Consider how Barack Obama was polling at this point in 2003.

and tell us why we shouldn't believe the polls and that the support for Warren and Sanders is far far more because droves of Hillary supporters will leave her.

I used to laugh at Faux's echo chamber which made repukes believe that Romney was going to win.

I can't laugh at DU's echo chamber....

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

I like Hillary. She comes across as very likeable to me. I just want someone more progressive. If I can't have that, then I will vote for Hillary. Not voting is tantamount to voting for the second coming of the Dark Ages.

Unfortunately, there are many here who have vowed to not vote for Hillary under any circumstances. I wonder if they'd rather have Jeb Bush, Scott Walker or (ohgawdno) Ted Cruz elected.

A candidate who isn't Hillary just needs to get their name out there and keep plugging, if they are in a primary then the media will start focusing a little more. Its just too early to tell but I will say she has the best odds.

So they are going to vote for a Democrat. That's all this poll shows. Democrats vote for a Democrat. Usually.

so of course they were going to pick a Democrat. The issue is who they picked and the overwhelming support they gave that pick.

The other candidates were not "obvious candidates" in the sense I mean.

The point is that they voted for her because she is the only Democrat that they recognized on the list.

that is how they determine whether they have a chance or not. They are not strangers to Democratic voters in New Hampshire.

Nobody has done any real campaigning yet. All these polls are too early to be meaningful.

In a November 3, 2014 interview in People Magazine Senator Warren again says that she will not run for President in 2016.

However Senator Elizabeth Warren admits that she would love to be Treasury Secretary In a Hillary Clinton Administration.

Thanks.

The article says that she belted out a big belly laugh and said, "Now THAT's a fun thought!"

http://www.people.com/people/mobile/article/0,,20865135,00.html

You also quote the article as saying "she belted out a big belly laugh" when to be 100% accurate the article says "she belted out a big, Clinton-caliber belly laugh"

I get the feeling that because she laughed when being asked if she would like to play a role in a Democratic Administration you think that she is being sarcastic, when in fact Elizabeth Warren is the only one who brought up playing a role in a Hillary Clinton Administration. If you had the actual magazine you would see where it shows the reporter asking a question with a Q: then below the question would be Senator Warren's Answer with an A:

The online article only sums up the interview making it sound like she was asked if she would play a role in a Hillary Clinton Administration when in fact the interviewer asks the question If not Commander in Chief Would You Consider Playing a role in the Next Administration.


"So, if not chief executive, how would Warren feel about being Treasury Secretary under a President Hillary Clinton? Warren belts out a big, Clinton-caliber belly laugh. "Well, THAT'S a fun thought!"

The Clintons have been popular in NH ever since Bill ran for president in 1992. Hillary won the NH primary in 2008.