Tax Cuts For The Poor And Middle Class -- Not The Rich -- Create Jobs, Research Shows
Source: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES
By Cole Stangler @colestangler on April 22 2015 12:18 PM EDT
The exact link between tax cuts and job growth has for years been a matter of fiery debate, from college economics departments to the chambers of Congress. Now, a working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research could add some nuance to the dispute: Tax cuts do, in fact, boost employment and investment, just not when theyre directed at the rich.
The study from Owen Zidar, a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, found that tax cuts aimed at the top 10 percent of earners produce little stimulative effect on the overall economy. On the other hand, those aimed at the bottom 90 percent have a greater impact.
Zidar examined the short- to medium-term impact of tax changes at the state and federal levels going back to 1948. On the national level, he found a 1 percent gross domestic product (GDP) tax cut aimed at the bottom 90 percent translates to job growth of 2 to 5 percent, but the impact of a similar cut on the top 10 percent of earners has a negligible effect. He reached similar conclusions on the state level: Tax decreases for most of the population generated 5 percent employment growth, but yielded little change when applied to the top income bracket.
Tax hikes produce similar effects, the paper says. When applied to the rich, theyre insignificant. But when applied to the rest of the population, they have a negative effect on economic activity.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/tax-cuts-poor-middle-class-not-rich-create-jobs-research-shows-1892251
Kingofalldems
(38,468 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)is my math right?
The measly million$ they spend on campaign$ are just pocket change for them.
Warpy
(111,319 posts)creating jobs and real wealth at every single step of the process. The rich just forgot that part and decided to steal it directly, choking off the demand side of the economy and wrecking it over and over again.
However, the tax cutting has run its course, except for regressive sales taxes. It's time for wage increases targeted at the very bottom. That is the one thing that will jump start this economy the fastest.
The wealthy won't allow it, of course, until their cash flow is in the toilet and all their risky investments have evaporated into thin air again.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)That multiplier effect is why food stamps turns out to be one of the most effective stimulus programs around. (See the wonderful chart from Moody's down below.)
Scuba
(53,475 posts)brer cat
(24,591 posts)Thanks for posting, Scuba.
Gothmog
(145,481 posts)Supply side economics are a joke and do not work
midnight
(26,624 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)the CEOs that buy our politicians (R and D).
IronLionZion
(45,494 posts)toddwv
(2,830 posts)Beauregard
(376 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)No. That is not the way to go. Raising the Social Security taxes so that they are paid on ALL income is the way to go. Then the overall rate of the Social Security taxes might be cut. But Social Security is the bedrock of middle class security and prosperity.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)that is what I thought too.
"They're making another run at Social Security by cutting the FICA deductions (Payroll Tax)"
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Hugin
(33,177 posts)As I pointed out in 2008 and was summarily shouted off this very forum.
Every dollar you give to the middle class turns over three times... Every dollar to the rich, once, maybe.
Susannah Elf
(140 posts)to an overseas tax shelter...
Hugin
(33,177 posts)Unfortunately in modern America both Dollars ultimately end up in that same tax shelter. It just takes the middle class Dollar a little while longer and it does some good along the way.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)DUH! We've know this for 80 years. The GOP just makes crap up to keep funneling money to the 1%.
Damansarajaya
(625 posts)Scoooore!