Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:55 AM Mar 2015

Weekly Address: Protecting Working Americans’ Paychecks

Source: White House

In this week’s address, the President highlighted the progress made protecting American consumers since he signed Wall Street reform into law five years ago, including an important new step taken by the independent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau earlier this week toward preventing abuses in payday lending.

The President emphasized his commitment to fighting to advance middle-class economics and ensure everybody who works hard can get ahead, while opposing attempts by Republicans both to weaken the CFPB and give large tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans at the expense of the middle class.



Read more: https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/03/28/weekly-address-protecting-working-americans-paychecks



Transcript
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/28/weekly-address-protecting-working-americans-paychecks


(snip)
As Americans, we believe there’s nothing wrong with making a profit. But there is something wrong with making that profit by trapping hard-working men and women in a vicious cycle of debt.

Protecting working Americans’ paychecks shouldn’t be a partisan issue. But the budget Republicans unveiled last week would make it harder, not easier, to crack down on financial fraud and abuse. And this week, when Republicans rolled out their next economic idea, it had nothing to do with the middle class. It was a new, more-than-$250 billion tax cut for the top one-tenth of the top one percent of Americans. That would mean handing out an average tax cut of $4 million a year to just 4,000 Americans per year, and leaving the rest of the country to pay for it.

I don’t think our top economic priority should be helping a tiny number of Americans who are already doing extraordinarily well, and asking everybody else to foot the bill. I think our top priority should be helping everybody who works hard get ahead. This country does best when everyone gets their fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.


That’s what middle-class economics is all about, and as long as I’m your President, that’s what I’ll keep on fighting to do.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weekly Address: Protecting Working Americans’ Paychecks (Original Post) cal04 Mar 2015 OP
Keeping them safe. In the banks. Sometimes without even involving the worker. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2015 #1
K&R about his mention of the scourge of Payday Lenders BumRushDaShow Mar 2015 #2
Yeah, they're terrible. christx30 Mar 2015 #4
Yup and I think the idea that people floated about the USPS offering banking services BumRushDaShow Mar 2015 #5
I agree. And the best way to get rid of these 3rd party lenders christx30 Mar 2015 #6
payday lenders , leagel loansharks allan01 Mar 2015 #3
Too little, too late. ibewlu606 Mar 2015 #7

BumRushDaShow

(129,541 posts)
2. K&R about his mention of the scourge of Payday Lenders
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:41 AM
Mar 2015

and efforts to reign them in.

If you go into any big city, you will see the poorest neighborhoods littered with these, along with check-cashing places and pawn shops. This because banks (as well as supermarkets) refuse to open up shop there.

Thanks for posting! Listened this morning on my local news radio station and also glad to hear his mention about the "tax breaks for the top 1/10th of 1%"ers that is currently in the GOP joke of a fiscal year 2016 budget.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
4. Yeah, they're terrible.
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 11:19 AM
Mar 2015

I've had to use them a few times due to unforseen circumstances and 8 days before my next paycheck. End up paying back a whole heck of a lot more than I got out. But at the time, there were no other alternatives.

BumRushDaShow

(129,541 posts)
5. Yup and I think the idea that people floated about the USPS offering banking services
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 12:36 PM
Mar 2015

should be the viable alternative if banks refuse to locate in under-served areas and/or refuse to offer reasonable small/temporary loan rates leaving people no other option than these 3rd party lenders.

I swear, the usury laws need to be brought back full force!

christx30

(6,241 posts)
6. I agree. And the best way to get rid of these 3rd party lenders
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 01:34 PM
Mar 2015

is to put the usury laws back into full force. They'll know if they they can't make obscene profits off the backs of people, they'll close down.

 

ibewlu606

(160 posts)
7. Too little, too late.
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 02:01 PM
Mar 2015

And it's only taken him 7 years to accomplish this. Is this the "hope & change" we worked so hard for in 2008? In 2012 I was an activist for real Democrats like Alan Grayson. I didn't even bother voting for Bushama and Bill "don't bother me" Nelson.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Weekly Address: Protectin...