits since the 1980s have shown an astonishing spectrum of birth defects associated with glyphosate, including absent kidneys, missing lobes of the lungs, enlarged hearts, ventricular septal defects (holes in the heart), extra ribs, and deformed and absent bones of the skull, spine, ribs, sternum and limbs.”

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
53. "nothing wrong"---yeah, you go eat glyphosate through the food chain
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:59 AM
Mar 2015

and get back to me when you have cancer and/or Parkinson's

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
46. have you tasted them?
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 01:32 PM
Mar 2015

I'm looking forward to trying them since they won't be sprayed by that anti-oxident. Should taste better.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
60. This is the problem - O has not cleaned house in agencies like FDA, EPA, Dept. of AGritoxins
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:58 AM
Mar 2015

and so on. These revolving door people are in high positions, recruited from industries like Big Pharma, Big Oil/Mining/Logging and Big Agrichemical. It goes on and on. O needs to get busy getting these a-holes out and real research chemists, environmentalists, and organic farmers/ranchers IN

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
21. 52 Congress members sign letter warning of GMOs killing monarch butterflies (March 18, 2015)
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 06:03 PM
Mar 2015

There are hundreds of articles about this. IF they don't know why it kills butterflies, what don't they know about what it does to people, other animals, & plants in the food chain?


http://www.naturalnews.com/049067_monarch_butterflies_GMOs_Congress.html#

Wednesday, March 18, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: monarch butterflies, GMOs, Congress

(NaturalNews) Dozens of House Democrats have signed onto a letter sent to President Obama claiming that the spread of GM crops is leading to the death of monarch butterflies.

The letter,[PDF] authored by Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine, says that the butterflies are "in peril of being lost to the history books" in large part because of the "virtual eradication" of milkweed plants from their primary breeding grounds in the Midwest.

The milkweed eradication, the letter states, has come primarily from the "widespread spraying of herbicides in agricultural areas" where the plants were once bountiful.

"With the advent of herbicide-resistant genetically engineered crops, the use of herbicides like glyphosate has increased..." dramatically, from 20 million pounds per year in 1992 to more than 250 million pounds by 2011, said the letter.

FULL story at link.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
25. Are milkweed seeds available to buy?
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 06:45 PM
Mar 2015

I'd like to buy some and plant them in my yard for the butterflies.

I'd also give them out to friends and relatives and ask them to do likewise. Maybe throw some in empty lots etc.

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
27. Free Butterfly Garden Seeds, Quick Seed Purchases and Contributions for the Cause
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 07:35 PM
Mar 2015

This was in GD a couple weeks ago: http://www.livemonarch.com/free-milkweed-seeds.htm

Live Monarch will send 15+ Butterfly Garden seeds including Milkweed and growing instructions even if you can not afford a contribution just mail us a self addressed stamped envelope, one per household. A save the Monarch contribution is greatly appreciated to help offset the cost of the many seeds we give away, personally plant and plants we provide to schools.

One dollar goes a long way to help Monarchs, and we will send 50+ seeds per dollar as a thank you. If you need more seeds, send a larger contribution with your written request. (These same seed packs sell all over the web for $2 - $4 for only a few seeds). We send out two Northern Varieties called Syriaca and Speciosa which can survive the winters at the end of the growing season, and Asclepias Curassavica (southern milkweed / red and yellow flowers) to appropriate areas. It is a favorite egg-laying plant which grows quickly and will sprout many seed pods. From time to time we may have other types and do our best to send them back to the regions where they were gathered. Just request the type you want with the drop down menus below. Our staff will choose the appropriate type if you prefer. Please include a small note below as well if you have a special request. We read every one and do our best to meet your needs. Please give what you can so we can provide materials to as many as possible.

To get seeds right now use the "Pay Now" button below. Use the drop down menus to choose the best choices and include a note if necessary, then click PAY NOW for the secure online form, where you can submit your information safely.

To make an online contribution at the same time just use the drop down menus and select to share a little half or most of your seed purchase with others. We send seeds every time with our thanks unless instructed not to. You are the most important part of this Campaign, every seed you plant and share is important and we can only ensure the Magic of the Monarchs one seed at a time.

At different levels of contribution we can offer the items below as thank you gifts. At $3.49 it is 150 seeds and a complete information pack delivered to your door. At $20 we send 1000 seeds for your region and a personalized letter. Use the links to request the type of seeds you want or ask us to pick for you. We have redesigned this quick check out to include more options and hope you help us continue to ensure that we all have the FREE education and low cost resources to Save the Monarch Migration. Thank you, LMF STAFF.

You will receive seeds and full color Monarch rearing instruction sheets, milkweed growing instructions and our heartfelt thanks. There are no butterflies in your return envelope. The information sheet is preprinted for you to keep as a reference sheet and to share the education to help Monarchs and butterflies in every life stage.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
48. Thank you!! <3
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 02:01 PM
Mar 2015

What a wonderful website. If we all expend just a little effort we can save the monarch. I placed an order and with any luck I'll be seeing milkweeds around every corner!


Xithras

(16,191 posts)
28. Neither of these are the "bad" kinds of GMO's. Hold those jerking knees.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:06 PM
Mar 2015

In the case of the apples, they identified the gene that produces the polyphenols that turn apples brown. Once the gene was identified, they located varieties of apples that produce the polyphenols at much lower rates and transferred the genes from those apples to other apple species. This is fundamentally the same kind of same-species crossbreeding that farmers have been using to create new varieties for nearly ten thousand years. The only difference is that the researchers transferred the genes in a laboratory instead of spending years crossbreeding varieties in a greenhouse to get the traits they want.

This is a fundamentally different thing than researchers inserting artificial genes to make crops resist certain poisons, or inserting genes from fish to make a tomato taste better.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
30. Yes, they are the "bad" kind of GMOs.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:22 PM
Mar 2015

What makes a GMO a GMO is the technology used for extracting and inserting genes, and that technology itself has problems.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
33. There is nothing wrong with the technology.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:39 PM
Mar 2015

Show me one single study demonstrating any sort of danger from same species gene transfer. Just one. I'll wait.

The problems in GMO production, whether real or imagined, stem from the insertion of genes from differing species, or genes that are artificially generated in a lab. In this case, we're talking about taking a naturally occurring gene from one variety of apple and transferring it to another variety of the same species. You could get the exact same interaction by planting both varieties next to each other and letting the bees go at them. Using a lab to transfer the genes you want, instead of waiting for the bees and dumb luck to hit the same combination for you, carries no inherent danger whatsoever.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
35. No, they transfer a chunk of dna which contains the gene.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:51 PM
Mar 2015

They used to think the surrounding dna was "junk dna", harmless filler that couldn't possibly have any effect at all.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
32. The purpose of this GMO is to deceive people.
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:29 PM
Mar 2015

The apples and potatoes still bruise, they just don't turn brown where they're bruised.
The only reason they want to sell these is to deceive people into thinking they are buying produce which isn't bruised.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
34. Nope
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 08:43 PM
Mar 2015

Oxidizing polyphenols modify the taste and texture of an apple, making it less edible. The gene transfer in these apples reduces the polyphenols responsible for browning. They aren't making the browning less visible, they're actually reducing the browning.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
51. +1!
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 01:55 PM
Mar 2015

I was going to post this, too.
What's interesting is that even though I also oppose nuclear energy, Taleb ultimately considers GMOs more dangerous than nuclear.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
38. they better have a date stamped on the apples that never brown. :P
Fri Mar 20, 2015, 11:48 PM
Mar 2015

I imagine a beautiful apple that tastes all rotten

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
39. K&R
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 12:50 AM
Mar 2015

[center]








War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Censorship is Transparency
Mandatory Voting is Freedom of Choice
Nobel Peace Prize is For Warmongerers [/center]

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FDA approves genetically ...