Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,938 posts)
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 01:43 PM Jun 2015

U.S. top court declines request to revive Arizona immigration law

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday left intact an appeals court ruling from last year that struck down an Arizona law that denied bail to illegal immigrants charged with certain felonies.

The justices rejected an appeal filed by Maricopa County and its controversial sheriff, Joe Arpaio. Three of the court's conservative justices, Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito, said they would have heard the case. Four of the nine justices must agree to hear a case for the court to take it up.

The court's action means the October 2014 ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said the 2006 law is unconstitutional, is the final word in the case.

Thomas wrote in an opinion joined by Scalia that the court's refusal to hear the case "shows insufficient respect to the state of Arizona, its voters and its constitution."

The court's action "suggests to the lower courts that they have free rein to strike down state laws on the basis of dubious constitutional analysis," Thomas added.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/01/us-usa-court-immigration-idUSKBN0OH2L920150601



US | Mon Jun 1, 2015 10:04am EDT
WASHINGTON | BY LAWRENCE HURLEY

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. top court declines request to revive Arizona immigration law (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2015 OP
Methinks Roberts is going Souter on the repukes cosmicone Jun 2015 #1
Roberts can read the writing on the wall Demeter Jun 2015 #2
Had to have been two of the conservative justices defected LTG Jun 2015 #4
But, according to the OP cosmicone Jun 2015 #5
"Shows insufficient respect to the state of Arizona, its voters and its constitution." d_legendary1 Jun 2015 #3
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
1. Methinks Roberts is going Souter on the repukes
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 01:47 PM
Jun 2015

He is not siding with the repuke block in more and more cases.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
2. Roberts can read the writing on the wall
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 02:12 PM
Jun 2015

He's still a jerk, but he's decided not to hang around with the Three Stooges so much.

He's probably working on that Legacy thing, too. Maybe that means he's retiring?

LTG

(216 posts)
4. Had to have been two of the conservative justices defected
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 05:21 PM
Jun 2015

Granting a Writ of Certiorari only requires the vote of 4 justices, not 5.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
5. But, according to the OP
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jun 2015

Scalia, Thomas and Alito said they would have heard the case. Which means Kennedy and Roberts defected.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
3. "Shows insufficient respect to the state of Arizona, its voters and its constitution."
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 04:03 PM
Jun 2015

Fuck you Thomas. He reminds me of the guy Samuel L. Jackson played in Django Unchained.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. top court declines r...