Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,437 posts)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 07:38 PM Apr 2015

In second launch attempt, SpaceX fails to safely land rocket back on Earth

Source: Houston Chronicle

3:30 p.m. UPDATE: While the Dragon spacecraft made it safely to orbit, the Falcon 9 rocket didn’t quite make it back to Earth in one piece.

ORIGINAL ENTRY: This afternoon, at 3:10 p.m. CT, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft are due to make a second launch attempt from Florida for the International Space Station. Anvil clouds producing lightning scrubbed Monday’s attempt, but weather conditions appear better today.

It’s the sixth resupply mission to the station, but more significantly for space buffs this is probably the rocket company’s best chance yet to recover its spent booster.

SpaceX plans for the first stage of its Falcon 9 rocket to execute a controlled reentry through Earth’s atmosphere, and to touch down nine minutes later on a drone ship off the coast of Florida.

Read more: http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2015/04/in-second-launch-attempt-spacex-set-to-try-and-make-history/



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In second launch attempt, SpaceX fails to safely land rocket back on Earth (Original Post) TexasTowelie Apr 2015 OP
Stories like this are the answer Mr.Bill Apr 2015 #1
I don't think NASA's ever even tried to land a booster... mike_c Apr 2015 #2
I was talking about the space program in general, Mr.Bill Apr 2015 #3
Please don't in this case yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #4
Noam Chomsky says that's been it's primary role..... DeSwiss Apr 2015 #5
Say, WHAT??? Daemonaquila Apr 2015 #6
False equivalence Thor_MN Apr 2015 #7
Space X is pushing the envelope. Adrahil Apr 2015 #9
The other poster was comparing 1960's NASA with 2010 Space X. False equivalence. Thor_MN Apr 2015 #10
Understood. But a couple of things to keep in mind... Adrahil Apr 2015 #11
And cashews are not nuts, they are seeds. Thor_MN Apr 2015 #13
NASA has landed a rocket on a ship? Adrahil Apr 2015 #8
Bone up on SpaceX and Elon Musk, sir. truthisfreedom Apr 2015 #12

Mr.Bill

(24,325 posts)
1. Stories like this are the answer
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 07:47 PM
Apr 2015

when someone asks the question: "Name one thing that government can do better than private business."

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
2. I don't think NASA's ever even tried to land a booster...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:01 PM
Apr 2015

...so right now SpaceX is certainly doing better than NASA has. They've achieved controlled descent under power. That's a biggie. They'll get there if they keep working on it.

Mr.Bill

(24,325 posts)
3. I was talking about the space program in general,
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:28 PM
Apr 2015

not this one specific thing. Let me know when private enterprise lands a man or woman on the moon and returns them safely. I do think private enterprise has a role to play in the space program, though.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
5. Noam Chomsky says that's been it's primary role.....
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:35 PM
Apr 2015

...using the military budget mainly to siphon money off from taxes under the guise of ''protecting'' us, and then using it for high tech research. Later, the business sector who've been largely contracted to do the legwork, comes in and takes advantage of the discoveries. And then we get to buy cell phones we paid for the research to invent.

- And that's capitalism for ya, all of the up and none of the down. Unless you're shorting stocks.......

 

Daemonaquila

(1,712 posts)
6. Say, WHAT???
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:11 PM
Apr 2015

This is an amazing success. SpaceX has been far more successful than NASA in getting new tech out the door, tested, and into actual use. OMG, a mere 2 partial successes out of 2 attempts? NASA would have killed to have that kind of a batting average.

I'm tired of hearing how this is a failure, already. It came down in a controlled fashion and right on target. Ok, it was a harder landing than they wanted. That's what happens when you are working on a completely new concept. Just how many failures do you think NASA had when working out the tech on the moon lander? You just can't recite them because unlike SpaceX, NASA didn't put their attempts on social media where all the world could see them (and play armchair quarterback).

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
7. False equivalence
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:53 PM
Apr 2015

NASA did not have the computational power available today when developing the Apollo program.

I'm not saying that this was a failure, but comparing development now with development in the 1960's is a failure.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
9. Space X is pushing the envelope.
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 05:59 PM
Apr 2015

NASA has no plans to do anything like this with its new launch vehicles.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
11. Understood. But a couple of things to keep in mind...
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 11:14 PM
Apr 2015

Much of the engineering work at NASA isn't (or at least wasn't) done by government engineers, but by contractors. I have personal experience with this.

It's interesting to note that the new Orion system is essentially a retread of Apollo in concept. It is surely more advanced in many ways, but they are going back to an Apollo-type capsule with an ablative heat shield and "splash-down" recovery. I think it's a step backwards.

truthisfreedom

(23,155 posts)
12. Bone up on SpaceX and Elon Musk, sir.
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 11:30 PM
Apr 2015

You need more information. He's doing what has never been attempted, and i know he'll pull it off FIRST.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In second launch attempt,...