Pennsylvania lawmakers push for open public-sector union bargaining
Source: TribLive
By Brad Bumsted
HARRISBURG With billions of dollars at stake in upcoming state union negotiations, key lawmakers say they will look closely at legislation that would require public-sector union negotiating sessions to be open to taxpayers.
Secrecy breeds distrust, said Sen. Ryan Aument, R-Lancaster County. Taxpayers deserve at least the opportunity to be present when elected officials negotiate a collective bargaining agreement that will be paid for with tax dollars.
The bill's co-sponsors include Senate President Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson County, and Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre County.
Sixteen union contracts will be due with the budget July 1, the largest of which is with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Its director and spokesman could not be reached for comment.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://triblive.com/politics/politicalheadlines/8014750-74/state-negotiations-open#axzz3VCV1zwoE
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)Historic NY
(37,452 posts)Pa. is loaded with Baggers & TP affiliates that would just love to get in on negotiations. Google id loaded with articles.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/386774/anatomy-gop-disaster-losing-pennsylvania-john-fund
BumRushDaShow
(129,250 posts)Somewhat related to the "personnel exception" is the Act's provision for information, strategy and negotiation sessions related to labor relations. The courts have said that the Act does not require an agency to negotiate a labor contract in public session.
Therefore, an agency may meet in executive session to receive information and conduct discussions about the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement with its employees. The exception also applies when an agency meets to hold discussions regarding a union grievance or labor relations arbitration.
<...>
http://panewsmedia.org/legal/openmeetings/sunshineactmisconceptions
Of course the governor could veto any such legislation if he wants to and if he and the union believe the negotiating sessions should occur in the same manner as they have occurred in the past. And I don't think this proposed legislation could muster 2/3rds of both chambers to successfully override a veto, assuming the Democrats vote against such and override vote en bloc. Anyone who has ever done union negotiations as I have many years ago, finds it's often easier to get through it without the peanut gallery (and in this case, that would be the RW media, which is really who they probably want there to make mountains out of molehills, obfuscate, skew, purposely mis-report, and outright lie about what is being negotiated).